It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Gina Miller wins at the Supreme court over Brexxit..But what is in it for her?

page: 1
4
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 06:56 AM
link   
So this business woman has privately gone through the courts in regards of having other MP's etc being involved in the activation of Article 50 which is the start to the leaving of the EU. She herself says its about "process" yet ignores that the people spoke and the MP's in charge now have to do the peoples bidding. She herself says that she does not have a problem leaving the EU but if that is the case why the cost from her pocket to try to put clauses in it. Apparently she's acting alone but why would she, I personally am sure there's a private group of backers hoping to force some economic pressure which I would presume they have certain interest in.

Here's a Wiki about her and should be treated as any Wiki.



Wikipedia





Born in British Guiana (now Guyana) as Gina Nadira Singh,[10] the daughter of Doodnauth Singh, former Attorney General of Guyana,[11][12] she moved to England aged 10,[13][14] She was educated at Roedean School but ran away at the age of 14, subsequently attending Moira House Girls School.[12][15] She studied law at the University of East London but did not complete her finals.[12] She gained a degree in marketing, and an MSc in human resource management at the University of London.[6] She owned a property photographic laboratory in 1987, before becoming a marketing and event manager at BMW Fleet Division in 1990. She started a specialist financial services marketing agency in 1992, and launched the Senate investment conference programme in 1996. In 2006 she became a marketing consultant.[6] In February 2009,[16] Miller co-founded the investment firm SCM Private (now SCM Direct) with her husband Alan Miller.[13][17] She has been a leading campaigner against hidden charges in pensions and investment and what she describes as "flagrant mis-selling within the asset management market". She set up Miller Philanthropy (now rebranded the True and Fair Foundation) in 2009, and established MoneyShe.com in 2014, as a female-focussed investment brand.[6][12]





In January 2012,[16][20] she set up the True and Fair Campaign, with the stated aim to "limit the possibility of future mis-selling or financial scandals through greater transparency."[14] This initiative attracted the animosity of part of the City, earning her the nickname of "black widow spider".[17] She reported being called "a disgrace [whose] lobbying efforts would bring down the entire City".[13]


Now here's my issue, some of this says she has a idea to keep big business semi clean BUT name me a person who is making the sums that can fund a private supreme court challenge that has not been somehow involved in the same business idealism she seems to want to make more 'transparent'. Why would this person put time, money and energy in to attempting to shape the way the Article 50 is handled.

My question is, what is in it for her?

What is there hiding that she seems to want to protect?

If she's not against us leaving then why the problem, due course was followed, with the announcement today from Corbyn that even after the court case Labour will not stop us leaving the EU it seems an odd case to have taken to court.

It simply makes me wonder what she has linked in to the EU she is trying to protect or protect for others?

Am I reading too much in to this?

I just feel its not just about her wish to see political process being done to her and others ideals.

She seems to be an astute business woman and they don't throw money away over very minor political whims.




posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 07:02 AM
link   
After the vote to leave the EU I remember wondering how the whole exit thing would try to be blocked and by whom ? There is probably a Soros in the wood pile someplace but as usual he is well hidden... Maybe not in this case (trying to be fair here) but I have no doubt there are others being paid to disparage and block efforts to remove the country from Brussels's management team..



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 07:18 AM
link   
a reply to: Mclaneinc

It's a time game. The only desired outcome is to stall a while. More time to liquidate the assets.



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 07:20 AM
link   
I would actually have more respect for her if she was honest and said her case was all about wanting to stop Brexit - because it is.

The song and dance she is doing about her noble cause to protect democracy is really quite sickening.

It won't matter in the end - parliament will vote to trigger Article 50.

I also have a feeling Farage will be talking to Trump to put some pressure on - after all a country that ignores it's people will be seen as an enemy to democracy and should really be sanctioned (or at least put to the back of the queue with any trade deal)
edit on 24/1/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 07:23 AM
link   
MP should vote the way there constituants voted in the referendem.

If they dont they are traiters to the people.



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 07:59 AM
link   
a reply to: Mclaneinc

As I understand it she has become the face of the challenge but there are others involved in bringing and funding the case along with her , not sure of her and their motivation for it though other than business.



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 08:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Mclaneinc

It's a time game. The only desired outcome is to stall a while. More time to liquidate the assets.


The globalists keep on shooting themselves in the foot, too. What message do they think this is sending to the people of France and Holland, Germany, with elections coming up..? Basically the unelected overlords preside over a club that is harder to get out of than a time share presentation.
edit on 24/1/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 08:28 AM
link   
a reply to: Mclaneinc

If we take her at face value, it is about determining the primacy of Parliament over the PM and Monarch (as May was potentially going to use the Royal Prerogative). At face value, i would support this - don't forget we fought 2 civil wars over this type of issue.

Any issues of national importance that permanently affect this nation are supposed to be taken through Parliament first. So, again, at face value she is correct with her court case.

I think the reason this is garnering so much media hype is because many now fear that Parliament will ignore the wishes of the people. As i have said many times on here, i personally can't see this happening as any MP's seeking re-election know they will fail (unless they represent areas that said no).



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 08:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
I would actually have more respect for her if she was honest and said her case was all about wanting to stop Brexit - because it is.

The song and dance she is doing about her noble cause to protect democracy is really quite sickening.

It won't matter in the end - parliament will vote to trigger Article 50.

I also have a feeling Farage will be talking to Trump to put some pressure on - after all a country that ignores it's people will be seen as an enemy to democracy and should really be sanctioned (or at least put to the back of the queue with any trade deal)
How true that is! She should be tried for treason and hung!



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 08:32 AM
link   
That they are! Labour party already is!



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 08:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
That they are! Labour party already is!


Corbyn has said it should be debated in Parliament but he certainly won't recommend Labour blocking it. He has said this on record.......so we shall see. He also said he may use the Party Whips to ensure that MP's don't block it.



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 08:42 AM
link   
See VID posted by Morrad

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 08:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Flavian

originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
That they are! Labour party already is!


Corbyn has said it should be debated in Parliament but he certainly won't recommend Labour blocking it. He has said this on record.......so we shall see. He also said he may use the Party Whips to ensure that MP's don't block it.


We have to keep a close eye on it... the money and favours will already be being negotiated. Each MP is now sitting on a big bargaining chip... expect them to play their cards close to their chests and send out signals for bribes and deals. The game being played now will be for each MP to position themselves in a group that could decide the outcome.



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 08:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Flavian

originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
That they are! Labour party already is!


Corbyn has said it should be debated in Parliament but he certainly won't recommend Labour blocking it. He has said this on record.......so we shall see. He also said he may use the Party Whips to ensure that MP's don't block it.
I would trust any party on BREXIT right now. For me the people have spoken and all the shinnies won't ever change that! If we dont brexit then democracy in the UK will be dead and all that will entail.



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 08:45 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Well what do you expect? It's class warfare in a constitutional democracy. Basically. You can't make omelette without breaking eggs.
edit on 24-1-2017 by Peeple because: Imperfect



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 08:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruthWhat message do they think this is sending to the people of France and Holland, Germany, with elections coming up..?


Well, being one of those "people" of Holland, I can tell you what message she sends me: that democracy, thank Goodness, is far more resilient against populism than the populists hope it is.



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 09:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Mclaneinc

It's a time game. The only desired outcome is to stall a while. More time to liquidate the assets.


Its that but there's more, I can feel it..



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 09:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: crazyewok
MP should vote the way there constituants voted in the referendem.

If they dont they are traiters to the people.


They have been there and had multiple tee shirts for that one...

Sadly the old Joke

How do you know when a Politician is lying?

His her mouth moves..

Is no longer that funny as its long since been a daily occurrence..

Remember, there ARE WMD's, I've seen the intel...T.Blair at the Hospital having his nose shortened...
edit on 24-1-2017 by Mclaneinc because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 09:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Flavian

originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
That they are! Labour party already is!


Corbyn has said it should be debated in Parliament but he certainly won't recommend Labour blocking it. He has said this on record.......so we shall see. He also said he may use the Party Whips to ensure that MP's don't block it.


We have to keep a close eye on it... the money and favours will already be being negotiated. Each MP is now sitting on a big bargaining chip... expect them to play their cards close to their chests and send out signals for bribes and deals. The game being played now will be for each MP to position themselves in a group that could decide the outcome.


Yes indeed, so many private interests to keep sweet..



posted on Jan, 24 2017 @ 09:09 AM
link   
Maybe she thinks she can carry on making obscene amounts of money off charities if we stay in the EU but might have to get a real job if we leave?

Or she could just be a rabid remainer full of hate .




top topics



 
4
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join