It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Turin Shroud "not a medieval fake"

page: 1

log in


posted on Jan, 29 2005 @ 06:41 PM

PARIS (Reuters) - The Shroud of Turin, which some Christians believe is Jesus Christ's burial cloth, may not be the fake scientific tests
have concluded because they analysed a patch put on it, according to a U.S. scientist.

Raymond N. Rogers of the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico published a paper this week arguing that new dating tests
showed the 1988 tests were from a cloth patch probably sewn on after a fire damaged the Shroud in 1532.

The linen Shroud measuring 4.4 by 1.2 metres bears the image, eerily reversed like a photographic negative, of a crucified man believers
say was Christ.

One of Christianity's most disputed relics, it is locked away at Turin Cathedral in Italy and rarely exhibited. It was last on display in 2000 and
may not be shown again until 2025.

Radiocarbon dating tests by laboratories in Oxford, Zurich and Tucson, Arizona in 1988 caused a sensation by dating it from between 1260
and 1390. Sceptics said it was a hoax, possibly made to attract the profitable medieval pilgrimage business.

But Rogers, writing in the scientific review Thermochimica Acta on Friday, wrote: "The dye found on the radiocarbon sample was not used
in Europe before about 1291."

"The radiocarbon sample was thus not part of the original cloth and is invalid for determining the age of the shroud," he wrote in the article
on the Internet (

Rogers said one dating test, which measures the gradual disappearance of the compound vanillin in linen, found it was present in the patch
analysed in 1988 but not on the main body of the Shroud.

He said linens found with the Dead Sea Scrolls, which date back to the time of Christ, also show no vanillin. He estimated the Shroud could
be anywhere from 1,300 to 3,000 years old.

Scientists are at a loss to explain how the image was made and most agree it could not have been painted or printed.

posted on Jan, 29 2005 @ 06:45 PM
Awesome report bud.
I will need to close it though as this news is being covered and discussed in the thread listed below.

Turin Shroud 3000 years old?

Closing Thread

new topics

log in