It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump to approve Dakota Access Pipeline next week

page: 2
16
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 05:59 PM
link   
a reply to: windword

No it's not this was from another article that wasn't full of # he sold off most of his share awhile ago.

read my above post if you are still confused.



This summer, Trump's most recent financial disclosure form said he owned between $15,000 and $50,000 of Energy Transfer Partners' stock,


same link..

Trump sells his stake in Dakota Access Pipeline developer
edit on 23-1-2017 by Reverbs because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:00 PM
link   
a reply to: TiredofControlFreaks

I don't care.

It's sheer stupidity to build a pipeline across a LAKE.

So they get an intake big whoop!!

Means fresh oil in a catastrophic event.



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:00 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

Interesting.



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:01 PM
link   
a reply to: starwarsisreal

That community had every opportunity to decline the DAPL for years of hearings, but they refused to show up or even be represented at the meetings, but you won't here that on the MSM.



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: TiredofControlFreaks

I don't care.

It's sheer stupidity to build a pipeline across a LAKE.

So they get an intake big whoop!!

Means fresh oil in a catastrophic event.


exactly.. Not sure why everyone is arguing money here..
It's uneeded when you can just say what you said.



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Reverbs

Okay, if you say so. But, it couldn't have been that long ago, because his financial reports from this past summer include his holdings in the pipeline, even though they are smaller.



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:03 PM
link   
a reply to: starwarsisreal

They will say "Psh, they're overreacting, what's the worst the could happen anyway? American oil can only be a good thing because it will help us become the isolationist paradise our God Emperor Trump has envisioned! Plus I heard some of the protestors threw rocks so they're clearly terrorists"



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:03 PM
link   
Any moves that make this country less dependent on foreign oil, and the death grip on the US economy they have should be applauded.

imo



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Reverbs

Okay, if you say so. But, it couldn't have been that long ago, because his financial reports from this past summer include his holdings in the pipeline, even though they are smaller.



READ if you must this is from December

Trump sells his stake in Dakota Access Pipeline developer

And it was longer ago that he sold off almost all of it except 50,000.





His True motive is to become more energy independent..
He's going to keep things like this rolling.

edit on 23-1-2017 by Reverbs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:07 PM
link   
First , this pipeline IS NOT on Native American soil . It violates no contracts with the Native American population
Second , There are literally HUNDREDS of pipelines that follow the same course.
So , if it is on PRIVATE land and hundreds of pipelines are already there (and some have been there for generations of Native Americans) why did they fight do hard for this one ?
Start your brain before you put your fingers in gear on the keyboard.Use intelligence not emotion.



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:08 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96


It's sheer stupidity to build a pipeline across a LAKE.


You are not aware the DAPL follows an existing pipeline at that exact spot? How to you propose to deal with water crossings?



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: neo96



You are not aware the DAPL follows an existing pipeline at that exact spot? How to you propose to deal with water crossings?


I was.. Unaware.

too many things to research too little time.


edit on 23-1-2017 by Reverbs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:11 PM
link   
More great news. It's been a very impressive day.
If he keeps this level up he will change the world in 2 years , not just America.

edit on 23/1/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Reverbs


I did read your link. This is where I got my information.


This summer, Trump's most recent financial disclosure form said he owned between $15,000 and $50,000 of Energy Transfer Partners' stock, so the sale must have taken place since then.


As I said, if you say so. It must have happened recently. It's significantly less than the amount he was said to have owned in the article that I linked, $500K to 1 Million. So, did he sell it all, or most of it?



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:12 PM
link   
a reply to: heyguysimashill


Plus I heard some of the protestors threw rocks so they're clearly terrorists"


The protestors also burned down machinery worth millions of dollars. But I'm sure you'll be more interested in this:

DAPL protestors torturing wildlife



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: ausername
Any moves that make this country less dependent on foreign oil, and the death grip on the US economy they have should be applauded.

imo


Any move ?

Like the Road Runner/Bugs Bunny hour show of building a pipeline across a lake ?

How about we start adding the word 'smart' in front of infrastructure instead.

Smart infrastructure not dumb.


edit on 23-1-2017 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Reverbs


I was.. Unaware.

too many things to research too little time.

DAPL follows existing crossing



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: neo96


It's sheer stupidity to build a pipeline across a LAKE.


You are not aware the DAPL follows an existing pipeline at that exact spot? How to you propose to deal with water crossings?


Two wrongs don't make a right.



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:16 PM
link   
a reply to: windword

I have more...

I did a lot of research on this over the months.



Trump’s share, which in a May 2015 disclosure was listed at between $500,000 and $1 million, had fallen to less than $50,000 by the time he sold it in the summer of 2016, according to a disclosure earlier this year.

The sale would eliminate one possible conflict of interest for Trump, who has vowed to speed up permits for oil and gas pipelines in order to spur more oil and gas development in the United States.

Link

Huffington post quotes the same numbers if you want to go find that one.

Even Snopes didn't mix up 15,000 to 50,000 in stock with 50,000 in interest.


edit on 23-1-2017 by Reverbs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2017 @ 06:18 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96


Two wrongs don't make a right.


Give up fossil fuels for a week or two and get back to us.



new topics

top topics



 
16
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join