Trump to approve Dakota Access Pipeline next week

a reply to: windword

No it's not this was from another article that wasn't full of # he sold off most of his share awhile ago.

read my above post if you are still confused.

This summer, Trump's most recent financial disclosure form said he owned between $15,000 and $50,000 of Energy Transfer Partners' stock,

same link..

Trump sells his stake in Dakota Access Pipeline developer

a reply to: TiredofControlFreaks

I don't care.

It's sheer stupidity to build a pipeline across a LAKE.

So they get an intake big whoop!!

Means fresh oil in a catastrophic event.

a reply to: D8Tee

Interesting.

a reply to: starwarsisreal

That community had every opportunity to decline the DAPL for years of hearings, but they refused to show up or even be represented at the meetings, but you won't here that on the MSM.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: TiredofControlFreaks

I don't care.

It's sheer stupidity to build a pipeline across a LAKE.

So they get an intake big whoop!!

Means fresh oil in a catastrophic event.

exactly.. Not sure why everyone is arguing money here..
It's uneeded when you can just say what you said.

a reply to: Reverbs

Okay, if you say so. But, it couldn't have been that long ago, because his financial reports from this past summer include his holdings in the pipeline, even though they are smaller.

a reply to: starwarsisreal

They will say "Psh, they're overreacting, what's the worst the could happen anyway? American oil can only be a good thing because it will help us become the isolationist paradise our God Emperor Trump has envisioned! Plus I heard some of the protestors threw rocks so they're clearly terrorists"

Any moves that make this country less dependent on foreign oil, and the death grip on the US economy they have should be applauded.

imo

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Reverbs

Okay, if you say so. But, it couldn't have been that long ago, because his financial reports from this past summer include his holdings in the pipeline, even though they are smaller.

READ if you must this is from December

Trump sells his stake in Dakota Access Pipeline developer

And it was longer ago that he sold off almost all of it except 50,000.





His True motive is to become more energy independent..
He's going to keep things like this rolling.

First , this pipeline IS NOT on Native American soil . It violates no contracts with the Native American population
Second , There are literally HUNDREDS of pipelines that follow the same course.
So , if it is on PRIVATE land and hundreds of pipelines are already there (and some have been there for generations of Native Americans) why did they fight do hard for this one ?
Start your brain before you put your fingers in gear on the keyboard.Use intelligence not emotion.

a reply to: neo96

It's sheer stupidity to build a pipeline across a LAKE.

You are not aware the DAPL follows an existing pipeline at that exact spot? How to you propose to deal with water crossings?

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: neo96



You are not aware the DAPL follows an existing pipeline at that exact spot? How to you propose to deal with water crossings?

I was.. Unaware.

too many things to research too little time.

More great news. It's been a very impressive day.
If he keeps this level up he will change the world in 2 years , not just America.

a reply to: Reverbs


I did read your link. This is where I got my information.

This summer, Trump's most recent financial disclosure form said he owned between $15,000 and $50,000 of Energy Transfer Partners' stock, so the sale must have taken place since then.

As I said, if you say so. It must have happened recently. It's significantly less than the amount he was said to have owned in the article that I linked, $500K to 1 Million. So, did he sell it all, or most of it?

a reply to: heyguysimashill

Plus I heard some of the protestors threw rocks so they're clearly terrorists"

The protestors also burned down machinery worth millions of dollars. But I'm sure you'll be more interested in this:

DAPL protestors torturing wildlife

originally posted by: ausername
Any moves that make this country less dependent on foreign oil, and the death grip on the US economy they have should be applauded.

imo

Any move ?

Like the Road Runner/Bugs Bunny hour show of building a pipeline across a lake ?

How about we start adding the word 'smart' in front of infrastructure instead.

Smart infrastructure not dumb.

a reply to: Reverbs

I was.. Unaware.

too many things to research too little time.

DAPL follows existing crossing

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: neo96

It's sheer stupidity to build a pipeline across a LAKE.

You are not aware the DAPL follows an existing pipeline at that exact spot? How to you propose to deal with water crossings?

Two wrongs don't make a right.

a reply to: windword

I have more...

I did a lot of research on this over the months.

Trump’s share, which in a May 2015 disclosure was listed at between $500,000 and $1 million, had fallen to less than $50,000 by the time he sold it in the summer of 2016, according to a disclosure earlier this year.

The sale would eliminate one possible conflict of interest for Trump, who has vowed to speed up permits for oil and gas pipelines in order to spur more oil and gas development in the United States.

Link

Huffington post quotes the same numbers if you want to go find that one.

Even Snopes didn't mix up 15,000 to 50,000 in stock with 50,000 in interest.

a reply to: neo96

Two wrongs don't make a right.

Give up fossil fuels for a week or two and get back to us.