It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Hang in there and reject the deniers. The truth is coming out (looks like this year, but may drag into 2018.)
originally posted by: mersaultdies
First, I apologise for not directly linking to the quotes that I am about to reference. In my defence I am still relatively new to posting on this site rather than just pure rude.
I have a couple of questions that I see as being able to support me in making my mind up on this topic.
1. SOMEBODY (can't remember who) said that geoengineering exists but has nothing to do with chemtrails. Can that person please direct me towards evidence that details the said geoengineering.
2. SOMEBODY indicated that chemtrails aren't true and advocated checking with flight data when you see the trails. Fair enough. What I would like to know is can you direct me to evidence that military planes are NOT releasing chemicals into the air to back up the point of view? By definition, this may be difficult.
3. SOMEBODY claims to have seen enough verifiable evidence and together with his own background knowledge put this together to form a belief that chemtrails are real. I understand you said you 'didn't' have time to make a thread on it. BUT, seriously, for those of us who don't have the same background in aviation it is a lot more difficult to independently research this topic successfully. SO, if what you say is true come on and make a thread detailing your evidence, even if it only references certain things so that we can go away and do the full research if you don't have time to fully explain yourself. Make a thread and lead us to the evidence, please.
Thanks for any help.
3.3 Aerosol distribution and burden We model geoengineering by injection of alumina particles for a number of parametric model scenarios to evaluate the effect of (1) injected particles size, (2) injection rate, and (3) the fractal geometry of sulfate-coated alumina particles. For all scenarios, injection occurs in a broad band from 30◦ S to 30◦ N and from 20 to 25 km in altitude. This is the same injection region used in Pierce et al. (2010) and was chosen to maximize the global distribution and residence time of geoengineered aerosols while minimizing localized injection overlaps.
originally posted by: mersaultdies
Thank you to mrthumpy for that starter information.
To network dude, I would like to read to read and absorb the information from the paper mrthumpy linked to but am about to go to work so don't have time at the moment. That obviously may change my currently very basic and fluid opinions. What I will do is go through it in detail at some point ove the next couple of days and then further reply to this thread. In the meantime, and with the disclaimer that I'm fairly ignorant on this subject...
...I became suspicious as to why there persistent contrails in the sky on some occasions but not others. I looked into it ia bit and found that some people suggested they were linked to geoengineering. I also found that lots of people said that was silly and suggested they were just contrails there due to atmospheric conditions. I then went about my daily life. More recently, I noticed contrails and was at a loose end so decided to check out what planes seemed to be creating them and the concurrent atmospheric conditions. I found that it 'seemed' as if planes flying at different altitudes, where the meterology site told me there were currently different weather conditions, both appeared to be creating persistent contrails. Added to this it 'seemed' as if there were a greater number of planes in the sky than there should have been. So, I thought, perhaps the phenomenom is worth further investigation before I commit to having firm opinions one way or another. Even more recently, I found this thread and though 'Ah, here's the place to look for direction on where I can improve my knowledge on the science around this and hopefully start to figure out the truth (or at the very least my own belief in what may be true)'.
Any direction you can offer at this stage would be appreciated.