Where is the line for you????

I already protested when Obama imported more and more socialism. Been there done that.

originally posted by: Dawgishly
a reply to: JoshuaCox

What if they started interning pro-life supporters or other conservative leaning activists as "domestic terrorists"? Would that be OK? I get the sense you are not thinking that way, but just want you to confirm because the choice of only Muslim internments is curious. The internment of any group right?

For me, if they started allowing Muslims to openly enforce Sharia law in their communities that would be time to hit the streets. One of the leaders of the Women's March wants Sharia law in the US. Sick #.

There are a lot of good Muslims, probably the vast majority of Muslims that are establish citizens in Western countries are good people. But the Koran, the countless radical imams, and the prophet are not good. It is an unholy alliance. When Christians act out and do evil things they can't find any justification, only condemnation, for their evil acts in Christ's teachings. Conversely many devout Muslims find justification in the Koran for their heinous acts. It is disgusting to me that western liberals stand up for a religion that allows beheading non-combatant men, women and children, dropping gays off buildings, honor killing of rape victims or women who marry out of love, pedophilia as in child brides or keeping young boys to rape in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and elsewhere, killing political dissidents, killing apostates, and bombing fellow Muslims because they are not from the right sect. After every terrorist attack, Obama and other liberals were more concerned with defending Islam against imagined counter attacks, then with supporting the grieving families. There is also rampant obstructionist apologists in Europe for immigrants raping, assaulting, and killing EU citizens. I think Shia Muslims are a lot more compatible with Western Culture than are the Sunnis . Alas the Saudis are Sunni and we buddy up with those sick bastards for the oil.

Another massive Wall Street bailout would be another line. I am still supremely pissed that none of those evil, greedy #ing executives went to jail. Even worse, they scape-goated a couple low level analysts. They were basically getting their million dollar bonuses from taxpayer bailouts. How can they live with themselves?

Finally, there is a line for liberals who call out conservatives on dubious accusations of racist, sexist, and homophobic speech, while physically acting out their own hatred for these MSM generated boogeyman. CNN had all these stories about Trump supporters putting racist, sexist, homophobic graffiti on college campuses and minority churches. Meanwhile the only perpetrators actually caught were a couple Jewish college students and a black guy e.g. false flags for a false narrative.

At the same time there were countless videos on alt media of liberals physically assaulting Trump supporters. Those videos got no play or mention on CNN or MSNBC.

Liberals look at Trump as the next Hitler. To be honest I am, as a Trump supporter, on guard about that too and would turn on him in a MFing second if he starts to go down that path. I have no problem with a wall, in fact support it. But if he starts with the restrictions on Muslim US citizens writ large, then that would crossing the line.

All that said, I view this visceral, seething hatred from liberals as a much more likely source of the next genocide.

I think the line is different for everyone. That is why I specifically said "no matter what administration."

With everything it depends on what % of the population agrees with you.

If you far left and think it's time to revolt because pets deserve to be free, or if your far right and feel the same way about abortion, I doubt you have many people join your cause.

The only difference between freedom fighters and traitors is POV.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Some of the points you made are the same ones I would make, except from the other side.

I think deportation should happen. If you are here illegally you should expect to be expelled. I don't want to break up families though, so they are all free to leave. Those same families would have the opportunity to apply to become US citizens but they would have to go through the process like everyone else. Illegal immigrants with felonies, sorry, go home.

I am a staunch supporter of free speech, however, I believe in my heart that the flag should be held to a higher standard, no pun intended. If you want to make an art project that looks like a flag out of paper and burn it, the symbolic gesture is still there. Consider it burning someone in effigy as opposed to burning the real person. It is symbolic but no harm done. I don't like the idea of putting limits on free speech but there already are some, and they are not applied evenly. If you want to throw down a prayer rug in a public school you are free to do so. If you want to sit quietly and pray to yourself with a bible, you are forbidden to do so. If we are supposed to take the separation of church and state to that degree, why is there a position called Senate Chaplain?

As for muslims, I think it is proper to detain someone who may be linked to terrorists. But a blanket internment seems a bit much, though the doctrines of the religion would suggest otherwise.

In the end, any gross violation of the constitution would do it for me. An increase of aggressive asset forfeiture might get me started. Its nothing more than thieves behind badges stealing from people in a system rigged against the victims.

Mass gun confiscation would likely have me doing some very. . . . .rebellious things.

Mass refugee importation by a progressive government would probably have me out protesting.