It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: zosimov
originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: zosimov
War is hell
No excuse. Any sentient being would find this crime odious.
originally posted by: JAY1980
originally posted by: zosimov
originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: zosimov
War is hell
No excuse. Any sentient being would find this crime odious.
Much like the crimes the Nazis committed against the Jew's?
It was a retaliatory response to those horrendous acts. If I remember correct the British and Americans also leveled Berlin simply for posterity sake.
originally posted by: zosimov
a reply to: alldaylong
ONE death by government sanctioned firebombing is reprehensible, let alone thousands.
Who is a more admirable human being: Stalin, Hitler or John Wayne Gacy?
Evil is evil whether it be in response of horrific actions or not. Moral relativity is a dangerous game to play.
originally posted by: alldaylong
originally posted by: zosimov
a reply to: alldaylong
ONE death by government sanctioned firebombing is reprehensible, let alone thousands.
Who is a more admirable human being: Stalin, Hitler or John Wayne Gacy?
Evil is evil whether it be in response of horrific actions or not. Moral relativity is a dangerous game to play.
The actions sanctioned by Churchill where a response to a war instigated by Hitler.
Did you expect Churchill to standby and not respond ?
Maybe Britain should have been like The French, and just let The Nazi's walk in. You would have been happy with that i do believe.
originally posted by: Kryties
Holocaust, torture - MILITARY
Dresden - CIVILIAN
Are we getting the picture now?
originally posted by: zosimov
originally posted by: alldaylong
originally posted by: zosimov
a reply to: alldaylong
ONE death by government sanctioned firebombing is reprehensible, let alone thousands.
Who is a more admirable human being: Stalin, Hitler or John Wayne Gacy?
Evil is evil whether it be in response of horrific actions or not. Moral relativity is a dangerous game to play.
The actions sanctioned by Churchill where a response to a war instigated by Hitler.
Did you expect Churchill to standby and not respond ?
Maybe Britain should have been like The French, and just let The Nazi's walk in. You would have been happy with that i do believe.
Please inform us how bombing a civilian city gave Britains a tactical advantage over their enemy.
originally posted by: Kryties
a reply to: ketsuko
There's a HUGE difference between what the German and Jap MILITARY did, as opposed to how Churchill bombed a city full of CIVILIANS.
Military and Civilians are two separate things, you know this right?
originally posted by: pteridine
originally posted by: Kryties
a reply to: ketsuko
There's a HUGE difference between what the German and Jap MILITARY did, as opposed to how Churchill bombed a city full of CIVILIANS.
Military and Civilians are two separate things, you know this right?
Look up "London Blitz" and get back to us about who threw the first stone.
originally posted by: alldaylong
originally posted by: zosimov
originally posted by: alldaylong
originally posted by: zosimov
a reply to: alldaylong
ONE death by government sanctioned firebombing is reprehensible, let alone thousands.
Who is a more admirable human being: Stalin, Hitler or John Wayne Gacy?
Evil is evil whether it be in response of horrific actions or not. Moral relativity is a dangerous game to play.
The actions sanctioned by Churchill where a response to a war instigated by Hitler.
Did you expect Churchill to standby and not respond ?
Maybe Britain should have been like The French, and just let The Nazi's walk in. You would have been happy with that i do believe.
Please inform us how bombing a civilian city gave Britains a tactical advantage over their enemy.
You could ask the same question of Nazi Germany.
London
Birmingham
Coventry
Sheffield
Liverpool
Cardiff
Manchester
The list goes on.
originally posted by: Kryties
a reply to: ketsuko
There was simply NO reason to bomb Dresden. The war was nearly over, the Germans were already in retreat.
originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: xuenchen
That is awesome! I never understood that blatantly biased...or should I say racist move by Obammy