It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And the downside is???
originally posted by: lostbook
We're in for an interesting 4 years...! I came across this article where it says that Donald Trump plans to eliminate the National Endowment for the Arts and Humanities. This is based on the beluief that taxpayers shouldn't have to pay for creative ventures especially, since private donors contribute to the Arts.
On 19 January 2017, The Hill, citing unnamed sources from inside President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team, reported that (among other cuts) Trump plans to eliminate the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities: The National Endowment for the Arts and National Endowment for the Humanities would be eliminated entirely. According to their website, the National Endowment of the Arts is: an independent federal agency that funds, promotes, and strengthens the creative capacity of our communities by providing all Americans with diverse opportunities for arts participation. The National Endowment for the Humanities describes their mission in the following way: Because democracy demands wisdom, NEH serves and strengthens our republic by promoting excellence in the humanities and conveying the lessons of history to all Americans. The Endowment accomplishes this mission by awarding grants for top-rated proposals examined by panels of independent, external reviewers.
I am speechless, ATS but somehow I feel that this is just the beginning of some shocking revelations brought to you and I by the Trumpster. If this comes to pass then what else could be on the chopping block? Planned Parenthood, Public Education, Healthcare? Trump is now in a position of immense power. Do you think he'll do what's right for the average American or his rich powerful friends? What says ATS?
www.snopes.com...
Trump Reportedly Plans to Eliminate National Endowments for the Arts, Humanities
originally posted by: Tardacus
This is a no brainer, 20 trillion in debt says of course we can`t afford to be funding endowment for the arts.
when we have to borrow to pay for the essentials to keep the country running then we need to cut the unnecessary spending.It`s simple finances,not rocket science.
As the Washington Post’s Philip Bump illustrated, removing these programs would make a remarkably small dent in federal spending (each received $148 million —0.003 percent of the federal budget — in 2016):
originally posted by: lostbook
I see that most are pro-Trump on this issue. I think I already know this answer but what about other government funded programs such as NASA? What about other programs which he doesn't think benefit Americans are cut?
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: lostbook
I see that most are pro-Trump on this issue. I think I already know this answer but what about other government funded programs such as NASA? What about other programs which he doesn't think benefit Americans are cut?
Explain to me how funding artists to place crosses in jars of urine benefits the average Joe on the street?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: lostbook
OK.
Here's the deal: We live in a country that is $20trillion in debt. The harsh truth is that spending needs to be cut. The only other alternative is to take ever more from people. Either way, it "could affect" my family.
Paying for artists to slap a couple of stark white canvases on a wall, for example, is not nearly as important as other programs. So, yes, I would rather art funding get cut before those other things.
What makes an artist who calls stark white canvas "art" more deserving of government subsidy than a veteran? Or maybe someone who has worked until retirement?
originally posted by: carewemust
I would recommend withholding Billions of our taxpayer dollars from countries that don't like us, first.