It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump may be one of the most courageous men of our time

page: 5
108
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 06:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Vector99

The issue of his companies and businesses is not resolved to a proper degree. Divestiture would have been the only way to absolutely banish the question of his businesses, but Trump, unsurprisingly failed to agree to that.




posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 06:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: GoShredAK
a reply to: TrueBrit

I don't feel I assumed that much. It is a fact that he entered the campaign and was met with ridicule, he persevered and ended up winning the nomination.

He truly did place himself at odds with Hillary Clinton and didn't hold back where others surely would have.

He brought up allegations of rape by Bill straight to his face. Bill had such a look of hatred on his face I don't think it could possibly be faked.

He really has claimed at his rallies that the entire establishment is corrupt, so he knows who he is fighting against.

He really has left his regular life behind to pursue the presidency.

All of those things happened, not assumptions.

The only assumptions I feel I have made are that he may truly be genuine. That he is smart enough to know the danger he is in.




Think of how you would do it.

What you would have to do, to run for potus if you were a billionaire.

He did exactly what a guy who cares about his country would do.

Called it like it is, called out people, used own money, had good ideas, worked 24/7, took on everyone.

Mofo is 70 and rich. Like he needs this BS as a joke.

Just kicking the press in the balls is worth it.

MAGA!

Too bad ol blue eyes ain't around for a tribute.










posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 06:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Vector99

The issue of his companies and businesses is not resolved to a proper degree. Divestiture would have been the only way to absolutely banish the question of his businesses, but Trump, unsurprisingly failed to agree to that.



Oh blow me about that crap.

Tell mr. heinz 57 the same thing.




posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 06:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: DJW001

You're questioning his taste in women? Your waaay better than that.


No, I'm questioning his priorities. Shouldn't a President put the good of the nation above all else?

You do realize he just handed over billions in control to his family. Say what you want, but most people would not do that under any circumstance, even and ESPECIALLY to family. It's easy to say you would though.


How is that surprising? They have always been deeply involved in his business....anyone whose done 10 min or research on trump would know that



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 06:48 AM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy


Trump ran to stay in the line light....he did it for the attention ad for his brand ....he kept going as long as it would last and his ego wouldn't let him stop...

And Americans bought his drivel hook line and sinker

Trump cares about Trump and nothing else



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 06:49 AM
link   
a reply to: GoShredAK

His cabinet alone says he isn't genuine about any of his populist rhetoric.
edit on 20-1-2017 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 06:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask

originally posted by: GoShredAK

originally posted by: Whereismypassword
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

It's all about the Trump brand that's why he talks about himself in 3rd person because he is always selling his brand

I hope he surprises many of us doubters but I get the feeling his presidential run is more about his brand



If that were the case he is still super ballsy because he would still be risking getting murdered.

I doubt he would be taking that risk for his brand, I think its possible he may have an aspiration to go down In history as a great leader.


He's not taking any more of a risk than any other president....

This is the best thing that could happen for his brand....President Trump? With his name already on so many things and buildings? Are you kidding??


He is taking far more risk than most of the other presidents. He has already been very critical of the establishment, he has made it clear that he will not be controlled as he implements his own system with total disregard to the current agenda.

The last president who refused to be controlled, and revealed his good intentions for peace, which went against the establishment at the time, was JFK.

All the others seemed to be nothing more than willing puppets. They were in much less danger than JFK or Donald Trump.



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 06:53 AM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy

That crap?

Explain to me how this is crap. How many other US presidents do you suppose refused to do the right thing and put everything into a REAL blind trust, run by someone other than his family members? Name a few, go ahead. Oh thats right, its not a done thing is it? No, because of course, he is immune to conflict of interest laws, so if he does not put things in a blind trust to which none of his family have access, you cannot trust that he will not be making choices which benefit his businesses in a biased way.

But who cares right? I mean, theres only the matter of his nine figure debt to foreign nations to worry about after that, and given that the people who elected this man seem not to give a damn about any of the rest of his intensely shady, part of the problem behaviour over the decades of his career, why would they have a problem with a President who cannot be trusted to do right by them, before doing right by himself?



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 07:04 AM
link   
a reply to: GoShredAK

Comparing trump to JFK like his supporters do, brings shame to JFK please stop

Second there's nothing more than conspiracy that the gov had him killed, in fact there is a few gr at documentaries that have pretty damn good evidence that it was an accident by the secret service agent in the car behind him that accidentally shot him when Oswald missed his first shot, and the agent raised his rifle when the shot rang out

So can we please knock off the comparison

3rd. We already have a system , he can't just make up his own....that's dictator territory



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 07:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: TrueAmerican

a reply to: GoShredAK

If you allow yourselves to pick between two turds, then the problem is you get a turd. You have a turd. Pretending that one turd is better than another, rather than just differently disgusting, is a habit which is programmed behaviour, something which you should both know better than to indulge in, purely by way of being members of this website.

What should have happened, the moment the American people realised that they had only a choice between two different kinds of hell in the election, was a mass walkout and nationwide protest. Shut downs of every major city until both parties scrapped their candidates in favour of ACTUAL representatives, people who were not only saying they represented the people, but were actually OF the people, something which neither Clinton nor Trump could ever say with straight face, because neither of them have ever had to work hard for small rewards. They had their lives handed to them on a plate, and both of them have done little with their advantages, save to damage the lives of others in varying ways.

Just because nuclear oblivion is currently off the table, does not mean that either choice was better than the other. You are all still as boned as you could be, its just a different foreign object that happens to be the culprit.


Put the beer down, pick up the pooper scooper, and clean up your cess pool of a back yard before you vigorously lecture others about how much their yard stinks.


edit on 20-1-2017 by real_one because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 07:14 AM
link   
a reply to: real_one

So he's not allowed to comment on an open forum?

Whatever the case is it doesn't make his assessment any less valid



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 07:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Vector99

The issue of his companies and businesses is not resolved to a proper degree. Divestiture would have been the only way to absolutely banish the question of his businesses, but Trump, unsurprisingly failed to agree to that.

Because not a single individual on this planet would do it to the standards you libs have.

There is a saying in business, and it's don't do business with family.

He has handed everything over legally, that already is a lot more than most sensible businessmen would do. Stop raising the bar and nitpicking in between.



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 07:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: DJW001

You're questioning his taste in women? Your waaay better than that.


No, I'm questioning his priorities. Shouldn't a President put the good of the nation above all else?

You do realize he just handed over billions in control to his family. Say what you want, but most people would not do that under any circumstance, even and ESPECIALLY to family. It's easy to say you would though.


How is that surprising? They have always been deeply involved in his business....anyone whose done 10 min or research on trump would know that

Big difference between being involved and being in charge smart guy, oh that's right you wouldn't know that.



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 07:30 AM
link   
a reply to: real_one

I am about that very business as we speak. No one who supported your puppet can say the same.



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 07:31 AM
link   
if courage has something to do with wealth then sure.

I'm not going talk about his 'personality'. NONE of us can no one in here knows him personally but in that campaign he really liked to attack people on twitter, make moves,make the news ... No matter what anyone tells me he likes to show off his wealth with his buildings and all (one of His buildings located in New York actually made me think about possible False flag/Terror scenario btw)

I hope he helps the poor too.You know I couldn't give a damn about rich Americans having good or better relations with Rich as F russians now that he's in. Thats all a big Kindergarden to me a big show.
You would expect that from wealthy adult people in a normal world. You would also expect that they would not invest retarded amounts of money into building disastrous weapons and army's.

My question is: How much of his investments will be going to the poor in America and All around the world.
edit on 20-1-2017 by Eagleyedobserver because: (no reason given)

edit on 20-1-2017 by Eagleyedobserver because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 07:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: TrueAmerican

a reply to: GoShredAK

If you allow yourselves to pick between two turds, then the problem is you get a turd. You have a turd. Pretending that one turd is better than another, rather than just differently disgusting, is a habit which is programmed behaviour, something which you should both know better than to indulge in, purely by way of being members of this website.

What should have happened, the moment the American people realised that they had only a choice between two different kinds of hell in the election, was a mass walkout and nationwide protest. Shut downs of every major city until both parties scrapped their candidates in favour of ACTUAL representatives, people who were not only saying they represented the people, but were actually OF the people, something which neither Clinton nor Trump could ever say with straight face, because neither of them have ever had to work hard for small rewards. They had their lives handed to them on a plate, and both of them have done little with their advantages, save to damage the lives of others in varying ways.

Just because nuclear oblivion is currently off the table, does not mean that either choice was better than the other. You are all still as boned as you could be, its just a different foreign object that happens to be the culprit.
Isn't your government full of pedophiles? How do you have any time to offer your opinions on our government when you are allowing pdos to run yours?



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 07:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Vector99

The standards we libs have? What do you mean? Having standards is a problem now? Meaningful and effective prevention of interest cross bleed is not an issue then? Really? So what has all the complaining about Hillary and Bill been about (complaint I agree with, by the way)? Was I being a typical lib when I repeatedly pointed out that prior administrations on both sides have profited from war through intermediaries? Was I being overly socialist when I complained that Hillary should not be the candidate for the left, because she is right leaning on foreign affairs, and knows nothing about real life at street level, not having lived a normal life for the vast majority of her pathetic, amoral life?



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 07:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Woodcarver

I can multitask.

Its rather sad when people find it necessary to assume that my capacity is as low as their own. Suffice to say, it is not.



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 07:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: real_one

I am about that very business as we speak. No one who supported your puppet can say the same.
didn't someone sue your family business into the ground?



posted on Jan, 20 2017 @ 07:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Woodcarver

I can multitask.

Its rather sad when people find it necessary to assume that my capacity is as low as their own. Suffice to say, it is not.
Yes but what have you done to push the pedos out of your leadership? Why are you wasting time looking across the pond when you have so much work to do there? One would think your lax interest in cleaning your own house has allowed the roaches free reign.
edit on 20-1-2017 by Woodcarver because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
108
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join