posted on Nov, 21 2017 @ 09:53 AM
originally posted by: Fools
a reply to: joelr
I will have to watch again, I wasn't sure if it had to do with the vector change - but I think that was it.
But that wouldn't explain anything. There are no spacelike vectors when you describe gravitational waves from the sun headed to Earth?
He's presenting it like "Hey everyone look the theory of gravity is wrong because relativity says gravity from the sun reaches Earth instantaneous! So
I'm right and physics is wrong!"
Actually he calls it "spooky action at a distance" so he's clearly borrowing this from entanglement. Or he's an idiot.
He calls Einstein an idiot several times in another video. So it's on.
I watched some of his other videos. He's basically a flat Earther. His thing isn't flat Earth literally, it's platonic philosophical buzzwords applied
to the Electric universe (magnetism is the only real thing and space-time and light are by-products) and he's like a rebel against quantum
He's got this weird following of people that believe mathematical theories are bunk and his weird word salad, no-math, anti modern physics rants are
actually coherent and possibly genius.
I think the no-math thing is something he presents in another video.
He doesn't seem to understand the double slit experiment at all. He has lots of videos "explaining" the double slit experiment but all he does is give
an alternate hypothesis about what causes light interference.
But his no-math idea is for photons and not other particles so that doesn't make sense.
He doesn't mention the observer problem either. So it's just a thing for physics illiterate people to get exited about.
The way he puts down science and ad homs everyone except Tesla and strokes his ego is kind of cult leader-y.
All his videos have a "donate $$$$$$" thing right in the front so I think he's just working a little angle.
It's really weird reading the comments. People think he's really smart and on to something. But he has no science background so he doesn't even
understand what he's debunking nor does he have any mathematical framework to replace or predict anything new. But people love it?