It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Anonymous Just Took An Interest In Donald Trump’s Russian Lady Pee Saga (TWEETS)

page: 1
18
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:11 AM
link   

YourAnonCentral, an account used by the hacktivist collective to relay information during the protests in Ferguson and during other times of strife, made sure that Trump knows they are watching him:

They got straight to the point.

@YourAnonCentral .@realDonaldTrump you have financial and personal ties with Russian mobsters, child traffickers, and money launderers. 4:44 PM - 15 Jan 2017 748 748 Retweets 1,482 1,482 likes

They oughta know.

@YourAnonCentral This isn't the 80's any longer, information doesn't vanish, it is all out there. You are going to regret the next 4 years. @realDonaldTrump 4:47 PM - 15 Jan 2017 483 483 Retweets 1,242 1,242 likes

This should give the information that has been circulating about Trump more credibility. Not that it needs more credibility, just that all his supporters keep saying it is fake news.
The last tweet really cracks me up. They seem to be telling the Trump team not to try and beat them at their own game.

@YourAnonCentral Oh and please tell your interns not to waste money hitting us with your Moldavian bot farm, stay frosty @realDonaldTrump. 4:54 PM - 15 Jan 2017 222 222 Retweets 779 779 likes

Keep tweeting Donald!
Source



+20 more 
posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:15 AM
link   
Well that all seems credible



posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:16 AM
link   
Well this should be interesting. Anon more or less started out as the hacker arm of 4chan. The same site that claims they concocted the whole golden shower story in the first place.


+4 more 
posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:19 AM
link   
Does it even matter if Trump had a woman pee on him?

Most of us have fetishes. Long as they dont hurt anyone who cares



posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:21 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 


+11 more 
posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Icarus Rising

YourAnonCentral only represents half of what's currently understood to be Anonymous.
The other half is looking out for Trump.


+10 more 
posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:24 AM
link   
a reply to: Icarus Rising

"This should give the information that has been circulating about Trump more credibility"

No. It doesent. At all. I have no idea why you even think it does.
edit on 16-1-2017 by omniEther because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:34 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

I wasn't aware there were political factions within Anonymous. I am curious to see how this story develops. I wonder if the Moldavian bot farm had anything to do with the

Unusual Pattern of Fake Political Tweets Coming From Georgia
In the month leading up to the presidential election in early November, as many as 15% of all politically oriented tweets may have come from automated social media robot systems, according to a new study from researchers at the University of Southern California’s Information Sciences Institute. The vast majority of postings by these Twitter bots featured pro-Donald Trump messages, while many others contained anti-Hillary Clinton content. But in what is perhaps the strangest and most inexplicable finding of all, the bulk of these non-human tweets appear to be coming from the state of Georgia.

Source


+24 more 
posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:35 AM
link   
Has Anonymous---no matter which faction--ever accomplished anything but make sucky videos/threats they never deliver on? Serious question.
edit on 16-1-2017 by The GUT because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:36 AM
link   
a reply to: omniEther

I think it is pretty clear why I think it does give the information circulating about Trump more credibility. Because a group known for exposing elitist lies is now saying it. What makes you think it doesn't give the information more credibility?



posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:37 AM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

Yes they have you should look into it.
Plenty in fact.

Although I'm still waiting for the details of #OpDeathEaters.

They've kinda dropped the ball on that one.



posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: Icarus Rising
a reply to: omniEther

I think it is pretty clear why I think it does give the information circulating about Trump more credibility. Because a group known for exposing elitist lies is now saying it. What makes you think it doesn't give the information more credibility?


Kool Aid.


+3 more 
posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: Icarus Rising
Not that it needs more credibility


So being completely unsourced and lacking ANY shred of evidence equals credibility to you?



posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Icarus Rising

YourAnonCentral only represents half of what's currently understood to be Anonymous.
The other half is looking out for Trump.


Yeah they hails from the ultra left wing "debate & Discussion" forums on somethingawful.com. My old stomping grounds until they went full liberal totalitarian.



posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:41 AM
link   
a reply to: The GUT
Ok. Here you go.

Anonymous Top 10 Accomplishments

Source



posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:41 AM
link   



posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: The GUT

Yes they have you should look into it.
Plenty in fact.

Although I'm still waiting for the details of #OpDeathEaters.

They've kinda dropped the ball on that one.
well, since you said it, I gots to believe you, but for those who don't have 110% faith in you, could you maybe post a link or elaborate a bit?



posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:46 AM
link   
a reply to: TheBulk

Just because sources are yet to be revealed doesn't mean the material is unsourced. We know who compiled it and who ordered it investigated. The rest will come to light moving forward. A discerning person with moderate exposure to Western society looking at the public record of Trump's activities and behaviors over the last ten years could certainly deduce much the same conclusions as contained in the dossier. I did.



posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:46 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

Why would I lie about that, mate?

Come now, we have our disagreements, but I'm far from a bullsh*t artist.


Links above you.

edit on 16-1-2017 by Hazardous1408 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 16 2017 @ 11:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Icarus Rising
a reply to: TheBulk

Just because sources are yet to be revealed doesn't mean the material is unsourced. We know who compiled it and who ordered it investigated. The rest will come to light moving forward. A discerning person with moderate exposure to Western society looking at the public record of Trump's activities and behaviors over the last ten years could certainly deduce much the same conclusions as contained in the dossier. I did.


This is what's called "grasping straws".



new topics

top topics



 
18
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join