It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

This is why I think Trump never conspired with Putin

page: 3
14
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 09:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: banjobrain

originally posted by: thesaneone

originally posted by: banjobrain

originally posted by: JeremySun
a reply to: mOjOm

Only a few bankruptcies out of hundreds of new businesses over many decades. Very little risk.


only 4,000 law suits in his life

haha

little risk,oops gotta run, I have a law suit to attend to
haha



Doesn't Walmart get sued around 5000 times a year?


That is not a good point FYI




Why not?




posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 09:48 PM
link   
Not a single person has 4000 lawsuits. Big corporations like the Trump organization do. If Donald Trump has 4000 lawsuits, he'd be in court all day every day.



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 09:51 PM
link   
a reply to: JeremySun

He doesn't have to collude with Putin personally. He's not dumb enough to make it that easy. In fact there is no plausible deniability in that.

He has friends and family that are friendly with Russian money and power. He is surrounded and in contact with some of the most powerful and connected people in the world.

He's part of the group of people who are running the world. Although until now I don't think he was considered a Major Player, but this may change that. But he's certainly a player. He's not an outsider of anything.

This is being controlled and it has been to various degrees from the start. These people don't lose. They just switch tactics but they control both sides, all sides so they always come out on top. Trump is now part of this game and is playing his part like a true sociopathic corporate hammer looking for nails.



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 10:04 PM
link   
Why would Donald Trump risk EVERYTHING including his whole family just for some Podesta emails? Not even Hillary emails. Not even much dirt in them. Not even covered by MSM. Not even seen by anyone who is not already a Trump supporter. US intelligence and investigative journalists find EVERYTHING. There's NOTHING they can't find. He's not crazy. He's not stupid.

Ergo, he did not make that risk.



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 10:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: banjobrain

only 4,000 law suits in his life

haha

little risk,oops gotta run, I have a law suit to attend to
haha


neener neener.

He won most of the credible ones.

Legal affairs of Donald Trump



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 10:10 PM
link   
If he did colluded, it would have been found out already. Even Michael Flynn talking with the Russian ambassador after the US sanctions last month was found out. You think if Trump did that and was never found out? Not a chance.
edit on 13-1-2017 by JeremySun because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 10:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: JeremySun
If he did colluded, it would have been found out already. Even Michael Flynn talking with the Russian ambassador after the US sanctions last month was found out. You think if Trump did that and was never found out? Not a chance.


Not a chance in hell with NSA spying.

One of my friends went to work there. Computer programmer..

Never heard from him again.

He can run circles around hackers.

NSA has all the data.. All you have to do like a google search.. Type in Trump... And you have all of it.

The more these people lie and fight the more they screw themselves.
edit on 13-1-2017 by Reverbs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 10:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Reverbs

That, and American investigative journalists uncover everything, including his 1995 tax returns, his Hollywood Access tape, him having bought Chinese steel, all his dirt in the election. If he colluded with Russia, you think they wouldn't have found out? BS.

If he colluded with Putin, he might have gotten some useless Podesta emails no one cares about, but he would have lost the election and his family would have became dirt poor and he would have went to jail for treason.
edit on 13-1-2017 by JeremySun because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 10:34 PM
link   
a reply to: JeremySun

Because there is no proof is the simple answer. Until then it is conspiracy theory, or worse.



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 10:36 PM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

If he did it would have been found out. American investigative journalists are a pack of wolves.



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 10:38 PM
link   
He won because Hillary is dishonest, fake, and bat crap crazy. He doesn't need Putin, and never did. Putin respects Trump, because he is a hard ass, that gets results. That's how many Americans see Trump too. He is doing this for America, and if he succeeds, all he will get is a feather in his cap.



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 10:42 PM
link   
If you think about it. Would you risk your life to get 1 dollar if you already have 100000 dollars? That's what Trump would have risked if he colluded with Putin for some Podesta emails.
edit on 13-1-2017 by JeremySun because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 14 2017 @ 12:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: JeremySun

Really???? Another opinion thread dedicated to kissing Trumps butt. That's the third one today. By a new member even.

You may want to try and hide some of that agenda bias there buddy. You're really giving yourself away here.

Gonna have to be more subtle in your misinformation next time Barron Von Putin.

This post is sponsored by the rational, peaceful ctrl-left. We now resume your normal broadcast already in progress.



posted on Jan, 14 2017 @ 02:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: visitedbythem
He won because Hillary is dishonest, fake, and bat crap crazy. He doesn't need Putin, and never did. Putin respects Trump, because he is a hard ass, that gets results. That's how many Americans see Trump too. He is doing this for America, and if he succeeds, all he will get is a feather in his cap.


BUT

Americans stand to lose or gain.

Obama did what? 9 trillion in new debt? As in at least doubled our debt. For what? What did we get out of that? Mostly bombing people with no criminal recourse, and bailing out banks that are not part of the government.... They are companies.... If instead they sent that same money to little people the effects would trickle down.... trickle down into the dark deep pores of USURY!



It might be true he saved us from a depression. I don't know how to calculate that.... It's a far cry from Clinton balancing the budget.

Obama seemed to me like a bankers/lawyers president.

I can only hope Trump is not a corporate president.

We shall see.
edit on 14-1-2017 by Reverbs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 14 2017 @ 02:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Reverbs

Well, he's going to lower taxes and spend more money.
Maybe my math is fuzzy but I can't see how that lowers the deficit.

Oh wait. He's going to end government waste. I forgot that part.



edit on 1/14/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 14 2017 @ 02:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Reverbs

Well, he's going to lower taxes and spend more money.
Maybe my math is fuzzy but I can't see how that lowers the deficit.

Oh wait. He's going to end government waste. I forgot that part.




what is that in response to?

I don't like trump.

And I would be hard pressed to find any solid policies put forth..



BUT I do remember you being too old to see smoke on a screen...
You are old. And you are not debating points.
I wish you would make posts that were more than 2 lines long.
Maybe then we could talk.
Maybe your old ass has some knowledge for us kids..

but you don't ever show it.



edit on 14-1-2017 by Reverbs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 14 2017 @ 02:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Reverbs

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Reverbs

Well, he's going to lower taxes and spend more money.
Maybe my math is fuzzy but I can't see how that lowers the deficit.

Oh wait. He's going to end government waste. I forgot that part.




what is that in response to?




This:

Obama did what? 9 trillion in new debt?



posted on Jan, 14 2017 @ 02:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I'm a leftie in case you got confused.



posted on Jan, 14 2017 @ 02:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Reverbs

Confused? Me?
Was my response inappropriate?



posted on Jan, 14 2017 @ 02:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Reverbs

Confused? Me?
Was my response inappropriate?


Yes it seems so

Now you are asking.

I would like my elders to have solid points and not one liners.


please let us be on topic.

Say something meaningful.

You are older and smarter than me.

tell me your thoughts.
edit on 14-1-2017 by Reverbs because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
14
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join