It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

This is why I think Trump never conspired with Putin

page: 1
14
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:25 PM
link   
It's too risky. No one would risk that. The Podesta emails are minor and they contained very little dirt. They are not even Hillary's emails. The MSM other than Fox News never covered the Podesta emails. Only Fox News covered them a little bit. They were mostly covered by Trump himself. Liberals and independents don't watch Fox News or Trump's rallies. Only Trump's own supports ever seen the Podesta emails. The Podesta emails had no effect on the election because liberals and independents didn't see Podesta's emails.




posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:30 PM
link   
a reply to: JeremySun

Really???? Another opinion thread dedicated to kissing Trumps butt. That's the third one today. By a new member even.

You may want to try and hide some of that agenda bias there buddy. You're really giving yourself away here.

Gonna have to be more subtle in your misinformation next time Barron Von Putin.



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:33 PM
link   
The Chinese have a good saying. Ruo yao ren bu zhi guo bu jue, chu fei ji mo wei. If you don't want people or ghosts to know what you did, the only way is never do it in the first place.

Of course Trump would never risk it by conspiring with Putin. He could easily win the election all by himself.



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:39 PM
link   
a reply to: JeremySun

Americans have a good saying too, "Something around here doesn't smell right." Which means someone's not being honest and their story is Bullsh*t.

Sorta cuts right to the chase doesn't it??



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:39 PM
link   
Amazing. Your exuberance over victory comes under fire right off the bat.
Pay no attention to bitter losers.

Great points, newish member...and I agree with them.
Trump is great...and haters gonna hate.



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: JeremySun

Americans have a good saying too, "Something around here doesn't smell right." Which means someone's not being honest and their story is Bullsh*t.

Sorta cuts right to the chase doesn't it??


Trump never takes a risk with anything. He didn't need Podesta's emails. He didn't collude with Putin. If he did, FBI would have found out.


edit on 13-1-2017 by JeremySun because: (no reason given)


+7 more 
posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:40 PM
link   
a reply to: mOjOm



You may want to try and hide some of that agenda bias there buddy. You're really giving yourself away here.


You are an expert on agenda bias.

Maybe clean up your own house before giving someone else 'advice'.



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:41 PM
link   
a reply to: JeremySun

What possible collusion / conspiracy could Putin & Trump have engineered to covertly coerce 60+ million yanks and the EC to vote for Trump and exceed the 270 count respectively?

a) Was her loss due to Wikileaks, Breitbart, Podestra emails, Project Veritas, Russian hackers, Putin et al?
OR
b) Was her loss due to her being a dodgy liar who labelled half the country as deplorable and refused to do a press conference?

I'm going with 5% for 'a' and 95% for 'b'



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Metallicus

You kinda have to be around here don't ya think.

Everyone has a bias.

But not everyone, especially new members, make that many threads pushing the same exact message completely based on their opinions without doing it for a reason.

Making false statements such as:



Liberals and independents don't watch Fox News or Trump's rallies. Only Trump's own supports ever seen the Podesta emails. The Podesta emails had no effect on the election because liberals and independents didn't see Podesta's emails.


Is another big clue as well.

You should know the signs by now too. Rather than go after me I would have thought you'd strive for more honesty around here and notice these things yourself. Guess I have to do all on my own.



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:49 PM
link   
Personally, I think the whole Russian thing is backwards.

I say Trump has the goods on Putin.

Lots of recent actions point to this idea.




posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:49 PM
link   
If Trump colluded with Putin in the election, US intelligence would have certainly found out. Not only would he not be POTUS, his family would also go bankrupt. It is not something Trump would have risked.



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: JeremySun

Trump never takes a risk with anything. He didn't need Podesta's emails. He didn't collude with Putin. If he did, FBI would have found out.



Really???

Tell that to everyone in Atlantic City who lost their money when he used to to buy too many casinos that all went bankrupt. Ask them if Trump ever takes a risk.



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: JeremySun

What possible collusion / conspiracy could Putin & Trump have engineered to covertly coerce 60+ million yanks and the EC to vote for Trump and exceed the 270 count respectively?

a) Was her loss due to Wikileaks, Breitbart, Podestra emails, Project Veritas, Russian hackers, Putin et al?
OR
b) Was her loss due to her being a dodgy liar who labelled half the country as deplorable and refused to do a press conference?

I'm going with 5% for 'a' and 95% for 'b'



The same kind of collusion implanted in the minds of our youth in this country to pay an exorbitant price for an education to learn nothing worthy of getting gainful employment upon getting their diploma but an entitlement attitude to demand they shouldn't have to pay back their loans because they were suckered into learning nothing more than hating their own freedom and liberty by a bunch of cultural Marxist college professors who would make Hitler proud! *hell even I had to take a breath after that one*

Now that's entitlement! Yet, we wonder where we went wrong?
edit on 13-1-2017 by seeker1963 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: JeremySun

What possible collusion / conspiracy could Putin & Trump have engineered to covertly coerce 60+ million yanks and the EC to vote for Trump and exceed the 270 count respectively?

a) Was her loss due to Wikileaks, Breitbart, Podestra emails, Project Veritas, Russian hackers, Putin et al?
OR
b) Was her loss due to her being a dodgy liar who labelled half the country as deplorable and refused to do a press conference?

I'm going with 5% for 'a' and 95% for 'b'



For me it was b..

All she had to do was be like 35% more human and trump would have been steamrolled.

This has nothing to do with the Russians unless Hillary is a Russian asset.



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:53 PM
link   
a reply to: mOjOm

That is in the business world. US intelligence don't care what he does in the business world.



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:53 PM
link   



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:55 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

gawd I love how far the media reached to appear like an authority figure..

Like we got this little humans you are not allowed to see what daddy does..
(the media is part of government? Is that what they were saying?))

omg I never thought this day would come so soon..

AND they are outing themselves..

Like whaaa?


edit on 13-1-2017 by Reverbs because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:57 PM
link   
a reply to: JeremySun

You said he doesn't take risks which is wrong. He takes them all the time. That's what he does. He doesn't always win however so now he just takes them without risking himself personally.

You really think that's going to change??? No. It won't.

He'll risk the people of this country rather than himself though at the drop of a hat.



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: JeremySun

You may have a good point.

CNN said this:

WATCH: CNN Claims It’s Illegal for Anyone But the Media to Read Clinton WikiLeaks Emails







CNN never read any Podesta email. Neither did MSNBC. Ergo, only Trump supporters seen Podesta emails and therefore Podesta emails had no effect because no one else seen them.



posted on Jan, 13 2017 @ 08:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: JeremySun


CNN never read any Podesta email. Neither did MSNBC. Ergo, only Trump supporters seen Podesta emails and therefore Podesta emails had no effect because no one else seen them.


well you have data on that?

I don't know many outside of ATS that know about any of this so you could be right, but my sample size is too small and unscientific, so I'm not calling those numbers.



new topics

top topics



 
14
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join