It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: xuenchen
I don't see the problem with excessive force when you're the guy with a target on your back in a city full of thugs that would rather kill you than be respectful of your law and order.
Exactly. Why go after those in Law Enforcement. Go after those who create the laws and sentence you to the criminal factory we call our prison system.
The reason the bad LEO's get a light sentence or no sentence at all is because of the judges and politicians who depend on being protected by them!
What a freakin mess!
You go after law enforcement because they are unequivocally part of the problem in Chicago with a long history of violence and corruption. I would say the police, mayors office, and schools are the biggest problems in Chicago.
You are fooling yourself and lack a historical context if you think Chicago police are not an issue. How do you think the gangs and drugs stay on the streets? Bribes.
Whole departments have been questioned. Hell a high level officer had a massive jewel theft operation not long ago.
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: xuenchen
I don't see the problem with excessive force when you're the guy with a target on your back in a city full of thugs that would rather kill you than be respectful of your law and order.
Exactly. Why go after those in Law Enforcement. Go after those who create the laws and sentence you to the criminal factory we call our prison system.
The reason the bad LEO's get a light sentence or no sentence at all is because of the judges and politicians who depend on being protected by them!
What a freakin mess!
You go after law enforcement because they are unequivocally part of the problem in Chicago with a long history of violence and corruption. I would say the police, mayors office, and schools are the biggest problems in Chicago.
You are fooling yourself and lack a historical context if you think Chicago police are not an issue. How do you think the gangs and drugs stay on the streets? Bribes.
Whole departments have been questioned. Hell a high level officer had a massive jewel theft operation not long ago.
No wonder we can't cure cancer! Treat the symptom instead of the actual disease?
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: LSU0408
LA and NY are nothing like Chicago or detroit.
It goes way beyond partisan politics.
Both parties have plenty of history of corruption. But go ahead and keep drinking the Kool aid, it's always the other guys fault right?
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: LSU0408
I am sure he is. As was GWB admin, Clinton, Reagan, Nixon.
Or did those guys solve the problems?
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: xuenchen
I don't see the problem with excessive force when you're the guy with a target on your back in a city full of thugs that would rather kill you than be respectful of your law and order.
That is easy to say unless you are walking down a street in Chicago just minding your own business and you reach into your jacket for your phone as a police officer drives by and they open fire thinking you are pulling a gun since they have that target on their backs, as you mention..
I haven't heard of a scenario like that yet.
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: LSU0408
I am sure he is. As was GWB admin, Clinton, Reagan, Nixon.
Or did those guys solve the problems?
There you go again, I'm not trying to spark a political argument. Of all the presidents we've had, Obama is the one who could have reached out to those impoverished minority communities and had a better chance of fixing them than any of the white people we've elected. Wouldn't you agree with that?
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: xuenchen
I don't see the problem with excessive force when you're the guy with a target on your back in a city full of thugs that would rather kill you than be respectful of your law and order.
That is easy to say unless you are walking down a street in Chicago just minding your own business and you reach into your jacket for your phone as a police officer drives by and they open fire thinking you are pulling a gun since they have that target on their backs, as you mention..
I haven't heard of a scenario like that yet.
But when people are advocating and even encouraging police to use excessive force, the potential for that scenario to happen is much greater. That can't be good.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: LSU0408
LA and NY are nothing like Chicago or detroit.
It goes way beyond partisan politics.
Both parties have plenty of history of corruption. But go ahead and keep drinking the Kool aid, it's always the other guys fault right?
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: LSU0408
And police forces.
It goes way beyond that though.
The money is shared.
It takes an awful lot of bribing and turning backs to get the amount of drugs on the streets we have.
Reagan for instance did nothing to stop drugs but he did increase the value. Making the drug dealers more money. Drug dealers pay off police, dea, fbi, etc..
Police are just a much the problem as the citizens in Chicago.
And no they don't get a pass because their job is hard. They have terrible unions like teachers who allow all the bad apples to sTay on the force. I teach wrestling with a Leo who can't stand 30 percent of the slobs on the force. He literally said he would do everything in his power to avoid working with some.
Cops are not the only problem and they are more a symptom at the patrol level, but they need better standards and far better training in possibly a majority of the countries cities also better pay to avoid the desperate bribe taking by guys who may be decent but just can't survive off the salary.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: LSU0408
LA and NY are nothing like Chicago or detroit.
It goes way beyond partisan politics.
Both parties have plenty of history of corruption. But go ahead and keep drinking the Kool aid, it's always the other guys fault right?
That's hilarious, coming from the same member that just blamed law enforcement for the prevalence of thug culture.
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: LSU0408
I am sure he is. As was GWB admin, Clinton, Reagan, Nixon.
Or did those guys solve the problems?
There you go again, I'm not trying to spark a political argument. Of all the presidents we've had, Obama is the one who could have reached out to those impoverished minority communities and had a better chance of fixing them than any of the white people we've elected. Wouldn't you agree with that?
I would definitely agree and it is the thing most disappointing about him
But maybe it's over the president's head since it never gets fixed.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: LSU0408
Chicago has been violent since prohibition. Including the civil right Era, Democrat convention etc.
Seriously read some history. It's certainly worsened by lbj's war on poverty but it goes way beyond Democrat republican blaming.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: luthier
I never said word one about CPD not being corrupt. Far from it in fact, since I used to live just outside the city and am well familiar with it. No need to make stuff up and then ask me to defend the ridiculous premise that you came up with.
But let's not talk about "drinking the kool-aid and blaming the other guy" in one comment and then turn around and blame the other guy in the next comment. CPD has a lot of corruption in it, but I'm more than happy to wager that the corruption doesn't rise to the level of forcing gangs to go out and kill each other, or forcing wannabe hoodrats to go out and kill their neighbors, or forcing thugs to go do a drive-by and pop 8 year old little girls.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: luthier
I never said word one about CPD not being corrupt. Far from it in fact, since I used to live just outside the city and am well familiar with it. No need to make stuff up and then ask me to defend the ridiculous premise that you came up with.
But let's not talk about "drinking the kool-aid and blaming the other guy" in one comment and then turn around and blame the other guy in the next comment. CPD has a lot of corruption in it, but I'm more than happy to wager that the corruption doesn't rise to the level of forcing gangs to go out and kill each other, or forcing wannabe hoodrats to go out and kill their neighbors, or forcing thugs to go do a drive-by and pop 8 year old little girls.
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: luthier
I never said word one about CPD not being corrupt. Far from it in fact, since I used to live just outside the city and am well familiar with it. No need to make stuff up and then ask me to defend the ridiculous premise that you came up with.
But let's not talk about "drinking the kool-aid and blaming the other guy" in one comment and then turn around and blame the other guy in the next comment. CPD has a lot of corruption in it, but I'm more than happy to wager that the corruption doesn't rise to the level of forcing gangs to go out and kill each other, or forcing wannabe hoodrats to go out and kill their neighbors, or forcing thugs to go do a drive-by and pop 8 year old little girls.
Fair enough.
They however allow it to happen and profit off of it. Which is a major civil right violation for the people not gang banging who have to live in it.
Also never said it was their fault exclusively so your entire argument may as well be reversed to yourself.