It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
False. nearly everything you've said is this more or less wrong or backwards.
originally posted by: Gothmog
From the start , the existence of black holes was taken as gospel. Einstein was one of the first to theorize they exist. However , of late there has been a growing scientific idea that they do not . And Can not exist.
Black holes were once theoretical, suggested by the mathematical equations of physics and Einstein's relativity, which predicted what would happen if too much mass collected in one spot. There was debate about whether black holes really existed; Einstein himself thought they were "too strange to be real."
"When I was a PhD student, people used to giggle when you hear[d] about black holes. They're like unicorns, mythical creatures. We call this the 'giggle factor.' People would say, 'Beam me up, Scotty.' Well, no one is laughing anymore."
~ Dr. Michio Kaku, Theoretical Physicist, on How the Universe Works.
The first known black hole was Cygnus X-1, discovered in 1964 as a powerful, mysterious source of x-rays. Since then, thousands of black holes have been discovered through the energy emissions of their dying prey or their tugs on nearby stars, dust, gas, and even galaxies.
False. You fell for the link-bait propaganda. She has done some interesting work but it doesn't prove black don't holes exist as the ignorant headlines claim.
Research Laura Mersini-Houghton who "proved" black holes do not exist.
This is interesting theoretical work, and it raises questions about the formation of stellar-mass black holes. But it doesn’t prove that stellar-mass black holes don’t exist, nor does it say anything about intermediate mass or supermassive black holes, which would form by processes other than stellar collapse. And of course the work depends upon Hawking’s take on firewalls to be correct, which hasn’t been proven. To say that this work proves black holes don’t exist is disingenuous at best.
So don’t buy into the hype. Black holes are real, this work is interesting, and the link-baiters should be ashamed of themselves.
Yes, that's compelling evidence for a supermassive black hole at the center of our galaxy.
originally posted by: intrptr
Ummm, have you seen this? If you have, you wouldn't say that.
originally posted by: Gothmog
From the start , the existence of black holes was taken as gospel. Einstein was one of the first to theorize they exist. However , of late there has been a growing scientific idea that they do not . And Can not exist. Research Laura Mersini-Houghton who "proved" black holes do not exist. Not saying either way it proven physics , but I keep an open mind about everything.
originally posted by: pheonix358
Perhaps science needs to first understand the very basics and AFTER they have solved the very basics, they can move on to more difficult subjects.
Science does not know what gravity is.
So anything after that is just speculation
originally posted by: pheonix358
Perhaps science needs to first understand the very basics and AFTER they have solved the very basics, they can move on to more difficult subjects.
Science does not know what gravity is.
originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: DupontDeux
Evidently you didnt research the person I mentioned. And of course , there is Hawking himself stating black holes may not exist. Else , you would know why they stated this and why we "see" black holes
To be clear, Hawking was not claiming that black holes don’t exist. Astronomers have been observing black holes for decades, said Joseph Polchinski, theoretical physicist at the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara.
What Hawking did was propose an explanation to one of the most puzzling problems in theoretical physics. How can black holes exist when they seem to break two fundamental laws of physics — Einstein’s laws of relativity and quantum mechanics?
Source
originally posted by: Gothmog
From the start , the existence of black holes was taken as gospel. Einstein was one of the first to theorize they exist. However , of late there has been a growing scientific idea that they do not . And Can not exist. Research Laura Mersini-Houghton who "proved" black holes do not exist. Not saying either way it proven physics , but I keep an open mind about everything.
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
originally posted by: Gothmog
From the start , the existence of black holes was taken as gospel. Einstein was one of the first to theorize they exist. However , of late there has been a growing scientific idea that they do not . And Can not exist. Research Laura Mersini-Houghton who "proved" black holes do not exist. Not saying either way it proven physics , but I keep an open mind about everything.
So far, every single one of Einsteins predictions have turned out to be correct. The maths work with regards to black holes and they have been observed indirectly. I think it's a safe bet that they do exist.
If they fail to find dark matter then a new theory of gravity needs be formulated, like MOND.
I wasn't aware that the theories of relativity (special or general) predict the expansion of the Universe. Can you elucidate?
Not to mention that the universe is expanding 10% faster than theory of relativity pedicts.
It would really mean that they couldn't figure out how to find dark matter.
I wasn't aware that the theories of relativity (special or general) predict the expansion of the Universe. Can you elucidate?