It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump refuses CNN reporters question and calls them fake news Priceless

page: 28
160
<< 25  26  27    29  30  31 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: synthetichuman
Yeah that was awesome. This is going to be an entertaining 8 years.


He only needs 4 years, Americans are going to be so tired of winning he won't need or want another term.





posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Konduit
Trump has officially co-opted the term "fake news" from the liberal media.

Are we tired of winning yet folks?


You haven't won this one. You are just using the word Fake News for ANYTHING that might insult your God Emperor.

Fake News should be relegated to things I noted in another thread.

1) superstation95
2)Secureteam10
3)Queen Elizabeth is a reptilian.
4) Hillary wore a colostomy bag under her pantsuit.
5) Trump is screwing Ivanka.
6) Niburu is about to show itself!
7) Obama will take your guns.
8) Michelle is a man.
9) The recent celebrity deaths are illuminati sacrifices.

There is more...but that is a general idea.

Fake news is NOT reporting on an intelligence briefing.


The left gave birth to the 'Fake News' moniker and tried to use it to shut up opposition. The left have failed. It is going to be used against the fake liberal media again and again and it's going to stick. You know why? Because it is the fake liberal media that so consistently lie to the American people.

Sorry, you don't get to decide what is to be classified as fake news.



Many left wing sites were on their fake news list so your attempt to smear the left is wrong and inaccurate
The Washington Post and the mysterious group calling itself PropOrNot,( the ones who started the Fake news moniker) are NOT any left group.
www.propornot.com...

In fact, Glen Greenwald exposed them here and he is of the left. theintercept.com...



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler
I do think that if Russia and Trump colluded together to win the election, that is a big deal, and I am open to information that would prove that.


It may be a big deal, but I'm not anti-Russian like so many are. I think the USA and Russia have much more in common, like combating the globalist agenda, than we have disagreements i.e. who has more power in the middle east. If Russia helped Trump defeat Hillary and the globalists, I am grateful to them. Now, I agree, I would like to know the details, but I wouldn't be totally against it. The globalists collude throughout the globe to consolidate their power, maybe it's time we fight fire with fire?



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:41 PM
link   
a reply to: FelisOrion

Interesting. TY.
What is your assessment of Hillary Clinton's character?



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

From everything I have researched, I still do not think Russia was the source of the leak.

I don't doubt they hacked. Russia hacks everyone.
So does China.
Every day I ban IP's on our email system from China, and also often from Russia, Taiwan, Brazil, South Africa and a few other common culprits.
They try brute force login attacks and all kinds of other tactics.
Add this to the phishing attempts (as Podesta fell for), and the attempts are non-stop.
If you have email on the public Internet, someone is trying to hack it 24/7. The DNC would be a high profile target so I'm sure it is worse for them.

I am 100% certain that if their system was set up so that Russia was able to hack them - then Russia was not the only one to hack them. If Russia got in, then others surely did.

Just because their logs show that Russia hacked does not mean that they gave information to WL.
I have not seen proof provided of this.
Until there is evidence otherwise, I still believe that the DNC leaks were from inside.
It may have been a DNC Bernie supporter or some other person who knew enough of Hillary to not want her as president (Seth Rich?). It could even have been a person on the staff of their email service provider.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

Actually I have corrected my post and admitted my error both here and on the other thread. Has anyone on the hard left done that about, well, anything?



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: reldra

That is the same link I gave an hour or more ago. There is no buzzfeed link in it.

That 'since has been published by buzzfeed' links back to the CNNMoney article with kellyann video. As I keep saying.


CNN edited and scrubbed.

Frikkin' shameful!!



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: xuenchen

No, no, no, you're doing it wrong. The correct response is - "Prove they didn't".



I always forget that part.




posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: ausername

originally posted by: synthetichuman
Yeah that was awesome. This is going to be an entertaining 8 years.


He only needs 4 years, Americans are going to be so tired of winning he won't need or want another term.



Straight up...having been around here for a while...

It's going to be pain...and most so for the people that voted for him..followed by silence here on ATS by the cheerleaders of this # Show.

It's just the way it works..Nose to spite the face and all that..they would rather "feel good" for a moment than succeed.

Everybody should mark economic indicators on inauguration day..so we can revisit the topic in 12 months.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: ausername

originally posted by: synthetichuman
Yeah that was awesome. This is going to be an entertaining 8 years.


He only needs 4 years, Americans are going to be so tired of winning he won't need or want another term.



Straight up...having been around here for a while...

It's going to be pain...and most so for the people that voted for him..followed by silence here on ATS by the cheerleaders of this # Show.

It's just the way it works..Nose to spite the face and all that..they would rather "feel good" for a moment than succeed.

Everybody should mark economic indicators on inauguration day..so we can revisit the topic in 12 months.


Ok say lets look at the economy twelve months into Obamas term. Oh wait I forgot all of those bad economic numbers were from Bush.

So for Obama, all economic numbers early that were negative were because of Bush, but for Trump if their are negative economic numbers it because of him not Obama.

Just trying to keep up here.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

Don't forget the Macedonian teens.




posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:51 PM
link   
a reply to: kosmicjack

You may have been correct. Kellyanne is going at it with Anderson Cooper and she says CNN was first and did link Buzzfeed. It's a good clip. good back and forth
www.cnn.com...



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: Indigo5

Actually I have corrected my post and admitted my error both here and on the other thread. Has anyone on the hard left done that about, well, anything?


If the other 99% of your propagandists compadres did the same there might be a discussion to be had.

Find an Op or Post where I refused reality...there is a search feature you are familiar with..Have at it.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:53 PM
link   
a reply to: EchoesInTime

Later, post interview, they called her a professional propagandist and and the source of many of their own "unnamed source" references. Ouch. Not anymore...



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: ausername

originally posted by: synthetichuman
Yeah that was awesome. This is going to be an entertaining 8 years.


He only needs 4 years, Americans are going to be so tired of winning he won't need or want another term.



Straight up...having been around here for a while...

It's going to be pain...and most so for the people that voted for him..followed by silence here on ATS by the cheerleaders of this # Show.

It's just the way it works..Nose to spite the face and all that..they would rather "feel good" for a moment than succeed.

Everybody should mark economic indicators on inauguration day..so we can revisit the topic in 12 months.


Ok say lets look at the economy twelve months into Obamas term. Oh wait I forgot all of those bad economic numbers were from Bush.



Ya..Go for that...Obama's fault for Trump's pending failure..How long you guys plan that defense? 4 years?



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5
your propagandists compadres


LMAO!

edit on 1/11/2017 by kosmicjack because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: ausername

originally posted by: synthetichuman
Yeah that was awesome. This is going to be an entertaining 8 years.


He only needs 4 years, Americans are going to be so tired of winning he won't need or want another term.



Straight up...having been around here for a while...

It's going to be pain...and most so for the people that voted for him..followed by silence here on ATS by the cheerleaders of this # Show.

It's just the way it works..Nose to spite the face and all that..they would rather "feel good" for a moment than succeed.

Everybody should mark economic indicators on inauguration day..so we can revisit the topic in 12 months.


So for Obama, all economic numbers early that were negative were because of Bush, but for Trump if their are negative economic numbers it because of him not Obama.

Just trying to keep up here.


TREND...

Trump is going to "Magnificently" "Hugely" "So much!!" improve these numbers...right???

Not REVERSE THEM?...Cuz that is what I see happening short and long term under Trump Policies...




posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 10:00 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

She is a dangerous woman. Anything else?



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 10:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: FelisOrion
a reply to: IAMTAT

She is a dangerous woman. Anything else?

Dangerous, how/why?



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 10:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: EchoesInTime
a reply to: kosmicjack

You may have been correct. Kellyanne is going at it with Anderson Cooper and she says CNN was first and did link Buzzfeed. It's a good clip. good back and forth
www.cnn.com...


Here is part of it.





top topics



 
160
<< 25  26  27    29  30  31 >>

log in

join