It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump refuses CNN reporters question and calls them fake news Priceless

page: 26
159
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: SoulSurfer

Straight Up...That's FAKE NEWS...

This has been going on for several months before a 4Chan poster decided to BS..

The Dossier discussed here in October:
www.motherjones.com...

Same former agent was outed today..
WSJ Identifies Author of Trump Dossier As Ex–British Agent Christopher Steele
nymag.com...

All the puzzle pieces fit.

What you posted was BS.




Lol, your story is fake, silly!
At this point you are the last one left in a burning building. There are no more firemen coming for you, you'll have to fight your own way out


"All the puzzle pieces fit".. LOL . Comedy gold.
edit on 11/1/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: BlueAjah

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Kellyanne Conway provides CNN article linking (embedded) to Buzzfeed:
twitter.com...


Yes!!
That is what the original breaking news article on CNN included when it was in an earlier draft of the article.


The link links back to the 1st Cnn Money article.

106 Flags later.....CNN still did not link to Buzzfeed nor mention the odd details.

Only mentioned the buzzFeed report, like 50 other news outlets.


The article was first posted as breaking news YESTERDAY EVENING.
The ORIGINAL VERSION linked to the Buzzfeed article and the dossier.

As of right now the edit time and date on the article is "Updated 8:23 PM ET, Wed January 11, 2017"
The article was edited several times already last night, as I was checking in on it occasionally and has been edited today.

What you are seeing NOW is NOT what was there yesterday.

I'm not sure how else to explain so that you will understand.



If you pay ANY attention to online news, they will have an update for a typo, for an addition or just because the day changed. They have control over that. If they wanted to hide an edit, it is THEIR website lol.

You will find news stories from 12 days ago with an edit date of today.
edit on 11-1-2017 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
How are those Lawsuits against CNN going? Donald Trump will finish off the network after he's in office. I hope the CNN idiots are getting their resumes ready. Maybe Donna Brazil will hire them on the DNC's janitorial team.

I guess you and dimwit Donnie needs to learn about something called freedom of the press.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Konduit


Jes..Jeepers, he looks like Ian Paisley in that caricature. So be it! Er um, where is the fried Fox?
edit on 11-1-2017 by smurfy because: Text.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:44 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

Im not stating that they are legit. I am stating that they are claiming responsibility. Do you even know what 4chan is? It is a nest filled with hackers and immoral behavior. It is the least credible source, but they do make headlines for pulling stunts like these and hacking in groups of thousands of people.

They may not be "credible" but when they do things, people have reason to fear what they can do. It is a hive, perhaps the ultimate hive mind. And they do know how to make noise. Their reputation alone is proof of that.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: Grambler

And FYI - From a month ago...God help me you guys treat this like some leaked revelation when everyone knew..



A former high-ranking CIA official, who asked not to be identified, says in an email:


It is nearly certain that [Russian intelligence] would have done some sort of surveillance on him. Could have been low-key physical surveillance (following etc) or deeper surveillance, such as video/audio of hotel room and monitoring of electronics (your [communications] while [in Moscow] is on their network).
...

These communications intercept units are designated for high-importance personages of political and diplomatic standing, such as Donald Trump.

These units would've employed the most advanced intelligence collection systems in the nation. Anything short of a highly encrypted communications suite using military-grade technology would be simple for Russian intelligence to exploit.

Donald Trump's mobile phone would be among the easiest to exploit. His mobile phone, Bluetooth, and laptops were most likely not shielded and could have been intercepted and exploited any number of ways.

This means virtually everything he said, everything he texted, everything he wrote, and every communication he had in the electronic spectrum would be in the possession of Russian intelligence then and now.

His guest rooms in Moscow could have had virtually undetectable voice and video communications intercept devices planted in such a way that nothing could be done by Trump in private and would defy detection. The Spetssvyaz would also employ Russian military intelligence subunits as well as Federal Security Service (FSB) surveillance units which could follow him anywhere that he goes with seemingly normal people and detect, document, and provide a record of anything and anyone he met.


www.motherjones.com...

YOU SAME PEOPLE...Spent the last month denying Russia hacked the DNC...You posted FAKE NEWS to support that denial..

AND NOW TRUMP himself has acknowledged it.

You guys are on to the next BS Denial.



So what that mother jones reported it months ago?

So they too reported unverified garbage. That makes it ok for CNN to do it, and then spend hours discussing the ramifications of it, when they know it to not be verified.

There were unverified reports Obama was a Muslim, should have CNN and Fox etc. spent hours discussing what if it was true?

Oh and of course Trump said Russia hacked.

After all, he is the most immoral man ever to hold office, so he couldn't help but lie.

Maybe you should go start a Trump is the anti christ thread.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: Grambler


And even if you hate Trump Reldra, would you not agree that if the intelligence community is going after our president elect it is arguably treason and a huge deal?


If he is in Putin's pocket...it is precisely the intelligence communities patriotic duty to go after traitors.

As much as people want to turn way and think it is just too much...There is a TONNAGE of evidence that Trump has been working in concert for Putin and strong likelihood given his disposition for objectifying women as meat, joking about banging his own daughter and groping strangers...that he has done things in foreign countries he would not want the public to know.

Clapper et al.. In outing this..have just greatly devalued Putin's "Kompromat" file..

What is left is chasing down the leads..and if Trump and Trumpites have nothing to hide...then that should be just fine with all Americans.

Sidenote: Never in history have we had such a narcissistic, unintelligent, immoral mess of a President Elect...total dumpster fire..2 to 4 years depending on impeachment.



Oh jeez. I spent so much time answering your last post, had I just read this one I would have known what I was dealing with.



Well I just stopped reading your last post half way through..if I had known your commitment to BS I wouldn't have read that far.

So we seem to be similar in that capacity...maybe we will let time and facts sort it out. What is your pain threshold for reality?...From the Born in Kenya party that Trump led for years...I suspect it is high.
edit on 11-1-2017 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: Grambler

And FYI - From a month ago...God help me you guys treat this like some leaked revelation when everyone knew..



A former high-ranking CIA official, who asked not to be identified, says in an email:


It is nearly certain that [Russian intelligence] would have done some sort of surveillance on him. Could have been low-key physical surveillance (following etc) or deeper surveillance, such as video/audio of hotel room and monitoring of electronics (your [communications] while [in Moscow] is on their network).
...

These communications intercept units are designated for high-importance personages of political and diplomatic standing, such as Donald Trump.

These units would've employed the most advanced intelligence collection systems in the nation. Anything short of a highly encrypted communications suite using military-grade technology would be simple for Russian intelligence to exploit.

Donald Trump's mobile phone would be among the easiest to exploit. His mobile phone, Bluetooth, and laptops were most likely not shielded and could have been intercepted and exploited any number of ways.

This means virtually everything he said, everything he texted, everything he wrote, and every communication he had in the electronic spectrum would be in the possession of Russian intelligence then and now.

His guest rooms in Moscow could have had virtually undetectable voice and video communications intercept devices planted in such a way that nothing could be done by Trump in private and would defy detection. The Spetssvyaz would also employ Russian military intelligence subunits as well as Federal Security Service (FSB) surveillance units which could follow him anywhere that he goes with seemingly normal people and detect, document, and provide a record of anything and anyone he met.


www.motherjones.com...

YOU SAME PEOPLE...Spent the last month denying Russia hacked the DNC...You posted FAKE NEWS to support that denial..

AND NOW TRUMP himself has acknowledged it.

You guys are on to the next BS Denial.




There were unverified reports Obama was a Muslim, should have CNN and Fox etc. spent hours discussing what if it was true?


WTF is wrong with you...THEY SPENT YEARS discussing it..



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
a reply to: reldra

Im not stating that they are legit. I am stating that they are claiming responsibility. Do you even know what 4chan is? It is a nest filled with hackers and immoral behavior. It is the least credible source, but they do make headlines for pulling stunts like these and hacking in groups of thousands of people.

They may not be "credible" but when they do things, people have reason to fear what they can do. It is a hive, perhaps the ultimate hive mind. And they do know how to make noise. Their reputation alone is proof of that.



Right now, 4chan is as credible as CNN.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
a reply to: reldra

Im not stating that they are legit. I am stating that they are claiming responsibility. Do you even know what 4chan is? It is a nest filled with hackers and immoral behavior. It is the least credible source, but they do make headlines for pulling stunts like these and hacking in groups of thousands of people.

They may not be "credible" but when they do things, people have reason to fear what they can do. It is a hive, perhaps the ultimate hive mind. And they do know how to make noise. Their reputation alone is proof of that.



I am fully aware of what 4chan is. I have been posting on it for years. Thus the jokes. Though I do know a couple of viral hoaxes have come out of there. I remember one that ended up on here...a military guy in an underground secret base thing..he was showing off keys to a gun locker.

It is mostly kids, now.
edit on 11-1-2017 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: Grambler

And FYI - From a month ago...God help me you guys treat this like some leaked revelation when everyone knew..



A former high-ranking CIA official, who asked not to be identified, says in an email:


It is nearly certain that [Russian intelligence] would have done some sort of surveillance on him. Could have been low-key physical surveillance (following etc) or deeper surveillance, such as video/audio of hotel room and monitoring of electronics (your [communications] while [in Moscow] is on their network).
...

These communications intercept units are designated for high-importance personages of political and diplomatic standing, such as Donald Trump.

These units would've employed the most advanced intelligence collection systems in the nation. Anything short of a highly encrypted communications suite using military-grade technology would be simple for Russian intelligence to exploit.

Donald Trump's mobile phone would be among the easiest to exploit. His mobile phone, Bluetooth, and laptops were most likely not shielded and could have been intercepted and exploited any number of ways.

This means virtually everything he said, everything he texted, everything he wrote, and every communication he had in the electronic spectrum would be in the possession of Russian intelligence then and now.

His guest rooms in Moscow could have had virtually undetectable voice and video communications intercept devices planted in such a way that nothing could be done by Trump in private and would defy detection. The Spetssvyaz would also employ Russian military intelligence subunits as well as Federal Security Service (FSB) surveillance units which could follow him anywhere that he goes with seemingly normal people and detect, document, and provide a record of anything and anyone he met.


www.motherjones.com...

YOU SAME PEOPLE...Spent the last month denying Russia hacked the DNC...You posted FAKE NEWS to support that denial..

AND NOW TRUMP himself has acknowledged it.

You guys are on to the next BS Denial.





Maybe you should go start a Trump is the anti christ thread.


I think he has done 3 of those already.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
a reply to: reldra

Im not stating that they are legit. I am stating that they are claiming responsibility. Do you even know what 4chan is? It is a nest filled with hackers and immoral behavior. It is the least credible source, but they do make headlines for pulling stunts like these and hacking in groups of thousands of people.

They may not be "credible" but when they do things, people have reason to fear what they can do. It is a hive, perhaps the ultimate hive mind. And they do know how to make noise. Their reputation alone is proof of that.



Right now, 4chan is as credible as CNN.


No.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Kellyanne Conway provides CNN article linking (embedded) to Buzzfeed:
twitter.com...


Yes!!
That is what the original breaking news article on CNN included when it was in an earlier draft of the article.



But it also doesn't link. Unless there is a way to find an archive and it supports the link claim, it's done.
edit on 1/11/2017 by kosmicjack because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: UKTruth

No sorry. Trump doesn't have a better read on intel than I do. I don't think that I know more about hacking than anyone, or more about ISIS that the generals, or any other extremely stupid things that Trump has said. Nor to I believe any of the lies that he's tossed out way.

You can't trust a single thing that comes out of Trump's mouth! He lies! Why would I trust him and Putin over my own country's intelligence agencies!

I would not!



Hahahahahahahaha Bookmarked!
You think you know more about the intelligence services than Trump does - the President Elect who is talking with them and being briefed by them, but you know better? Priceless.



Of course they know more!

Just like they know more about biz than a billionaire, more about policy and ethics than prez elect, more about running a country, more about any subject we can name.

Talk about backseat driving, Oy!

They also seem to know the future. Better psychoanalysis then Sigmond or Carl. More sociology than Hari Seldon.

I sit here in total awe of their awesomeness.

lol. They should have seen him coming.

Their kingmaker days are over.











posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: Grambler

And FYI - From a month ago...God help me you guys treat this like some leaked revelation when everyone knew..



A former high-ranking CIA official, who asked not to be identified, says in an email:


It is nearly certain that [Russian intelligence] would have done some sort of surveillance on him. Could have been low-key physical surveillance (following etc) or deeper surveillance, such as video/audio of hotel room and monitoring of electronics (your [communications] while [in Moscow] is on their network).
...

These communications intercept units are designated for high-importance personages of political and diplomatic standing, such as Donald Trump.

These units would've employed the most advanced intelligence collection systems in the nation. Anything short of a highly encrypted communications suite using military-grade technology would be simple for Russian intelligence to exploit.

Donald Trump's mobile phone would be among the easiest to exploit. His mobile phone, Bluetooth, and laptops were most likely not shielded and could have been intercepted and exploited any number of ways.

This means virtually everything he said, everything he texted, everything he wrote, and every communication he had in the electronic spectrum would be in the possession of Russian intelligence then and now.

His guest rooms in Moscow could have had virtually undetectable voice and video communications intercept devices planted in such a way that nothing could be done by Trump in private and would defy detection. The Spetssvyaz would also employ Russian military intelligence subunits as well as Federal Security Service (FSB) surveillance units which could follow him anywhere that he goes with seemingly normal people and detect, document, and provide a record of anything and anyone he met.


www.motherjones.com...

YOU SAME PEOPLE...Spent the last month denying Russia hacked the DNC...You posted FAKE NEWS to support that denial..

AND NOW TRUMP himself has acknowledged it.

You guys are on to the next BS Denial.




There were unverified reports Obama was a Muslim, should have CNN and Fox etc. spent hours discussing what if it was true?


WTF is wrong with you...THEY SPENT YEARS discussing it..


I am wondering if he was in a coma during those years? ME? Give him the benefit of the doubt, lol.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: SoulSurfer

Straight Up...That's FAKE NEWS...

This has been going on for several months before a 4Chan poster decided to BS..

The Dossier discussed here in October:
www.motherjones.com...

Same former agent was outed today..
WSJ Identifies Author of Trump Dossier As Ex–British Agent Christopher Steele
nymag.com...

All the puzzle pieces fit.

What you posted was BS.




Lol, your story is fake, silly!


Well...were in the mudpit and its my bedtime, so I will leave you with this...

Call it gut instinct...Take a good look...and tell me this is not a man that wants to be peed on...



Sleep tight with that image...



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Greggers

originally posted by: kosmicjack

originally posted by: Greggers


So, the contention is that Christopher steel wrote the bit about Trump holding a plate of chicken tenders? And the stuff on page 35 about hookers peeing on beds? That seems a little nuts.


LMAO! Right? The entire thing was so sophomoric. If he is real and he did write it, no one should ever hire him again.


Exactly! It's amazing, the entire thing. It is hard to believe the entire document is not an elaborate joke, because that is EXACTLY how it reads.

The hookers thing is funny and absurd, but it's really the chicken tenders thing that puts it over the top in my mind. Just so silly.

what page of the dossier was the chicken tenders thing on?



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: UKTruth

No sorry. Trump doesn't have a better read on intel than I do. I don't think that I know more about hacking than anyone, or more about ISIS that the generals, or any other extremely stupid things that Trump has said. Nor to I believe any of the lies that he's tossed out way.

You can't trust a single thing that comes out of Trump's mouth! He lies! Why would I trust him and Putin over my own country's intelligence agencies!

I would not!



Hahahahahahahaha Bookmarked!
You think you know more about the intelligence services than Trump does - the President Elect who is talking with them and being briefed by them, but you know better? Priceless.



Of course they know more!

Just like they know more about biz than a billionaire, more about policy and ethics than prez elect, more about running a country, more about any subject we can name.

Talk about backseat driving, Oy!

They also seem to know the future. Better psychoanalysis then Sigmond or Carl. More sociology than Hari Seldon.

I sit here in total awe of their awesomeness.

lol. They should have seen him coming.

Their kingmaker days are over.





Some of us do know more. I can't tell you who you who, or, you know...



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: BlueAjah

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: BlueAjah

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Kellyanne Conway provides CNN article linking (embedded) to Buzzfeed:
twitter.com...


Yes!!
That is what the original breaking news article on CNN included when it was in an earlier draft of the article.


The link links back to the 1st Cnn Money article.

106 Flags later.....CNN still did not link to Buzzfeed nor mention the odd details.

Only mentioned the buzzFeed report, like 50 other news outlets.


The article was first posted as breaking news YESTERDAY EVENING.
The ORIGINAL VERSION linked to the Buzzfeed article and the dossier.

As of right now the edit time and date on the article is "Updated 8:23 PM ET, Wed January 11, 2017"
The article was edited several times already last night, as I was checking in on it occasionally and has been edited today.

What you are seeing NOW is NOT what was there yesterday.

I'm not sure how else to explain so that you will understand.



If you pay ANY attention to online news, they will have an update for a typo, for an addition or just because the day changed. They have control over that. If they wanted to hide an edit, it is THEIR website lol.

You will find news stories from 12 days ago with an edit date of today.


I referred to this CNN article multiple times last night because we were in a significant discussion in another thread.
The article changed substantially over the course of the night, and changed even more today.
This was not a few spelling errors.

I design web sites.
I know how easy it is to redirect a link or change a web page to make a hyperlink go to someplace different now than it went a few minutes ago.

I am sure that Conway did a copy/paste of the article last night, which is how she has the content.
I would have if I were her. I would have also screen shot the article and printed it for the record.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: Grambler

And FYI - From a month ago...God help me you guys treat this like some leaked revelation when everyone knew..



A former high-ranking CIA official, who asked not to be identified, says in an email:


It is nearly certain that [Russian intelligence] would have done some sort of surveillance on him. Could have been low-key physical surveillance (following etc) or deeper surveillance, such as video/audio of hotel room and monitoring of electronics (your [communications] while [in Moscow] is on their network).
...

These communications intercept units are designated for high-importance personages of political and diplomatic standing, such as Donald Trump.

These units would've employed the most advanced intelligence collection systems in the nation. Anything short of a highly encrypted communications suite using military-grade technology would be simple for Russian intelligence to exploit.

Donald Trump's mobile phone would be among the easiest to exploit. His mobile phone, Bluetooth, and laptops were most likely not shielded and could have been intercepted and exploited any number of ways.

This means virtually everything he said, everything he texted, everything he wrote, and every communication he had in the electronic spectrum would be in the possession of Russian intelligence then and now.

His guest rooms in Moscow could have had virtually undetectable voice and video communications intercept devices planted in such a way that nothing could be done by Trump in private and would defy detection. The Spetssvyaz would also employ Russian military intelligence subunits as well as Federal Security Service (FSB) surveillance units which could follow him anywhere that he goes with seemingly normal people and detect, document, and provide a record of anything and anyone he met.


www.motherjones.com...

YOU SAME PEOPLE...Spent the last month denying Russia hacked the DNC...You posted FAKE NEWS to support that denial..

AND NOW TRUMP himself has acknowledged it.

You guys are on to the next BS Denial.




There were unverified reports Obama was a Muslim, should have CNN and Fox etc. spent hours discussing what if it was true?


WTF is wrong with you...THEY SPENT YEARS discussing it..


Really? Can you post me a link of a CNN panel discussing how damaging it would be if Obama was a Muslim? Thanks in advance!



new topics

top topics



 
159
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join