It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: seeker1963
The same Intel that said Iraq had weapons of mass destruction that you and your kind went nuts over when the truth came out Bush was wrong or a liar?
Actually, it was the intel community who argued against weapons of mass destruction, and Valerie Plame paid the price. History shows that it was the Bush administration that lied to and misrepresented the intel to Congress and the American people, not the intelligence community.
George W. Bush’s CIA briefer admits Iraq WMD “intelligence” was a lie
originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: ROBOTNINJADRAGON
None of this makes sense, at all, please explain.
originally posted by: Djarums
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: jimmyx
Okay, so anyone with businesses need to fire sale them to do politics.
Anyone with money need not apply to politics.
Only career politicians can do politics (despite the fact they get rich in the process).
Did I miss anything here?
Nope. You pretty much word for word stated the position of CNN analyst Larry Noble, given immediately after the press conference. The panel went through various alternative methods Trump could have taken and Noble dismissed each one as "not being good enough" to the point where we are left believing that no one but a career politician should ever again aspire to the office of President.
On Wednesday’s “MSNBC Live,” NBC News Senior Investigative and Legal Correspondent Cynthia McFadden reported that a senior US intelligence official told them “the president-elect was not briefed on this so-called two-page addendum of these allegations against him, that it was part of the briefing materials available to the briefers, but it was not included because they believed it to be true. … It was included should they feel they needed to explain to Mr. Trump the difference between analyzed intelligence, and what they’re calling unvetted disinformation, that it was available for that purpose, and that it never came up.”
originally posted by: ROBOTNINJADRAGON
originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: ROBOTNINJADRAGON
None of this makes sense, at all, please explain.
If the point is to call a source 'anonymous' this IMPLIES that direct accusation would be rebutted with a lie if by chance correct.
If you're a boss at a job, and someone is caught stealing by another employee, and the thief asks you if it was "Sally" and it WAS, do you LIE, or do you tell him "the truth" and let him track down the nark? Obviously you lie, so a 'track record' of lying or truth is irrelevant.
So it doesn't make logical sense eliminate Russia.
The last paragraph wasn't attempting to be too technical, I'll try again.
Even if the 'location of the computer' is in Russia, it can be 'remote controlled' from anywhere in the world, doesn't this change the idea of 'intent' slightly, despite the physical address of the hack?
Even if the 'location of the computer' is in Russia, it can be 'remote controlled' from anywhere in the world, doesn't this change the idea of 'intent' slightly, despite the physical address of the hack?
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Jonjonj
When did I ever claimed that the Secret Service rebelled against Pres. GW Bush?
Valerie Plame was outed as a CIA agent, because she refused to back the "yellow cake" story.
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: fencesitter85
He was laughably awful. Utterly terrible from start to finish. Petulant and evasive.
Are none of you Trumplets at all suspicious about how utterly shady he is about his tax returns? If you think he has nothing to hide then why would he not share them?
Oh and it's funny how insistent you all were that Russia weren't hacking, and now even Donnie admits it.
The Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Sen.Jay Rockefeller, stated in press release of report's publication“It is my belief that the Bush Administration was fixated on Iraq, and used the 9/11 attacks by al Qa’ida as justification for overthrowing Saddam Hussein. To accomplish this, top Administration officials made repeated statements that falsely linked Iraq and al Qa’ida as a single threat and insinuated that Iraq played a role in 9/11. Sadly, the Bush Administration led the nation into war under false pretenses.
..............
“There is no question we all relied on flawed intelligence. But, there is a fundamental difference between relying on incorrect intelligence and deliberately painting a picture to the American people that you know is not fully accurate."
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: BigTrumpFan
Russia has been hacking American infrastructure for 8 years. What has Obama done about it? Nada.
originally posted by: ROBOTNINJADRAGON
...It's hard to believe the Left is really this moderate verses the radical Right...