It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neformore
a reply to: ALSGoes4th
Its not going to work though is it?
People are just going to cry "fake news" in rabid packs. Your reason and logic is just another smear to some people.
Imagine Watergate happening now. Think about it.
Nixon would still have been President, because Woodward and Bernstein would have been smeared as fake news outlets, and the President would be on Twitter decrying the Washington Post and the New York Times.
originally posted by: neformore
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
And yet they believed claims that Obama wasn't eligible to be President because he's black and his middle name is Hussein?
TextA former British intelligence officer now working for a private security-and-investigations firm produced the dossier of unverified allegations about President-elect Donald Trump’s activities and connections in Russia, people familiar with the matter say.
Christopher Steele, a director of London-based Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd., prepared the dossier, the people said. The document alleges that the Kremlin colluded with Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign and claims that Russian officials have compromising evidence of Mr. Trump’s behavior that could be used to blackmail him. Mr. Trump has dismissed the contents of the dossier as false and Russia has denied the claims.
Mr. Steele, 52 years old, is one of two directors of the firm, along with Christopher Burrows, 58.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
a reply to: loam
If it is fake, then somebody within the agency(ies) did it out of principle to their cause.
To me though, wikileaks coming out in defence of Russia and Trump is very telling.
~Tenth
Yea, no chance at all they are concerned with the TRUTH, must be some backroom dealing. Oh yea, Trump is bad, Mkay.
But of course you believe that all of the Pizzagate allegations are correct, even though some of those sprouted shoots from 4chan? Mkay.
How about you show me where my posts are regarding all that.
originally posted by: neformore
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
And yet they believed claims that Obama wasn't eligible to be President because he's black and his middle name is Hussein?
originally posted by: muse7
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: muse7
By revealing it was a troll, making msm look like witless mental defectives
Well...
Theres already talk of impeachment and investigations on Capitol Hill.
So looks like 4chan just trolled itself..
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
a reply to: loam
If it is fake, then somebody within the agency(ies) did it out of principle to their cause.
To me though, wikileaks coming out in defence of Russia and Trump is very telling.
~Tenth
Yea, no chance at all they are concerned with the TRUTH, must be some backroom dealing. Oh yea, Trump is bad, Mkay.
But of course you believe that all of the Pizzagate allegations are correct, even though some of those sprouted shoots from 4chan? Mkay.
How about you show me where my posts are regarding all that.
Actually I was speaking collectively to all the blowhards here on the site of 'awake' people who believed any old s##t that was directed at the Clinton campaign and her team but now go into meltdown when something not even remotely in the same ballpark and cry their tears.
Sorry if that offends, I know how thin skinned you may be when your idol is the one facing claims that can't be substantiated, but then, it seems even your soon to be secretary of state concedes Russia helped influence the foolish during the election.
You personally may not have showed anything about PG but then I can only send my response to one poster and if you are trying to say you didn't crack at people you called 'SJW's', if you didn't say any attempt to demonise Clinton was claimed by said SJW's to be a right wing conspiracy in a manner that suggested they were in denial of 'facts', then someone else is using your profile.
And yeah, I just looked at your posts. Your most recent thread says everything Russia leaked about the DNC is true and without any level of fabrication (you can't prove it wasn't edited BTW, it's very easy to do), but somehow the Republicans are still held at a higher level. Right. In your words... mkay.
originally posted by: neformore
a reply to: Grambler
Take off the bitter blinkers (your guy won!) and think about the actual question instead of trying to sideline it?
I'm not playing sides here.
Its a serious question affecting every bit of information you are exposed to, and right now you guys over there appear to be screwed.
originally posted by: muse7
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: muse7
By revealing it was a troll, making msm look like witless mental defectives
Well...
Theres already talk of impeachment and investigations on Capitol Hill.
So looks like 4chan just trolled itself..