It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sen. Jeff Sessions being schooled by Sen. Feinstein

page: 3
11
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 09:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
Here it is ... the big answer about Clinton...

... he is going to recuse himself from any Clinton investigation...

So did they all, how big a broom is that to sweep all malfeasance under the table.

Now Mr. Attorney General, are you going to go with the program? Its already decided before they sat down here. But looks good to have a 'hearing'. Will they be fielding questions from the 'Press'? Oh never mind, how about a few questions from the peoples... just never you mind.

If you tried to stand and ask a question you'd be arrested, there is no open mic segment in this theater.
edit on 10-1-2017 by intrptr because: spelling, addition




posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 09:51 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Integrity. His actions during the campaign could present a conflict of interest.

TheRedneck



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 09:53 AM
link   
How many rape baby abortions are out there?

WTF?!

Need 500 mil to deal with so many?!!!

We gots more than money problems if that's the case.




posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 09:55 AM
link   
Feinstein jailed women for having abortions?!?

Did I hear that right?

TheRedneck



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 09:57 AM
link   
This is like listening to a popular kid group that was also elected student body government having an snack supplied talk, knowing that the teachers will be listening.

It's a dog and turd show, polished and PC.

I can't stop seeing the pre 1950s ideals in these Trump picks.

That is what scares me most.



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 09:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: intrptr

He's clearly talking about assisting as in making databases and information available. I think you're confused. This isn't Loretta Lynch. It's Jeff Sessions.

TheRedneck

I think you are confused. This is a play. As far as the limits of "assisting" by only "making databases", thats not what I see. Everyytome theres an 'incident' twenty federal agencies 'embedded' with the states law enforcement apparatus descend on the scene.

These aren't 'data'...

image search



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 09:59 AM
link   
I bet she forgets to ask if he will have her arrested.

For being stupid.

Free cakes for the LGBT!!

Failed again Diane.





posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 10:00 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

They are also not under Sessions' DOJ.

TheRedneck



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 10:01 AM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Hey if they couldn't approve Obamas Supreme Court nominee then I see no reason to appprove any of Trumps. Works both ways. It's about about time the republicans get what they dish out.



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 10:02 AM
link   
I so wished they allowed LIVE unscripted calls from us the public to ask these doucheknuckles.

This guy sessions looks like a puppet more than anyone else I've seen on the hill.



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 10:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Tranceopticalinclined
I so wished they allowed LIVE unscripted calls from us the public to ask these doucheknuckles.

This guy sessions looks like a puppet more than anyone else I've seen on the hill.



Your post suggests you don't have the capability of asking a proper question in that kind of environment.



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 10:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: Tranceopticalinclined
This is like listening to a popular kid group that was also elected student body government having an snack supplied talk, knowing that the teachers will be listening.

It's a dog and turd show, polished and PC.

I can't stop seeing the pre 1950s ideals in these Trump picks.

That is what scares me most.



Pretty cool, huh.

Have you done something wrong lately?

Like actually broke a law?

Don't worry, these are repubs, you won't be arrested for what you are thinking or for what people accuse you of.




posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 10:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: intrptr

They are also not under Sessions' DOJ.

TheRedneck


Yet.




posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 10:08 AM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Don't trust someone just because they have an "R" beside their name.

Don't mistrust someone just because they have a "D" beside their name.

Both parties have good and bad in them.

TheRedneck



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 10:09 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Well aren't you full of happiness and sunshine.

You must have a wonderful outlook of life and yourself to attack others online, feels big doesn't it?

I actually have worked at the House and follow much of these activities, I'm just upset with the way these people enter office and then remain the larger voice of manipulation.

But your post doesn't seem that you have the capacity or capability to comment properly on said questions in this kind of environment.
edit on 10-1-2017 by Tranceopticalinclined because: To add encrypted info in the spaces.



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 10:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: damwel
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Hey if they couldn't approve Obamas Supreme Court nominee then I see no reason to appprove any of Trumps. Works both ways. It's about about time the republicans get what they dish out.



Very mature Stewie.

Wanna play that out?

Reid invoked the nuke option.

No way you dems have enough votes for anything.

You're lucky they let you speak.

So what's up with the human trafficking?

Is that a problem under the administration for the last 8 yrs?




posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 10:11 AM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy

It's not me I'm worried about, it's the United States and Minorities.

I mean last thing we need is a guy who's already been in the senate, not doing much and we need more of that one sided action?


edit on 10-1-2017 by Tranceopticalinclined because: (no reason given)


Maybe it's the public, I mean, they'd rather attack people and " Win " an argument for their ego than they would like to discuss the matters at hand.

That's amazing.
edit on 10-1-2017 by Tranceopticalinclined because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 10:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: Tranceopticalinclined
a reply to: UKTruth

Well aren't you full of happiness and sunshine.

You must have a wonderful outlook of life and yourself to attack others online, feels big doesn't it?

I actually have worked at the House and follow much of these activities, I'm just upset with the way these people enter office and then remain the larger voice of manipulation.

But your post doesn't seem that you have the capacity or capability to comment properly on said questions in this kind of environment.


Very happy thanks.
Like I said, you don't seem to be able to be objective, so I am glad you are nowhere near such a committee with a microphone.
The questions are from both sides and are covering the main areas of concern.

edit on 10/1/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 10:13 AM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck

He's already approved, this is a confirmation for our benefit. He will do what he is told just like all the rest. And what a miserable record they have, too.

previous



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 10:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Don't trust someone just because they have an "R" beside their name.

Don't mistrust someone just because they have a "D" beside their name.

Both parties have good and bad in them.

TheRedneck



I let them hang themselves.

No matter what they are.

"why did you oppose OBAMA!!!???"




new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join