It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Just a question for all of you...call it a poll if you will

page: 3
6
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 01:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Zimnydran

Against one world government.

I am typically libertarian/conservative.




posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 01:30 PM
link   
Government is a necessary evil. The bigger it gets, the worse it is.
No political affiliation.



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 03:25 PM
link   
I recognize the need for a global government if the human race is to survive. But it matters how it comes about and who is in charge.

The people seeking to create the New World Order today have made it clear that they view humans as a resource to be exploited. Their objective appears to be to increase their own wealth and power, not to improve the Earth for the rest of humanity. I am convinced they are sociopaths, murderers, pedophiles, and probably Satanists. They don't seek a consensus or consent of the governed. Their attitude is more of the tone, "Join us or die." Like a cult or a gang, once you are in, you will not be allowed to leave peacefully. There is no low they won't stoop to in order to achieve their global domination. I believe they would rather see the world destroyed than out of their control.

I consider myself a Constitutionalist. I believe the US Constitution and Bill of Rights is an excellent framework for a government, if only it were followed.



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 03:50 PM
link   
a reply to: weirdguy

Although I agree with you...... I think first we must become space faring. Enough people need to see the world from a distance so that the idea of...... we are just a little blue dot actually means something



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 04:12 PM
link   
Pro:
In a "World Government" the elections would be taken more seriously.

When you have individual people more powerful than countries, politics gets skewed. The Rothchilds could buy America twice.

No 'one' would be bigger than the "World Government".

Con:
The negative aspects of bureaucracy would be complete and find permanent place in society. I can't even fathom what hating a World Government would feel like, and people that are even 'against government' would have no place or voice left at all.



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 04:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zimnydran
Please indulge me on this one folks, its just my curiosity getting the better of me.
If you dont mind keep replies simple so the issue doesnt get steered off course into a troll-a-thon.

Are you in favor of or against the idea of a one world government and how do you describe your political affiliation.

I am against a global government and I consider myself libertarian



I am against global government and I believe in gay marriage, unemployment, social security, Medicare, universal healthcare,
gun rights, property rights, water rights and big, pro consumer regulations on globalist corporations, especially banks and insurance.



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 05:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Zimnydran


One government means one culture, so I am against it, because in diversity their is as much strength as division.



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 05:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Zimnydran
When considering "other" planetary governments potentially existing one world governments become a requirement...

Otherwise the planet still suffering from development issues? of segregation remains in mass behind or outside of the normalcy related to interplanetary gov. like systems.
AS ABOVE SO IS BELOW?

Hence as a/the species continues to oppress itself its left alone or ignored in mass by other mature planetary gov. unless special interest see reasons for visitation responses to masses and not installed - developing Shadow systems...



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 05:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Zimnydran

I am against a global government and I'm politically, socially, and economically neutral in almost every way. I just like the conservative personality more.

I have authoritarian views that are blended with anarchist views. I like some liberal economics with a good meaty side of conservative economics.

Global government, until Jesus comes, is the worst idea. Power must belong to a specific culture for itself, if protecting quality of life is the end of a government.

If war is the end of a government, then globally centralized leadership will cause a true War of the Worlds.

So, dead on balls neutral, mortal global governance is naughty, unless there were a benign intelligent King always capable of appointing the next.

I think voting is nice, but people are so ignorant. I don't trust the decision making ability of people in general. As well, having other cultures decide for me? It's bad enough the U.S. allows other States to set precedents which interfere with the precedents of the States in which I choose to reside. Or, rather, that the Federal government thinks it overrides the States. If the People were sovereign, then we'd each be our own benign Kings.

I guess I should stop, you only wanted the Polaroid picture.

Edit to add:. I like Jeff Daniels' attitude in the Civil War movie "Gettysburg". That's a close match to my thinking. Sprinkle some John Adams in there...


edit on 1/10/2017 by TarzanBeta because: Always another thought.



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 07:12 PM
link   
a reply to: VinylTyrant
There's no mention of a one world government before the flood. The first was at Babel.

The causes of the flood were man's continually wicked imagination, all flesh had corrupted itself and the Earth was filled with violence. (Genesis 6)



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 08:13 PM
link   
Totally against a one world government.

Lets first find a system of government that actually works for the people, and can stand the test of time. Until then any global government will be a disaster. At least with multiple governments, there is a chance of escape to a better place. If we were traveling in space, then it would be more feasible. One could escape to another planet. Until then, no way.



posted on Jan, 10 2017 @ 09:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Zimnydran

Against. As long as people are running things, it's a bad idea. Too much power over too many.

Politically? Basically conservative, but not a member of any party at the moment. For personal freedom, and respect for others.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 02:01 AM
link   
There are some issues that require a global engagement to address. Pedoporn and the financial markets are having some wins through global collaboration. I favour the expression of global consensus that the UN brings to large scale issues. As for what happens on what issue when push comes to shove is a complex one,

My political affiliation is in making things better.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 02:09 AM
link   
A one government world is OK with me, so long as Donald Trump is in charge of it.

Otherwise... no.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 05:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: Zimnydran
Please indulge me on this one folks, its just my curiosity getting the better of me.
If you dont mind keep replies simple so the issue doesnt get steered off course into a troll-a-thon.

Are you in favor of or against the idea of a one world government and how do you describe your political affiliation.

I am against a global government and I consider myself libertarian




No.

Not in the foreseeable future could it even be considered.

I also think it's a crappy idea.




posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 08:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
A one government world is OK with me, so long as Donald Trump is in charge of it.

Otherwise... no.






Welcome to the new GOP lmao!!


The most hypocritical organization in history, you remember the party of pronciples lmao



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:24 AM
link   
a reply to: Josephus

Exactly, the first was Babel.
The tower was destroyed and men scattered across the world with different languages to prevent man from exalting himself above the most high.

Now, once again, we have a universal language in English, the European union building built as an unfinished tower of babylon, the collective space agencies and technology to destroy life on earth. We have the ability to do whatever we can imagine. Its the whole reason for a push for one world government. To deny God. To deny what was written. To make it happen again. Only this time it won't be water.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: kwakakev
There are some issues that require a global engagement to address. Pedoporn and the financial markets are having some wins through global collaboration. I favour the expression of global consensus that the UN brings to large scale issues. As for what happens on what issue when push comes to shove is a complex one,

My political affiliation is in making things better.


If local governments acquired the same abilities as the Federal Government, then those topics could be addressed at home instead of on foreign soil. Then we'd actually be sovereign and responsible.

But that would require honesty and integrity, those weird fuzzy things people forget about when they get some of that authority in them.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:29 AM
link   
a reply to: VinylTyrant

And so many shall have a brimstone pillow.



posted on Jan, 11 2017 @ 09:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
A one government world is OK with me, so long as Donald Trump is in charge of it.

Otherwise... no.


Oy. I wanted him in, but not that far in. He's capable of representing the U.S., but he is absolutely wrong for the world.

I don't know any mortal that is right for it. I could say, like John Adams, I wouldn't be against the King idea if I was the king, but then I must admit that it is arrogant of me to believe that my intelligence, love for people, and love of freedom couldn't be compromised by something completely unforeseen.

If I'm wise enough to know that I cannot guarantee to be a perfect king myself, then I can trust no mortal to be king.

And I could be wrong, but I need evidence to contradict what I've experienced in bold.

I belief government is good, but I tend to think rules are made for those who have neither common sense nor decency. Those with common sense and decency don't need to worry about not doing wrong, but rather to consider how to do well.

Unfortunately, many people who need the rules also don't believe rules apply to them.

Therefore, no trust in a mortal heart can be found.

Trump for the King of the Earth is a frightening idea.



new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join