It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: HarryJoy
a reply to: namelesss
I agree completely with that....Thank you for sharing that info....I interpret the all seeing eye to represent the eye that sees from every perspective.
originally posted by: HarryJoy
a reply to: namelesss
I know that what you said about all being known...is true ! I have always believed it but the way in which I have seen it has evolved. ..or maybe my perception of what I would refer to as God has evolved. I find the fact of all being known as a very comforting thought...I feel that it is so easy to be misunderstood by our peers. And even ourselves at times.
I find myself very much on this middle path that you have spoken of.....I find it to create many conundrums that divides me between bone and marrow. ..so to speak.
originally posted by: MaxTamesSiva
a reply to: namelesss
I appeciate it. I hope you didn't mind me still pestering you with questions, I still have trouble trying to wrap my head around the middle way.
Can we examine certainty in the context of probabilities or arbitrary approximations and evaluations? That'll be self-defeating in a sense.
How about generalizations or grand pronouncements concerning the nature of ultimate reality bereft of even the shortest explanations?
To contemplate the simplicity of something complex or to examine the complexity of something simple? Why complicate something simple in the first place and why simplify the complex?
Do we just naively accept age old grand pronouncements or witty generalizations or should we be critical about it or do we just ignore it?
To arbitrarily illustrate:
From the bliss of ignorance to awareness, from curiosity to learning and contemplation punctuated by stages of doubt to realization and the ultimately bliss of enlightenment. So, from bliss to bliss it comes full circle. How do we define certainty?
Are we better off not to examine certain aspects of uncertainty
Maybe I should just shut up and again try to figure it out by myself... This could be messy.
"To escape one's illusions is to plunge headlong into chaos!" -Iota
originally posted by: MaxTamesSiva
a reply to: namelesss
Is the road to enlightenment then an endless kinky and messy foreplay?
"To escape one's illusions is to plunge headlong into chaos!" -Iota
I love it! But who is Iota?
A cursory google search lead me to another thread here in ATS with your post quoting it, another lead me to able2know.org, to onlinephilosophyclub.com etc. which lead me to Baruch Spinoza- Charles Gidley Wheeler book Iota: God as Nature, Nature as God, the other links lead me to Bertrand Russell's Theory of Definite Descriptions (On Denoting) to The Notation in Isaac Newton's Principia Mathematica and commentaries about how Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's notation was eventually used up to the present day in differential and integral calculus. I have to stop when it lead me to Kurt Gödel's philosophical notebooks that indicate that he had read Peano's Formulaire des mathématiques.
Do you recommend reading The Upanishads? What else do you recommend? Much obliged.
Damn! It appears that I don't know!
I tried a little search of my own an...
That is truly odd as that is a cut and pasted quote from somewhere. But who was he? I always assumed he (was a 'he') was some Greek philosopher, but I am finding no online support for such a thing!
Hmmm...
Sometimes we find ourselves in the darndest of places while researching something completely different!
I think that I will continue to share delightfully True quote, and continue to attribute it to Iota, until someone informs me otherwise.
Or garrotes me...
Alan Watts - 'The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are' is a small beautifully packed book with some real food for thought, an interesting Perspective from an Enlightened philosopher.
Whatever you are ready to understand, at your present state of evolution, whatever you NEED TO KNOW, will appear before you, pay attention!
Life is exactly on a 'need to know' basis, we never know/experience anything that we do not 'need to know'!
It is the 'practicing' rather than the reading of practicing that seems most fruitful. Books are fun and mind expanding and food for thought/ego, but reading the map won't get you the treasure, we have to 'practice'.
And I think that we are getting a bit tangential to the topic, at this point. I'd be happy to chat more about this through our email system, if you like.
originally posted by: HarryJoy
a reply to: glend
Is it a ball and chain. ..or a vehicle? Can we really gain new perspectives. ..without the friction of opposing polarities?
And just to clarify....I didn't mean physical harm ...just the psychological harm/pain that arises from not being able to reconcile an issue.
originally posted by: MaxTamesSiva
a reply to: namelesss
Life is exactly on a 'need to know' basis, we never know/experience anything that we do not 'need to know'!
I beg to disagree. I think it requires something like an intellectual promiscuity, to know the other side, not in the biblical sense though. How can we understand the views that we don't like or don't agree with if we can't make the effort to at least try to understand it?
Or did I took it too literally?
"It is the 'practicing' rather than the reading of practicing that seems most fruitful. Books are fun and mind expanding and food for thought/ego, but reading the map won't get you the treasure, we have to 'practice'."
Yeah, I agree. What will be the worth of what we know if we can't apply it in practice?
And I think that we are getting a bit tangential to the topic, at this point. I'd be happy to chat more about this through our email system, if you like.
That will be a terrific way to get rid of me annoying you with more questions. I'll PM you my e-mail ad and all you have to do is to ignore it. Brilliant!
Seriously though, how do we go about it, I'm new at this? You PM me, I don't PM you...