It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mrthumpy
Interesting thread on Metabunk about this Dr looking specifically at the too many too soon claim
www.metabunk.org...
each infant would have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10,000 vaccines at any one time
originally posted by: tribal
a reply to: ignorant_ape
let me start by saying im not a chemist so i cannot tell you whether the amount of formaldehyde in a vaccine is dangerous or not. And by the way, me being anti vaxx and posting the blog in the OP doesnt mean i have to agree with everything the doc says, does it? So lets leave the broad brush painting to others.
I found this explanation of how formaldehyde works and WHY its classed by our own EPA as a carcinogen. Its not a short or easy read, but im sure youre smart enough to understand it, i did and im not that smart.
drholly.typepad.com...
originally posted by: TarzanBeta
a reply to: Agartha
You're right. The vaccines won't produce the same problems as the virus itself. They'll produce NEW ones.
originally posted by: Boadicea
Ahhhhh... thank you. Got it! I think. Do you know if that's why the dead or inactive viruses are used?
I figured someone who knew better than me had already considered this... I've just never seen it addressed and decided to finally ask about it instead of wondering!
originally posted by: Pardon?
Care to elaborate McCoy?
(Some citations would be useful too)
originally posted by: Pardon?
originally posted by: TarzanBeta
a reply to: Agartha
You're right. The vaccines won't produce the same problems as the virus itself. They'll produce NEW ones.
Care to elaborate McCoy?
(Some citations would be useful too)
originally posted by: Agartha
a reply to: TarzanBeta
Anecdotal evidence is unreliable because I could contradict yours immediately: my three children had all their vaccinations and they didn't even have a slight temperature, nevermind changing their behaviour. They also never get ill.
There are thousands of trials and studies done that prove vaccines are safe and they are the most tested drug ever created.
originally posted by: TarzanBeta
originally posted by: Pardon?
originally posted by: TarzanBeta
a reply to: Agartha
You're right. The vaccines won't produce the same problems as the virus itself. They'll produce NEW ones.
Care to elaborate McCoy?
(Some citations would be useful too)
Makes me wonder if you have kids who have been vaccinated.
originally posted by: GetHyped
originally posted by: TarzanBeta
originally posted by: Pardon?
originally posted by: TarzanBeta
a reply to: Agartha
You're right. The vaccines won't produce the same problems as the virus itself. They'll produce NEW ones.
Care to elaborate McCoy?
(Some citations would be useful too)
Makes me wonder if you have kids who have been vaccinated.
Pardon? is a paediatrician so I'm sure has seen his fair share of vaccinated children. Certainly more data points than yours of... what, 1? 2?
But in any case, please tell us more about how personal anecdotes trump scientific data.
originally posted by: tribal
a reply to: Agartha
they are NOT enough to get a sufficient immune reaction, hence the inclusion of adjuvants.
originally posted by: TarzanBeta
originally posted by: mrthumpy
Interesting thread on Metabunk about this Dr looking specifically at the too many too soon claim
www.metabunk.org...
each infant would have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10,000 vaccines at any one time
Let's load up a bunch of dead or dying foreign soldiers into a military base and just see what happens.
While the body is busy discovering all 10,000 variations of the enemy, the Foot clan jumps in, replaces the officer of each department, and makes off with all the televisions and chow while the Ninja Turtles are busy eating pizza and taking turns making snarky jokes about how all the enemies look weird.
Medicine is war in the body. It requires strategy and tactics to win. That theory is absurd.
Edit to add:. In the event it escapes anyone, I approach medicine the same way that Leonard McCoy approaches life.
originally posted by: tribal
anecdotal evidence is not the same as EMPIRICAL evidence. This man was providing EMPIRICAL evidence. You dont have to like it, but it is what it is. Please learn the difference for a more fruitful discussion.
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: Agartha
originally posted by: tribal
anecdotal evidence is not the same as EMPIRICAL evidence. This man was providing EMPIRICAL evidence. You dont have to like it, but it is what it is. Please learn the difference for a more fruitful discussion.
en.wikipedia.org...
hahaha TarzanB provided anedoctal, which is personal experience.
Empirical is what scientists use!! lol