It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Will Putin launch a nuclear missile our way if Trump gets hauled in for a 72-hour observation?

page: 5
5
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 11:59 AM
link   
Something to consider......




posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 11:59 AM
link   
a reply to: SaloonSal
moloch LMFAO!!!!



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 12:03 PM
link   
every prez so far has killed people. they murder and do not blink an eye. (drone bombings are murder.)

the fact they do not blink and eye proves they are sociopaths.

a sociopath has zero emotions or empathy for others. they kill, and to them, its like going to the movies or the gym. its the exact same thing in their brain.

why do you think the world is all messed up? because sociopaths run the world.

oberman himself is probably a sociopath. he does not care about anything except #ting out the agenda they tell him to shout. if he gets rich, he is happy. does he care if the lower classes are harmed, no, because he a sociopath lol.



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 12:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: dashen

Just take his #ing phone away.


Only if someone can take your effing internet away.



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 12:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: luke1212
a reply to: theworldisnotenough

lol, you dont know much about the past presidents do you? were you aware that we had atleast one president that faught in a few duels, even killed someone for talking crap about his wife? we had one who would fist fight at drop of a hat. Trumps tweets are way less psychotic than someone that actually attacks someone wouldnt you say?


Did those things predate the 25th Amendment and Sigmund Freud?



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 12:10 PM
link   
a reply to: theworldisnotenough

So some "camp" is advocating a Pence Presidency ?



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 12:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust

And who is Marilyn Strep?


Some actress broad who spoke on the Golden Globes. I'm not really into the soap operas.



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 12:15 PM
link   
What the heck was Meryll Streep mocking Trump at the golden globe for in the first place? Is she sick or something, her whole speach seemed to be scattered a bit as if she is on some kind of medicine that is effecting her thinking. A movie star is just a person who makes a living by getting others to believe in something that is not real. Has she got disconnected from the real world.

I can't deny that Trump had a TV show and also was acting and making people believe in something not real. He was practicing to be a politician I suppose. And some people say he has no experience in Politics.



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 12:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: DAVID64

I for one do not think that Putin would respond in that way. What would be in it for him or his country? Seriously? The fact that an entire group of political losers are searching for any means necessary to invalidate this election is laughable. I am sure he and the Polit Bureau are watching your antics. It is like watching monkeys flinging feces at each other.

Putin will do what is in the best interested of Putin....lesser so what is in the best interests of his country. If it will advance his ability to rebuild the former USSR from the ashes, he will do it.

Launching a preemptive nuclear strike on the United States is, very likely, not on that list.

IMO, it is foolish to think it would let alone ask it as a question.

But, keep flinging that poo folks, we are standing by watching your antics and laughing at you at every fling.



Whoa! There was a Russian politico, who, before the election, basically gave the United States voters a choice... an ultimatum, actually: elect Hillary, and get nucked; elect Trump and have peace. It's very reasonable to assume that this guy was a front man, a flying monkey, for Putin because Putin didn't want to take the heat on the world stage for such an "advisory..." threat, actually.

Then there was the sabre rattling about Russia's Satan 2 nuclear weapons, five of which can obliterate the entire East Coast of America.

This is the background, the context that raised the question that serves at the title of this thread.



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 12:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

Oh...
You think I don't know crazy when I see it?


Ummm. don't be letting the cat out of the bag. People do not need to know you are a little crazy.



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 12:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: theworldisnotenough

originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: DAVID64

I for one do not think that Putin would respond in that way. What would be in it for him or his country? Seriously? The fact that an entire group of political losers are searching for any means necessary to invalidate this election is laughable. I am sure he and the Polit Bureau are watching your antics. It is like watching monkeys flinging feces at each other.

Putin will do what is in the best interested of Putin....lesser so what is in the best interests of his country. If it will advance his ability to rebuild the former USSR from the ashes, he will do it.

Launching a preemptive nuclear strike on the United States is, very likely, not on that list.

IMO, it is foolish to think it would let alone ask it as a question.

But, keep flinging that poo folks, we are standing by watching your antics and laughing at you at every fling.



Whoa! There was a Russian politico, who, before the election, basically gave the United States voters a choice... an ultimatum, actually: elect Hillary, and get nucked; elect Trump and have peace. It's very reasonable to assume that this guy was a front man, a flying monkey, for Putin because Putin didn't want to take the heat on the world stage for such an "advisory..." threat, actually.

Then there was the sabre rattling about Russia's Satan 2 nuclear weapons, five of which can obliterate the entire East Coast of America.

This is the background, the context that raised the question that serves at the title of this thread.


Saber rattling is part and parcel of politics. The USA does it just as well. And, having a nuke is very very different than launching a nuke on a population. Russia's "threats" should be taken as political posturing. They are managed by countering them with movements of military hardware and "training exercises".

But keep the fear mongering and doom porning up....fling that poo as far and wide as you can.



edit on 1/9/2017 by Krakatoa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 12:24 PM
link   
Meryl Streep should not have used that platform for political purposes.

You snowflakes just won't quit whining. it's getting really tired. Go Baker Act yourselves.


m.youtube.com...
edit on 9-1-2017 by gernblan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 12:36 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen
Obviously that haven't thought that far ahead, LOL.



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 01:22 PM
link   
Venting butt-hurt and defending yourself is not psychosis or any other form of mental illness.
We see this all over the place on this website.



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 02:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

How old are you?



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 02:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krakatoa

originally posted by: theworldisnotenough

originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: DAVID64

I for one do not think that Putin would respond in that way. What would be in it for him or his country? Seriously? The fact that an entire group of political losers are searching for any means necessary to invalidate this election is laughable. I am sure he and the Polit Bureau are watching your antics. It is like watching monkeys flinging feces at each other.

Putin will do what is in the best interested of Putin....lesser so what is in the best interests of his country. If it will advance his ability to rebuild the former USSR from the ashes, he will do it.

Launching a preemptive nuclear strike on the United States is, very likely, not on that list.

IMO, it is foolish to think it would let alone ask it as a question.

But, keep flinging that poo folks, we are standing by watching your antics and laughing at you at every fling.



Whoa! There was a Russian politico, who, before the election, basically gave the United States voters a choice... an ultimatum, actually: elect Hillary, and get nucked; elect Trump and have peace. It's very reasonable to assume that this guy was a front man, a flying monkey, for Putin because Putin didn't want to take the heat on the world stage for such an "advisory..." threat, actually.

Then there was the sabre rattling about Russia's Satan 2 nuclear weapons, five of which can obliterate the entire East Coast of America.

This is the background, the context that raised the question that serves at the title of this thread.


Saber rattling is part and parcel of politics. The USA does it just as well. And, having a nuke is very very different than launching a nuke on a population. Russia's "threats" should be taken as political posturing. They are managed by countering them with movements of military hardware and "training exercises".

But keep the fear mongering and doom porning up....fling that poo as far and wide as you can.




Be that as it may...

The relationship between Trump and Putin is highly disturbing and highly suspect.
edit on 9-1-2017 by theworldisnotenough because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 04:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: theworldisnotenough

originally posted by: Krakatoa

originally posted by: theworldisnotenough

originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: DAVID64

I for one do not think that Putin would respond in that way. What would be in it for him or his country? Seriously? The fact that an entire group of political losers are searching for any means necessary to invalidate this election is laughable. I am sure he and the Polit Bureau are watching your antics. It is like watching monkeys flinging feces at each other.

Putin will do what is in the best interested of Putin....lesser so what is in the best interests of his country. If it will advance his ability to rebuild the former USSR from the ashes, he will do it.

Launching a preemptive nuclear strike on the United States is, very likely, not on that list.

IMO, it is foolish to think it would let alone ask it as a question.

But, keep flinging that poo folks, we are standing by watching your antics and laughing at you at every fling.



Whoa! There was a Russian politico, who, before the election, basically gave the United States voters a choice... an ultimatum, actually: elect Hillary, and get nucked; elect Trump and have peace. It's very reasonable to assume that this guy was a front man, a flying monkey, for Putin because Putin didn't want to take the heat on the world stage for such an "advisory..." threat, actually.

Then there was the sabre rattling about Russia's Satan 2 nuclear weapons, five of which can obliterate the entire East Coast of America.

This is the background, the context that raised the question that serves at the title of this thread.


Saber rattling is part and parcel of politics. The USA does it just as well. And, having a nuke is very very different than launching a nuke on a population. Russia's "threats" should be taken as political posturing. They are managed by countering them with movements of military hardware and "training exercises".

But keep the fear mongering and doom porning up....fling that poo as far and wide as you can.




Be that as it may...

The relationship between Trump and Putin is highly disturbing and highly suspect.


OK, so?? Many former presidents were controversial when it came to the USSR and Russia (post 1989). That does not mean a thermonuclear exchange is imminent, does it? I answered your question honestly.

Your OP was sensationalist and whoafully fear mongering.

This dynamic of which you speak does not mean it is a bad thing. Being too easy and accommodating with Putin is worse IMO. We (as a country) should be cordial and welcoming dialog with Putin, yes. But we should not be bending over to please him either.



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 05:12 PM
link   
Donald Trump Incorrectly Claims All D.C. Dress Shops Are Sold Out of Inauguration Gowns

Out-of-touch-with reality Trump in his usual braggadocio style of superlatives stated:




“We are going to have an unbelievable, perhaps record-setting turnout for the inauguration, and there will be plenty of movie and entertainment stars,” he insisted...

To further prove that the Jan. 20 event will yield a huge turnout, he claimed that “all the dress shops are sold out in Washington. It’s hard to find a great dress for this inauguration.”


Dear Donald, there are plenty of suitable dresses still available in D.C. Please snap back to reality for the sake of the country.



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 05:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: theworldisnotenough
Donald Trump Incorrectly Claims All D.C. Dress Shops Are Sold Out of Inauguration Gowns

Out-of-touch-with reality Trump in his usual braggadocio style of superlatives stated:




“We are going to have an unbelievable, perhaps record-setting turnout for the inauguration, and there will be plenty of movie and entertainment stars,” he insisted...

To further prove that the Jan. 20 event will yield a huge turnout, he claimed that “all the dress shops are sold out in Washington. It’s hard to find a great dress for this inauguration.”


Dear Donald, there are plenty of suitable dresses still available in D.C. Please snap back to reality for the sake of the country.



At least that is not on the same level as "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor". Talk about divorced from reality. Perhaps we should have considered detaining that president for a 72 hour evaluation after that wildly incorrect statement?



posted on Jan, 9 2017 @ 06:15 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

I don't think I've ever seen one of her things on purpose (I like Sci-Fi) but she has over 100 awards for her acting, including 15 or so "Academy Awards."

What does Trump have again? I mean, besides 6 bankruptcies.



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join