It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Injuries reported after shots were fired at Ft. Lauderdale Airport

page: 13
74
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Soloprotocol

originally posted by: JimSmith
a reply to: tony9802

By "carried the gun on the plane" they mean it was in his checked baggage. He picked up the bag, went to the bathroom to remove the gun, went out and started shooting. That's how I read it.

makes more sense if he went to the bathroom and collected the gun...


That was my first thought.




posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Same with Vegas.



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: EvillerBob

originally posted by: tony9802

originally posted by: TheBulk
WARNING GRAPHIC: www.liveleak.com...


In the video, he has taken shots at passengers collecting luggage..but the report states that he had carried the gun on the plain and that it was upon exiting the bathroom of the plane that he began shooting.. so what is it, he was shooting on the plain or shooting at the baggage claim terminal?


It's all unclear.

Apparently Air Canada have just stated that there is no record of him in their passenger lists and no checked guns on inbound flights to FtL that day.



Very scary..no one with that person's name on their passanger list..this is when the disturbing horror movie soundtrack starts setting in..
edit on 6-1-2017 by tony9802 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bedlam

originally posted by: EchoesInTime
It would explaing the "jewish" comment.
Just speculating.


He's bug# crazy is yet another one. And I'd say it's in the pole position at the moment.

But that's not really an explanation. It's an admission that you can't figure out the explanation.

We could posit that perhaps he's rabidly anti-semetic, and someone somehow mistook him for a Jew. Except he doesn't look Jewish at all. He's clearly either Hispanic or Middle Eastern.



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:48 PM
link   
What's to say the gun was packed, not reported and security didn't see it if they scanned the luggage.



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: tony9802

I've seen them at just about every airport I've been to. There's usually at least one bathroom for every two or three claim areas. Honolulu, where I worked for years, had one set of bathrooms in just about ever claim area.




Perfect, thank you for clearing that up for me..



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:48 PM
link   
Fox is reporting that the shooter is former secret service.

I wonder if he got his training at G4S.



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:48 PM
link   
Shooter did not originate from Canada



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:49 PM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan
Or he is Jewish and was lying. I hate that level of speculation but it is a possibility that shouldn't go overlooked yet.
edit on 6-1-2017 by Noncents because: Expanded upon.



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Nyiah

I knew that when CNN quietly reported that George Zimmerman was Afro-Peruvian. His grandfather was black Hispanic.




A photograph of a well-dressed black man holding a baby is reportedly of George Zimmerman's great-grandfather - and could become a crucial piece of evidence in his murder trial.

CNN aired the picture last night and if its authenticity can be verified then it supports what the accused murderer's family have been saying since the shooting took place - that Zimmerman is from a mixed-race family and did not kill Trayvon Martin because he was black. Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk... Fo



I bet you didn't know that.

The point is, neither Zimmerman or this terrorist Santiago are white hispanic.
edit on 6-1-2017 by Deny Arrogance because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: EvillerBob

originally posted by: tony9802

originally posted by: TheBulk
WARNING GRAPHIC: www.liveleak.com...


In the video, he has taken shots at passengers collecting luggage..but the report states that he had carried the gun on the plain and that it was upon exiting the bathroom of the plane that he began shooting.. so what is it, he was shooting on the plain or shooting at the baggage claim terminal?


It's all unclear.

Apparently Air Canada have just stated that there is no record of him in their passenger lists and no checked guns on inbound flights to FtL that day.


Could be an accomplice was the passenger and this guy knew what suitcase to find.





This is another thing that puzzles me. The Termnal 2 Baggage Claim area appears to be public access/pre-security. If so, that means the whole elaborate scheme of flying a firearm in/accomplices looking for particular bags etc would be pointless. Just walk through the public entrance and start shooting.

It just feels a bit, to borrow a phrase, "stupid-elaborate" in terms of a planned "terrorist" attack.



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Soloprotocol

originally posted by: JimSmith
a reply to: tony9802

By "carried the gun on the plane" they mean it was in his checked baggage. He picked up the bag, went to the bathroom to remove the gun, went out and started shooting. That's how I read it.

makes more sense if he went to the bathroom and collected the gun...


That was my first thought.


So if that person with that name was never even on the flight, I suppose we can say that names are here being fabricated..so are we moving towards a false flag yet?
edit on 6-1-2017 by tony9802 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: roadgravel
What's to say the gun was packed, not reported and security didn't see it if they scanned the luggage.

Then security at both ends should be sacked on the spot. sounds highly unlikely to me two airports would miss it.



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Soloprotocol

Depends on which bag it was in. If it was checked under the aircraft, I can see how they missed it, especially if it was disassembled. If was in a carry on, there's no excuse out there for missing it.

Bags don't get rechecked if it's a connecting flight, unless you go to another terminal, and then only carry on bags get checked again.
edit on 1/6/2017 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:56 PM
link   
Calling for escort for two rescues out of Huizenga hanger.



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Soloprotocol

I pretty sure that many TSA people have been known to be bribed to move contraband. Might be time to search up some stats but I suspect that stuff is kept low keyed when it comes to reporting to the public.
edit on 1/6/2017 by roadgravel because: typo



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:57 PM
link   


This is another thing that puzzles me. The Termnal 2 Baggage Claim area appears to be public access/pre-security. If so, that means the whole elaborate scheme of flying a firearm in/accomplices looking for particular bags etc would be pointless. Just walk through the public entrance and start shooting.

It just feels a bit, to borrow a phrase, "stupid-elaborate" in terms of a planned "terrorist" attack.


Isn't baggage claim area is all airports accessible to public? I think, anyone can walk in with a gun till the security check point in most airports.



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: tony9802

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Soloprotocol

originally posted by: JimSmith
a reply to: tony9802

By "carried the gun on the plane" they mean it was in his checked baggage. He picked up the bag, went to the bathroom to remove the gun, went out and started shooting. That's how I read it.

makes more sense if he went to the bathroom and collected the gun...


That was my first thought.


So if that person with that name was never even on the flight, I suppose we can say that names are here being fabricated..so are we moving towards a false flag yet?


I'm guessing they identified him so fast from reading his military I.D.
What's odd is that no Air Canada flights are saying he was a passenger.



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: tony9802
Very scary..no one with that person's name on their passanger list..this is when the disturbing horror movie soundtrack starts setting in..


Maybe he walked into the baggage claim area from outside, never having been on a plane. Maybe he was picking up something in the luggage carousel. Like a giant teddy bear full of coc aine (that happened one place I lived).



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:58 PM
link   
a reply to: VimanaExplorer

Yes they are.
edit on 1/6/2017 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
74
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join