Kids TV show has Lesbians., page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 9-2-2005 @ 03:32 PM by wellwhatnow
Check out these magazine covers. These magazines are in most grocery stores and are well with in the reach of children.

the current Cosmopolitan Magazine cover
the cover says "Would you pay for sex?"

cosmo.ninemsn.com.au...


The March issue of seventeen magazine
the cover says "What turns guys on"

www.seventeen.com...


The National Enquirer - this weeks issue
showing at least 5 shots of peoples nearly nude backsides

www.nationalenquirer.com...

These are just a few I knew off the top of my head and I didn't have to look hard for them.
These magazines are on the shelves right now. They are blatant. Your children may already have seen them.

You let this go on but are willing to shut down a show about making syrup. There is no sex on the Buster show. There are no tips about great sex, no nude bottoms, no sex period. They are making syrup.

Are you going to tell me that if you see two women making syrup you must take it upon your self to explain oral sex in detail to your child, but when the child reads about what turns men on that doesn't spark any questions / explainations?

Like I said, I don't care if Buster is ever seen again. I don't care about the show. I just think that people are over reacting. I agree that we shouldn't show sex to our kids. Since there is no sex on the Buster show, how has this become such a sexual issue? If you really don't want your kids exposed to sex, let's go after the people who are really doing just that. Let's start by putting those magazines up too high for kids to see instead of floor level at the check out counter.

Edit - magazine links

[edit on 2/9/05 by wellwhatnow]


reply posted on 18-2-2005 @ 06:35 AM by twitchy
No my point was that homosexuality is a sexual preference, not some kind of minority status or entitlement. I don't give a flip what people do in their bedrooms and I am far from conservative, but cramming an adult sexual concept down kid's throats through publicly funded broadcasting is an entirely different matter all together. Sexuality is subjective, your preferences are yours to have, but my comparisons to people with foot fetishes was because being homosexual doesn't you mean you have the right to promote and market your sexuality directly to children. How would like your kids watching BD/SM cartoons on saturday morning? Would you object to Foot Fetish Barney? I personally abhor homosexuality, but honestly I don't care if you or anyone else is gay, I don't want my kids exposed to this or any other kind of garbage which is being intentionally marketed to them. Is it really so hard for you guys to understand this concept? As a parent, I try to instill some sense of morality and self restraint to my children, and I don't need television shows which are publicly funded on PBS teaching my kids a damned thing about sex, deviant or otherwise. When it comes time for my kids to know why some guys talk funny and live with other men, I'll explain it to them, in my terms, and in my time. It's called parenting, on a broader scale it's called socialization. It's my job as a parent, not Teletubbies or any other cartoon. Keep sexuality where it belongs, in adulthood. It isn't about your rights, it isn't about my rights, it's about common friggin decency and respect for families that might think its not ok for Bert and Ernie to sleep in the same bed.


reply posted on 18-2-2005 @ 08:49 AM by Odium
“adult sexual concept”

So is heterosexuality.

“How would like your kids watching BD/SM cartoons on saturday morning? Would you object to Foot Fetish Barney?”

As their parent, I’d decide what they watch. I’d not care if it was on T.V. or not, but I have the choice on what they’ll get to see.

“teaching my kids a damned thing about sex”

You should of done that, not T.V. sorry but where I live, most kids by 10ish know what a ‘homosexual’ is. Maybe that’s the difference? Saying that...I don't know many kids who stay inside, most go out and play around here...guess that's why we have so few fat people. =|

“deviant or otherwise”

Over here we don’t think someone’s a ‘deviant’ sexually, for being gay, bi-sexual, etc. They make up a large enough proportion of society, that it has established its own sub-culture that is now deemed expectable.

“When it comes time for my kids to know why some guys talk funny and live with other men, I'll explain it to them, in my terms, and in my time.”

Good job there, you might want to stop blacks from being on T.V. as well…oh… and those pesky Muslims. Sorry, but most gay ‘men’ do not ‘talk funny’. Your terms, by the looks of things would raise a very misinformed child. But it’s all good, have him/her hate people for what they do and enjoy.

But be careful…next we’ll have gay-black people on T.V. and you can get the burning crosses out.

[edit on 18-2-2005 by Odium]


reply posted on 21-2-2005 @ 10:23 PM by torch_blackrose
Originally posted by Jemison
I have 4 daughters that are 7, 5, and 3 year old twins. I am not in favor of censorship but I am in favor of not exposing small children to sexuality of ANY kind. Homosexuals are a small percentage of the population and children in homosexual households are an even smaller population. It is not the job of PBS to focus on this subject, expose my children to it and then put me in a position of having to explain it to them long before they are ready to understand it.

I volunteered in my daughters First grade class last month and the teacher had me reading a story about families. One of the pages in the book mentioned a child who lived with his two Fathers. The children were asking me where the mother was and how the child could have two fathers. These 6 year olds were so confused and it was clear that this book was highly inappropriate for this setting and these students.

If you want to discuss homosexuality with your young children, so be it. But if you are going to put homosexual parents on a PBS show that is geared toward 3-8 year olds, or read my first grader books that touch on the subject, you better give me a heads up so that I can make sure that my children are not exposed to something that I feel is MY job to discuss with them when the time is right.

It should be PARENTS discussing this with their children when the children are able to understand it, NOT PBS and NOT the schools. And quite frankly, I didn't have a problem with homosexuals until they decided to push for tolerance in such 'look at us, we're gay, love us anyway' fashion. People like Rosie O'Donnell came out of the closet and referred to herself as a 'Dyke'. When the homosexual community decided to flaunt themselves, make spectacles of themselves, and started to think it was a fantastic idea to tell the world what they do in the bedroom I started getting very offended. I don't shout to the world what I do in the privacy of my bedroom and I don't want to hear what YOU do in yours and that includes straights AND gays. LEAVE IT IN THE BEDROOM!!!

Jemison



ok, im 14 and im bi, im proud of it.








but it's close minded #s like you that downplay people. i am hiding it and only one person knows. why do i hide it??? people like you who downplay it..

it's not like gays say "well we had hot spicy sex last night!! love us for it!" we say "well we are in love!! let us get married" you dumb #

Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Have You Seen the Attention-Grabbing New TIME Cover?
  Posted 14 days ago with 31 member flags
That Does Not Compute
  Posted 17 days ago with 14 member flags
"I AM" the documentary in full on Youtube
  Posted 15 days ago with 11 member flags
The one topic even TED won\'t touch: Income Inequality
  Posted 8 days ago with 10 member flags
Denying Ignorance about Copyright
  Posted 9 days ago with 9 member flags