It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Groundbreaking UFO Video Just Released By Chilean Navy

page: 2
34
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 01:28 AM
link   
My first thought was DRUG SMUGGLER unloading gaseous byproduct from Cocaine production.. like a Chemtrail high for the mountain people.




posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 02:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Alushe

It is a ufo, does not show on radar, no commercial or military planes nearby.

-The thermal spotlights did not match the axel of motion-



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 02:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Alushe
photo and video analyst Francois Louange and colleagues from France, arranged through the French agency GEIPAN

Yes, we worked on this case for the CEFAA during some months and we concluded at the time that all the data were compatible with a medium-haul aircraft (B737, A320...) spotted at a distance from the camera comprised between 37 and 69 km, flying around 298 knots, in view of landing.

A screen of the conclusion of our report (not published yet):




posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 02:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
My first thought was DRUG SMUGGLER unloading gaseous byproduct from Cocaine production.. like a Chemtrail high for the mountain people.


I hope that wasn't your only thought lol. Creative, I'll give you that.

To the op: this is very interesting indeed. I'm very surprised to see something like this come from an official source like the Chilean government



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 03:03 AM
link   
a reply to: elevenaugust

Then why it did not show on any radar? Are the radars that bad? hmm...



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 04:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Alushe

the only thing that comes to mind when seeing this is............... Archons!!



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 05:21 AM
link   
My guess: a stealth aircraft on thermal cam.

For comparison a F35 on thermal cam
edition.cnn.com...

Imagine the plane further away, filmed from the back (so the body is less visible, the jets show up because of heat) even has that heat trail, like in the chile video.
edit on 6-1-2017 by svetlana84 because: typo



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 05:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: Drunkenparrot
It looks to me like a FLIR recording of a commercial aircraft at altitude leaving an intermittent contrail.



I'm thinking along the same lines. The display indicates that the recording is in infra-red, so I wonder if we are essentially looking at a "negative" image: the two dark spots are hot jet engines, and the dark trail may be fuel that is being jettisoned.



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 06:29 AM
link   
a reply to: svetlana84 and you worked that out yourself, yet chilean intelligence say it's unidentified, so they are wrong or you are wrong.
I know who my money is on. Unless they are being deliberately wrong to push an agenda, I will say chilean experts on aeronautics are right and they have already found what you said not to be the case, to me that would be the first thing they would have looked at.

im not discounting an agenda btw, they may need funding for a new space program or such like things.
awareness to the cause and all that.
edit on 6-1-2017 by Davg80 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 06:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: svetlana84
My guess: a stealth aircraft on thermal cam.

For comparison a F35 on thermal cam
edition.cnn.com...

Imagine the plane further away, filmed from the back (so the body is less visible, the jets show up because of heat) even has that heat trail, like in the chile video.


I think the Chilean are not dumb enough to rule out a plane. Surely all aircraft in the area would have been checked?



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 07:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Davg80

It's almost as if some people just watched the video and didn't read any of the report or something....



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 08:23 AM
link   
a reply to: elevenaugust

Good to see you again elevenaugust.
I agree with your summation, it makes total sense and correlates with what I see in the video.
edit on 1-6-2017 by Springer because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 08:40 AM
link   
If we're seeking calibration of the Chilean commission's competence, and if Kean's article is correct, I have reasons to doubt them.

I did notice this paragraph:: "It was confirmed that no space debris entered the atmosphere on that date in that location, and in any case, such an object would have fallen rapidly and not flown horizontally. Two independent experts on explosives told CEFAA staff that in such a scenario, the rounded vehicle would explode in the air due to the high internal pressure, and that the gas would catch fire in a flash. And any such re-entries would have been communicated to the Chilean government so that aircraft can be warned, as is the protocol."

This paragraph is nonsense.

The most that could be confirmed is that no object was predicted to reenter along a path thousands of miles long that crossed the region that the target was thought to be in -- nobody can predict a location where a low Earth orbit reentry will actually occur nor does the US DoD normally disclose what its highly classified space-based IR cameras observe.

Reentering satellites do NOT "fall rapidly", during their fireball phase they are very close to horizontal, descending at a shallow angle.

Also, "experts on explosives" in Chile know nothing about the thermal environment of hypersonic reentry nor about what spacecraft would or wouldn't do under such conditions.

And there is no protocol to warn governments about satellite reentries to allow air traffic to be warned off -- that entire sentence is imaginary, since nobody can predict WHICH governments a demising satellite will burn up over..

I don't think it was a reentry -- it lasted too long, so it wasn't a burning satellite.

Just a burning competency report on the commission.



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 08:56 AM
link   
Chile is a country that "wants to believe"

Looks like a comnercial jet decellerating and possibly decending while on approach.

Heres something i wonder. Thermal dissipation rates and profiles in contrast to atmospheric turbulance.

My hypothesis:

A Turbulant thermal dissipation profile change.

If the jet is on approach it probably has its engiens dialed back. It was estimated by the above poster to be going 300 knots. Not the normal cruising of 550. So i would think aircraft is on aproach.

What do aircraft do on approach to further break their speed. Momentarily deploy flaps on the top of the wings. This should cause a bunch of turbulance on an otherwise still air in a plume trailing the aircraft.

Can turbulant air alter the thermal dissipation of the otherwise mostly homogenous air and show up on a thermal cam calibrated sensitively enough or just right as a big colorful plume?

Think of it this way the jet exhaust and particulates are entering the cold air at a consistant flow. Thermal calibrated to see the heat of aircraft. Doesnt pick up exhaust. Its still there but just out of the envelope the camera detects or is just washed put somehow. Aircraft deploys upper flaps. Makes a turbulent plume of air momentarily behind aircraft. That turbulant plume has very different thermal dissipation profile than before and is now in cameras sensitivity envelope and magically appears.
edit on 6-1-2017 by BASSPLYR because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 08:57 AM
link   
Also pleasure to see mr oberg in here. Hello.
edit on 6-1-2017 by BASSPLYR because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 09:03 AM
link   
a reply to: BASSPLYR

i think you and elevenaugust hit the nail on the head.

looks like vapor trails in different thermal conditions and then being picked up on the FLIR



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 09:09 AM
link   
duplicate thread......I believe this was on a topic started yesterday....



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 09:14 AM
link   
a reply to: penroc3

Well elevens conclusions are different than mine and probably more sound. Im just throwing a possible hypothesis out there.

But a ufo in the terms of some exotic propulsion i think not.

Looks like a jet on approach. Im fsirly certain 9f that. What mundane thing is causing the plume is up for grabs.



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 09:34 AM
link   
nevermind forget i said that
edit on 6-1-2017 by humanoidlord because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 6 2017 @ 09:43 AM
link   
a reply to: Zcustosmorum

interesting!




top topics



 
34
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join