Very interesting article - and yes - with satanists at the helm, you can be sure unjustified and dangerous interventions upon natural selection - and
its naturally superior abilities - will be taken by Humans drunk on a promothean hubris.
It always amuses me. The oaf who does this and doesn't worry about the consequences is dissociated from the effects that it his interventions will
create: he literally believes himself to be invulnerable - as if he himself wasn't made up of the same stuff of the natural world - and by screwing up
the genes of various organisms (especially those we eat) you are essentially forcing your own body to accomodate the change i.e. it disturbs your own
body, and puts you and yours in just as much trouble.
On the other hand, I can only use my power of projective imagination to consider what it must be like to be an "illuminati". How good and strong they
must always feel - and how vulnerable they are to the words and beliefs of others - filling them with confidence that only exists because Humans being
mutually stimulate one another towards a state of "shared-intentionality". When achieved, your body sits there as if it were heaven
, by which I
mean, intrinsically sustainable with no effort on your part.
These people are only happy, then, in playing these sorts of games with other people - people who if they knew, would find the powers that be to be
intensely psychologically ill - on a level that far surpasses - or equals - the serial killers and sadists that regularly shock the public.
But give the sadist power - and he will truly feel himself - and naively consider himself - to be a god among men, as if the conditions he props
himself upon were sustainable - as if his emergent mind didn't rely on matter.
Climate change is quickly converting the majority of Humans - but this clique at the top - a disease, which spreads in the same mode as a virus -
manages to repeatedly stave off the inevitable - whether or not Humans are around, they won't be here either - and terra forming mars and living there
will be no more possible (have fun avoiding the thousands upon thousands of obstacles that lie in your way: a mere speck of debris can shoot right
through the metal exterior of a space ship) then undoing the nightmares to be released by climate change.
Ancient humans - and the elitist cultures they cultivated and then spread among those who managed to become 'elite' themselves - didn't understand how
reality worked - relying upon a mode of inquiry (occultism) that is intrinsically deceptive - intrinsically based upon the self's own emergent
structure - and so for good reason did Aristotle deride Plato's naive acceptance of an "ideal realm" that had no relation to the real-world we
interact with. Aristotle was a scientist - a skeptic who was allowed himself to become more of a "humanist", than the deluded Plato who believed that
society should be run by "benevolent" aristocrats - people who are clearly corrupted by their power and advantage, and do not articulate - because of
the absence of a plausible physical theory - the way their bodies mutate and distort their reasoning processes - always guiding them through the
dimension of feeling (a primitive form of knowledge, indicated by the attraction or repulsion of embodied response) to the most short-term
advantageous interpretation, with a rationale and "reason" that always excludes some supervenient principle, such as the golden-rule - the rational
logic of interpersonal process, cause and effect, and the concept of feedback loops, which overrules Platonists and Pythagorean obsession with
mathematics - to which a theory has been crafted out - upon the "debris" which underlies the formation of their deluded minds - that for many,
provides a very plausible framework for why their way of being is "truer" than the ignorant wants of the masses.
Simple justification. Easily explained by a rational, Aristotelian approach, that seeks to attune to nature - ala Goethe's scientific method - to gain
some knowledge about the nature of the structure in question. Gone with the trash will be the a priori assumptions - borne from the unacknowledged
NEEDS of those making the proposition - which gives precedence to some "perception" or knowledge, a "gnosis", as it were, which then "makes sense"
i.e. renders coherent, all that follows.
The human is a pattern detecting machine - and so long as a coherent pattern is maintained, the mind/self feelings comfortable and relaxed.
Nothing is more delusional than assuming a perspective that does not begin from the external world - the stuff which makes it up, and to which we
ourselves are made up.
Whatever gnosis exists exists as a function of the relationship between self and world, and seeing a common identity. It does not cherry pick - and it
certainly prohibits "the end justifies the means" thinking - because the means, as the Self honestly accepts - structures the self as structured by
the effects it creates in the world i.e. through feedback processes.
edit on 6-1-2017 by Astrocyte because: (no reason given)