It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2017

page: 9
54
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 5 2017 @ 01:56 PM
link   
a reply to: crappiekat

All I can say is that it was updated sometime between 10.00 UTC on the 29th Jan and today. 'Fraid I can't be more accurate that that as I don't go into the program that often - once a week normally. The rest of the time I watch the screen notifications.

I did note that EMSC has 6.0 still but they don't go back and change theirs very often. You will see there have been a few changes recently but none on the EMSC site. I don't normally report on onec that are still in the strong / major quake bands. Maybe EMSC are more accurate initially.

BTW I am confused and I have been up for a day nearly.


edit on 5/2/2017 by PuterMan because: typo typo typo




posted on Feb, 5 2017 @ 02:09 PM
link   
a reply to: wasobservingquietly

Psst! 2017-02-20T12:00:00.000Z

There is no 20th month



posted on Feb, 5 2017 @ 02:29 PM
link   
The QVSData Pro program has been updated to version 4.0.67.13

Your current version should detect the change and offer to download the new version and install it after you close.

If this does not happen please let me know.

They are only very minor changes. Details can be found here



posted on Feb, 5 2017 @ 03:35 PM
link   
further to: muzzy

Very shallow, I went back and had a look on Google Earth, the depth of the sea there is 3.5km, so that makes the quake 1.5km deep below the sea floor
also USGS had
3.9 km ± 3.4
which is only leaving 0.5km deep worst case scenerio the measurements are wrong



posted on Feb, 5 2017 @ 10:41 PM
link   
As usual when I don't download NZ data for 24 hrs things start to go to the dogs, yesterday ........

Shallow
Public ID 2017p095675
Intensity severe
Universal Time February 5 2017, 9:35:56
NZ Daylight Time Sun, Feb 5 2017, 10:35:56 pm
Depth 5 km
Magnitude 5.1
Location 120 km west of Te Anau
Latitude, Longitude -45.41, 166.16
www.geonet.org.nz...



posted on Feb, 5 2017 @ 10:50 PM
link   
earthquake.usgs.gov...-info

This area is really picking up.


www.emsc-csem.org...

The depts range from 100km to 2km. Is that area ripping open?

Muzzy

USGS has it as a 4.8

earthquake.usgs.gov...-info
edit on 5-2-2017 by crappiekat because: to add link

edit on 5-2-2017 by crappiekat because: I have got to learn how to embed. Sorry!

edit on 5-2-2017 by crappiekat because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-2-2017 by crappiekat because: to add



posted on Feb, 5 2017 @ 11:07 PM
link   
a reply to: PuterMan

Ah.

I have some fixing to do.




posted on Feb, 5 2017 @ 11:44 PM
link   
a reply to: crappiekat

Both Turkey and offshore Ford land have been pretty quiet for a while,
that is 5+ I mean



posted on Feb, 6 2017 @ 11:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: crappiekat
earthquake.usgs.gov...-info

This area is really picking up.


www.emsc-csem.org...

The depts range from 100km to 2km. Is that area ripping open?

Muzzy

USGS has it as a 4.8

earthquake.usgs.gov...-info



I'm just commenting that Asia, from Turkey over to India, has becoming a little "clustery". And as Muzzy said, it's been kinda quiet in the whole Mediterranean (oh my god, i spelled Mediterranean correctly.) area. About half a year ago, the whole area was more active, and I would like to include Italy and North Africa into the equation. We've all seen how Italy has been very active for quite some time. I'm still waiting for the Greece/Turkey big one. Let's think about it. We've had some big stuff on the western side of Turkey (Italy), and lot's on the eastern side, Nepal etc. Just sayin

Just to clarify, I'll list the bumps that cross Asia. Turkey, Caspian Sea, Turkmenistan, (I spelled it wrong), Afghanistan, India, and China. All with moderate bumps in a tight window. i haven't checked the moon. I'm only thinking moon and tides after seeing the Caspian Sea in the mix.


Oh, while I'm here. I think South America will have big band soon. Tons of water and flooding. California got it's rain. I wonder what will happen when the aquifers try to recharge themselves to make up for the depletion that has been severe. Oh, today the moon is at perigee. The full moon isn't for a few days.


edit on 6-2-2017 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2017 @ 01:10 PM
link   
a reply to: ericblair4891

Yes. I was thinking about the Anatloian Fault. (strike slip fault).

I have spent a good part of my morning reading about the faults in the area.

Thx for the reply.



posted on Feb, 6 2017 @ 04:21 PM
link   
a reply to: crappiekat

Without looking to closely at it right now from memory the consensus was that the next one on the Anatolian Fault would be in the west near Istanbul, but that one in Samothraki 6.8Mw in 2014 kind of jumped over Istanbul and now these more south into the Aegean........
is that what you are reading?



posted on Feb, 6 2017 @ 08:36 PM
link   
a reply to: muzzy

Yes but it meet up with other faults. I don't know, I'm looking at the big picture.

I am now reading about, "Isotatic adjustment"

www.reference.com...

I am going down a Rabbit hole. But I am getting back into it.

I kinda lost focus for some time.

edit on 6-2-2017 by crappiekat because: to add link


When I saw this event, it kinda got me thinking about one fault making another fault adjust.
earthquake.usgs.gov...-info
edit on 6-2-2017 by crappiekat because: to add



posted on Feb, 6 2017 @ 09:10 PM
link   
a reply to: crappiekat
Glaciers?? yes that is a bigger picture.

there are a few doom Anatolian fault scenerio stories on this page
www.sciencedaily.com...

and this on the sequencing and cyclical nature of the North Anatolian Fault
www.geology.um.maine.edu...

edit on 02000000363617 by muzzy because: (no reason given)


This article PDF Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering Ross S. Stein 1, Aykut A. Barka 2 and James H. Dieterich published in 1997 is quite interesting as they were right, there was another one to the west in 1999, killed 17,118.
(17 years, 5 months ago)
it has been quiet since.
edit on 02000000363617 by muzzy because: (no reason given)


if you Google North Anatolian Fault and switch to images you might see a few maps like this, showing the sequences going west, but this is mine and it's not so clearly showing that, they jump back and forth, I used M6.5 and bigger quakes


is this the old story of making the data/facts fit the argument???
I won't press the issue, because they predicted the 1999 quake based on their maps

maybe if I just used 7+ it might come out the same as theirs.
but I will soon run out of ATS time to draw that (4 minutes to go)
edit on 02000000363617 by muzzy because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2017 @ 10:28 PM
link   
You can get more detail from KOERI about the Turkish quakes, if you don't already have the link, text and maps
www.koeri.boun.edu.tr...
but I like my own version, by magnitude colour

KML file (opens in Google earth)

SUMMARY
mag1= 3
mag2= 179
mag3= 39
mag4= 5
mag5= 2
mag6= 0
mag7= 0
total= 228
TTNT= 2411.567
edit on 02000000363617 by muzzy because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 7 2017 @ 05:36 PM
link   
Asia is still active. Turkey and now Pakistan at 6.3M



posted on Feb, 7 2017 @ 07:54 PM
link   
Thank you Muzzy for the links. Really!!! Thank you.

This rabbit hole is taking me deeper and deeper.

I am learning alot, but at the same time, I have more questions.

I like your mag version too.
It makes it easier to see what I am looking at, and for.



posted on Feb, 7 2017 @ 07:56 PM
link   
a reply to: ericblair4891

Yes Eric.

I am watching this area alot.

As I have said above, I am looking at "Isotatic adjustment"

Things are melting. Things are changing.



posted on Feb, 7 2017 @ 08:00 PM
link   
6.3 WSW Pasni Pakistan
earthquake.usgs.gov...-info

Crustal adjustment?
edit on 7-2-2017 by crappiekat because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 8 2017 @ 12:47 PM
link   
Couple of quakes in Romania
4.7
and
4.4
likely Vrancea Deep at it again, 127km and 127km deep respectively.
Not sure if these are related to the Turkish quakes at Canakkale or not?
Looking at the Moment Tensor on GFZ they are in the opposite quarters.
But I have never got my head around these MT's and how to read them, so it may mean nothing.
That Vrancea Deep is quite interesting I was reading about it a while back, it is like a big narrow crack in the Crust that doesn't seem to be related to any other subduction or transform faults in the eastern Europe or Asia Minor area
edit on 02000000383817 by muzzy because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 9 2017 @ 07:32 PM
link   
400 whales strand
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Full Moon
time.unitarium.com...
Big Quake?

Why do these 3 go together?
I don't think they do, but the combination has happened before if I recall
edit on 02000000393917 by muzzy because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
54
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join