It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: ColaTesla
Oh shutup. Don't get all nasty with me then try to take the high road when I refuse to engage and call you on it. Get out of here. You took the low road when you brought up irrelevant discussions I have in other topics. So no YOU GTFO out. We are done. You ended our conversation already.
Yeah... I was previously insured, and now I'm not. It got much too expensive. I'll pay the fine because it's cheaper.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: butcherguy
Most people are happy with it.
Can you show me I'm wrong?.
Let's wait for some responses.
I don't personally know anyone that is happy with it, and that includes people that were previously uninsured.
originally posted by: ColaTesla
a reply to: Krazysh0t
That is not true, They simply massaged the figures to make it look that way, And did not include certain people in the statistics, like the long term unemployed, Many of the "employed" people they did include, Where part time workers and not full time employed.
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: ColdWisdom
Why do people keep giving Obama credit for "taking out" Bin Laden?
Obama had nothing to do with it. IF it even happened the way the official story says, and that's a big if.
The intelligence communities located Bin Laden and the SEAL team went and did the work while Obama sat in an air conditioned room in the White House watching it on TV eating popcorn.