It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Assange To Hannity: Source For WikiLeaks Was Not Russian Government

page: 1
25
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:
+1 more 
posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 10:15 PM
link   
OK here we go again.

Julian Assange says he didn't get the Podesta emails or the DNC emails from Russia !!

He also said he didn't get them from any state party.

Julian says this on an interview with Hannity that will be on TV Tuesday night.

Who do YOU believe? Assange or President Obama ?


Assange To Hannity: Source For WikiLeaks Was Not Russian Government

Assange said Russia was not the source for the DNC and John Podesta hacks.

HANNITY: Can you say to the American people, unequivocally, that you did not get this information about the DNC, John Podesta's emails, can you tell the American people 1,000 percent that you did not get it from Russia or anybody associated with Russia?

JULIAN ASSANGE: Yes. We can say, we have said, repeatedly that over the last two months that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party.

Hannity's full interview with Assange will air Tuesday night at 10pm ET. More from the interview:




posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 10:16 PM
link   
Even if he did, he would never tell you.


Can't wait until we kick him out of Britain and he stops wasting tax payer money.


+3 more 
posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 10:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408

Technically, he's not in Britain / UK.

How's he wasting UK tax money?



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 10:22 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Let's see, do I believe the administration/CIA or Assange??

Yeah, think I will go with Assange on this one.......



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 10:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
Even if he did, he would never tell you.


Can't wait until we kick him out of Britain and he stops wasting tax payer money.


Technically he is not in the UK, he is in Ecuador.



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 10:27 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Just because the package that he received the emails in didn't have a return address that said "From Russia", doesn't mean that it wasn't authorized by the Russian government, and Russian "technology" wasn't used.

Perhaps Assange received them by currier!



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 10:30 PM
link   
a reply to: crazyewok & IIB

www.telegraph.co.uk...

Then why are we paying for him?

Tell Ecuador to pay up or take him home.



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 10:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: xuenchen

Just because the package that he received the emails in didn't have a return address that said "From Russia", doesn't mean that it wasn't authorized by the Russian government, and Russian "technology" wasn't used.

Perhaps Assange received them by currier!



A truly trailblazing analysis !!



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 10:34 PM
link   
I trust Assange more thany any politician in the world. They never seem to trust each other much either...



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 10:35 PM
link   
a reply to: windword

I did my laundry the other day and was surprised at how bright my whites were when I folded them... I could have suspected the OXY clean, but no way... it must have been the Russians!

Thanks Putin, for making my whites so bright!



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 10:37 PM
link   
Didn't Assange already confirm that it was given to him by the CIA/FBI ?

Ex-CIA Steve Pieczenik says that is the case:




posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 10:42 PM
link   
I really have mixed feelings on this.

But, you can't unring the bell.

We had the emails and Hillary never claimed they were edited.

But, I hate that hacking and thievery that went with it.



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 11:02 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

How many times has Assange lied to us?

Now how many times has the Obama administration lied to us?

I absolutely believe Assange.



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 11:05 PM
link   
a reply to: JacKatMtn

I'm just trying to give Assange the benefit of the doubt. My government's intelligence agencies are confident that the hacking was done by Russian actors. I trust them more than I trust Assange. But, that's just me!



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 11:08 PM
link   
The only to resolve this is a trial.

Obama has the burden of proof and has utterly failed to provide anything substantial so far.



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 11:13 PM
link   
a reply to: windword

No problem with your trust of the alleged agency allegations, versus my suspicion of those same agencies..

It is an actual battle going on within those agencies.... a war, so to speak....

I am rooting for my side to win that battle... If my side wins... America wins...

If my side loses... Globalists prevail....



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 11:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Deny Arrogance

When China hacked the US federal government civil servants' info, what proof did you get/require to believe the report? When N Korea hacked Sony, what proof did you get/require believe they did it?


edit on 2-1-2017 by windword because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 11:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: JacKatMtn

I'm just trying to give Assange the benefit of the doubt. My government's intelligence agencies are confident that the hacking was done by Russian actors. I trust them more than I trust Assange. But, that's just me!





The confident government agencies are only confident that some people will believe their BS. They don't have much respect for those that believe them..



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 11:23 PM
link   
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed


Do you believe that China hacked the US civil servant data base? How about N Korea's supposed Sony hack, do you believe the intel reports?



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 11:23 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Assange isn't going to give up his sources.

Who had the most to gain from Trump winning?

Obvious suspect is Russia.

Second Obvious suspect is the GOP.

Third suspect is someone with a grudge that wanted to see Hillary lose.

People don't exactly attempt to influence an election just for fun. There was a political motive behind the hacks.

If you rule out Russia then you're entertaining an even scarier idea that people in our government are willing to break the law to influence an election for their own gain. That's the kind of stuff dictators do.

Sort of like the GOP in North Carolina gerrymandering districts, then passing a law to limit the incoming Democrat Governor's power.




top topics



 
25
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join