It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sick of government spying, corporate monitoring, and overpriced ISPs? There's a cure for that.
THE INTERNET may seem amorphous, but it's at heart pretty physical. Its backbone is a huge array of fiber-optic, telephone, and TV cables that carry data from country to country. To gain access, you need someone to connect your house to that backbone. This is what's known as the "last mile" problem, and it's usually solved by large internet service providers such as AT&T and Comcast. They buy access to the backbone and charge you for delivering the signal via telephone wires or cable lines. Most developed nations have plenty of ISPs, but in poor countries and rural areas, the last-mile problem still looms large. If providers don't think there's enough profit in household service, they either don't offer any or do it only at exorbitant rates.
WHILE MESH networks were created to solve an economic problem, it turns out they also have a starkly political element: They give people—particularly political activists—a safer and more reliable way to communicate.
In an Occupy-style scenario, police may try to shut down texting via Verizon and AT&T only to discover that activists have their own private Serval channel.
Even so, alternative networks are a pretty subversive idea, one that has attracted some strange bedfellows. The State Department recently ponied up almost $3 million to support Commotion, because officials think it could help freedom of speech abroad. But given the revelations about NSA spying (Commotion's developer, OTI, is considering joining a lawsuit to challenge the agency's surveillance program), the software is likely to gain traction among activists here at home. "It makes all the sense in the world," Meinrath says.
The notion of a truly independent global internet may still be a gleam in the eye of the meshers, but their visionary zeal is contagious. It harkens back to the early days of the digital universe, when the network consisted mostly of university scientists and researchers communicating among themselves without corporations sitting in the middle or government (that we know of) monitoring their chats. The goal then, as now, was both connection and control: an internet of one's own.
a reply to: brutus61
How to Keep the NSA Out of Your Computer
originally posted by: Slichter
Unfortunately you can't request a page through a server without that request being logged.
Proxy servers are probably even worse since most encrypt your request tunnel.
Public libraries are often the easiest way to communicate anonymously since you may not be using a machine registered to you.
originally posted by: brutus61
Sick of government spying, corporate monitoring, and overpriced ISPs? There's a cure for that.
WHILE MESH networks were created to solve an economic problem, it turns out they also have a starkly political element: They give people—particularly political activists—a safer and more reliable way to communicate.
In an Occupy-style scenario, police may try to shut down texting via Verizon and AT&T only to discover that activists have their own private Serval channel.
Even so, alternative networks are a pretty subversive idea, one that has attracted some strange bedfellows.
How to Keep the NSA Out of Your Computer
Hooray for mesh networks! I'm getting my Open-WRT-based router warmed up even as I type! Anyone else in Woodstock ready to create the first two local nodes of the un-Internet here? Anybody got a webserver running already in the village! Let's meme and rememe this one, folks!
Jai Jai Routeshvara
P.S. There is no way, absolutely no way, to keep the NSA out of a network. If they need a way in to an ad-hoc network they'll find it and use it almost as fast as you can say "zero-day exploit"! Afterall, even if the network itself is all-but-secure, the individual users and devices are most definitely not.