It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

bush vs muslims

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 28 2005 @ 08:49 AM
link   
Isnt bush just as extreme and just as in love with killing innocents as the so called extremist muslims. Bush thinks he saves the world out of gods name and so do the muslim extremist. Theyre both just as wrong. Its amazing that after the american people have been fooled for i dont know how many times by theyre leader, theyre kids being killed out of the name of bush and still theres soo many here defending him..that really makes me laugh..you also still think hussein had wmd dont yall..
sorry been away for some time here, maybe its been said b4..cheers, j-




posted on Jan, 28 2005 @ 10:50 AM
link   
Absolutely. Dubya is just a baby-eating megalomaniac who wants nothing more than an excuse to open a can of sunshine on Mecca.
[/leftist]

Saddam did have WMD. He just stopped making them after 1992 and disposed of almost everything before the USA invaded in 2003...

...while simultaneously preparing for the lapsing of the sanctions which he believed would happen soon, by trying to build up his production capacity so that as soon as the pressure was off, he could jump into restoring his arsenal of nasty chemicals.


100,000 civilian deaths in Iraq, not innocent deaths. Some of them were innocent, but many of them were terrorists.



[edit on 1/28/2005 by BeefotronX]



posted on Jan, 28 2005 @ 11:29 AM
link   
Don't you think it would be hard to count how many of the dead were terrorists or not, Do the terrorists have uniforms. So there really is no way to tell except what numbers we are given which can't always be trusted.



posted on Jan, 28 2005 @ 11:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by BeefotronX100,000 civilian deaths in Iraq, not innocent deaths. Some of them were innocent, but many of them were terrorists.
[edit on 1/28/2005 by BeefotronX]


proof?? no???

Most??? really? Can you contact the dead?



posted on Jan, 28 2005 @ 11:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by jozuph
Isnt bush just as extreme and just as in love with killing innocents as the so called extremist muslims. Bush thinks he saves the world out of gods name and so do the muslim extremist. Theyre both just as wrong. Its amazing that after the american people have been fooled for i dont know how many times by theyre leader, theyre kids being killed out of the name of bush and still theres soo many here defending him..that really makes me laugh..you also still think hussein had wmd dont yall..
sorry been away for some time here, maybe its been said b4..cheers, j-


Your opening title is false so why should any else of make sense.

Why cant these Bush haters construct something tangible for a once rather than quoting from their anti-war hand book.



posted on Jan, 28 2005 @ 11:37 AM
link   
Good post BeefotronX,

I would like to also add, that these terrorists deaths are only a small portion that both Saddam and his murdering regime were responsible for. For decades these terrorist regimes have been inflicting innocent deaths in the middle east and around the world. Bush isn't in the middle east to purposely kill innocent people. He is one of the only one that stoop up to finally end decades of bickering between countries over these issues and get some resolve. Its an absolute tragic event when innocent people die, but kind of war that is being faught (terrorists barricading behind women and children) is going to have this happen from time to time. But, think about all the innocents that may have died if BUSH did nothing? These terrorist organizations and regimes would continue rampaging the innocent for decades into the future. But what would some people care?...What might some countries care? They didn't loose thousands of innocent fathers, mothers, brothers, and sisters in a terrorist event?....They only see one way, that is death toll in a war and they automatically label the US as a bargaric state trying to take over the world!!! Our soldiers being killed trying to do somthing about a long past and present problem are not getting the respect in the world they deserve.
Maybe in 10-15 years when IRAQ and Afghanistan are flourishing in success, people can start to appreciate what our cause is there.



posted on Jan, 28 2005 @ 11:39 AM
link   
Vanguard,So bush doesn't clam GOD wants him to kill all the terrorists in the world, and thats not the same as them saying GOD wants them to kill us which they think we are terrorists.

[edit on 28-1-2005 by Kramthenothing]



posted on Jan, 28 2005 @ 11:44 AM
link   
Beeftron? You using and citing that bogus and debunked Lancet Report on those 100, 000?
Might want to try these, if you are:
Iraqi Body Count
IBC is not showing 100,000 or close.

IBC response to the Lancet study estimating "100,000" Iraqi deaths
IBC's explanation on why.

100,000 Dead--or 8,000 --How many Iraqi civilians have died as a result of the war in Iraq?
Article debunking and question the Lancet Report.

Bogus Lancet Study
And one simply debunking it.

More to be had if needed.




seekerof



posted on Jan, 28 2005 @ 11:45 AM
link   
There are still issues with insergents. But the better future of IRAQ is already starting to take shape.

www.cnn.com...



posted on Jan, 28 2005 @ 01:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Halfofone

proof?? no???

Most??? really? Can you contact the dead?


My assumption is based on the notion that American soldiers wouldn't kill innocent people on purpose, and they're very professional so they wouldn't kill a great many innocent people by accident.



posted on Jan, 28 2005 @ 01:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by Seekerof
Beeftron? You using and citing that bogus and debunked Lancet Report on those 100, 000?


I'm sorry. It was the only figure I remembered. Blame the people who inundated me with that number.



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join