It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Left Hypocrisy on Serve / No Serve; Don't Tell Me 'Both Sides Do It'

page: 19
40
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 11:44 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

"Trump's inborn traits."

LOLWUT?

Like his wild orange hair?




posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 11:55 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Yep, it's okay to refuse to decorate a cake in a way that offends you.

It's okay for the Muslim baker to refuse to do it, it's okay for the Christian baker to refuse to do it.

If decorating a cake with "Stephen loves Michael" offends you because the people involved are gay - that's okay. It's okay for a Muslim baker and it's okay for a Christian baker.

Same same.



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 11:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: UKTruth

"Trump's inborn traits."

LOLWUT?

Like his wild orange hair?


Lol, he has more than that to make fun of, and it's been fully exploited in the ad hominems directed towards him by the putrid and highly hypocritical left.



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 11:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: UKTruth

Yep, it's okay to refuse to decorate a cake in a way that offends you.

It's okay for the Muslim baker to refuse to do it, it's okay for the Christian baker to refuse to do it.

If decorating a cake with "Stephen loves Michael" offends you because the people involved are gay - that's okay. It's okay for a Muslim baker and it's okay for a Christian baker.

Same same.


What do you mean by OK?
OK to discriminate against gays if their sexuality offends you?

edit on 2/1/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 11:58 AM
link   
a reply to: Deaf Alien

Maybe he's talking about Trump's tiny little fingers.

But that's not why people were refusing to perform at his inauguration. Had nothing to do with his fingers. Had to do with the awful things he has promised to do to hurt innocent people once he gets in power. Had to do with the awful things he claimed to have already done to people or the things he says he wants to do to people.



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 11:59 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Nope. It's okay to refuse to decorate a cake in a way that offends you.



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 12:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Deaf Alien

Maybe he's talking about Trump's tiny little fingers.

But that's not why people were refusing to perform at his inauguration. Had nothing to do with his fingers. Had to do with the awful things he has promised to do to hurt innocent people once he gets in power. Had to do with the awful things he claimed to have already done to people or the things he says he wants to do to people.


Yes, that's the kind of putrid lefty I was talking about



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 12:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: UKTruth

Nope. It's okay to refuse to decorate a cake in a way that offends you.


With "Stephen loves Michael".
Offended by gays. Refused service. Simple even for you to understand.
Discrimination against gays deemed to be OK, by a hypocrite who thinks it's wrong when someone not in the putrid lefts protected groups do it.

edit on 2/1/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 12:09 PM
link   
you ever think that after word got out how trump treated a group of kids who performed for him, they just didn't want the hassle??

www.usatoday.com...

it's simple, treat enough people badly enough, don't expect them to do you much when it comes to favors!!



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 12:11 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Nope. It's not wrong when a Christian baker refuses to do it either.



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 12:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: UKTruth

Nope. It's not wrong when a Christian baker refuses to do it either.


So discrimination against gays is ok then to you. Good to know.
In both instances the service providers refused service because the patron was gay. NOTHING to do with offensive writing because there was no offensive writing. The fact you are hiding behind some writing on a cake - saying nothing more than "Michael loves Stephen" - to differentiate two cases in order to justify your hypocrisy is in a way, satisfying. It reveals your character fully. Not just a hypocrite, but an entrenched partisan hack too.

edit on 2/1/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 12:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: NotTooHappy
a reply to: ElGoobero

The difference is that the bakers and photographers who refuse to serve LGBT, people of color, people of a different ethnicity, etc...are attacking people for their inborn traits. They're attacking people for the way they were born.

who's discriminating against anyone based on color/ethnicity???
if being gay was inborn the Bible wouldn't condemn it...but that's a different debate.
bottom line, the left wants us to throw our Bibles away and worship the State.


People protesting Drumpf are protesting his words and actions. The man is disgusting. That fact has nothing to do with his skin color, his religion, his sexuality or any other inborn traits. He's just a disgusting human being, so are his supporters.

Trump got, what 45% of the vote? so is 45% of the US public is disgusting? that's worse than 'deplorable'.

I voted for Trump. what on earth makes me deplorable or disgusting? because I didn't want a corrupt and incompetent Hillary in the White House? because I thought a businessman might be a positive change from lifelong politicians?



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 12:21 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Nope. It not discrimination because you refuse to decorate something that is personally offensive to you as long as you apply that refusal to everyone equally.



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 12:22 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

It's simple to us. Apparently it isn't to you. Cake decoration is a "specialized" job. Something that is offered but not in the catalog.

However, if "Trump rules" is in the catalog as a offer to the public, then they must do that writing for everyone, even Hillary supporters.




posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 12:23 PM
link   
a reply to: ElGoobero



the left wants us to throw our Bibles away and worship the State.

Clearly that you have been reading Fox News and Breitbart too much. Take a break.




posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 12:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: UKTruth

Nope. It not discrimination because you refuse to decorate something that is personally offensive to you as long as you apply that refusal to everyone equally.


Still hiding behind non offensive words then. Not surprised.
You can justify discrimination based purely on sexuality in a selective way all you want, it does not hide your hypocrisy



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 12:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: UKTruth

It's simple to us. Apparently it isn't to you. Cake decoration is a "specialized" job. Something that is offered but not in the catalog.

However, if "Trump rules" is in the catalog as a offer to the public, then they must do that writing for everyone, even Hillary supporters.



Oh. more differentiation.
So unless something is in a catalogue you are free to discriminate? Liberal logic and hypocrisy in action.

What kind of catalogue are you referring to?
edit on 2/1/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 12:30 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Uh apparently you have difficulty understanding it. Are business owners free to kick out unruly customers? Is that discrimination?



What kind of catalogue are you referring to?

In the case of bakeries, it's a catalog of cakes.


edit on 1/2/2017 by Deaf Alien because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 12:32 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Nope. No hypocrisy here.

Muslim baker refuses to decorate with words that are offensive to them - okay.

Christian baker refuses to decorate with words that are offensive to them - okay.

Same same.

Muslim baker refuses to sell generic wedding cake to gay couple - bad.

Christian baker refuses to sell generic wedding cake to gay couple - bad.

Same same.



posted on Jan, 2 2017 @ 12:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: UKTruth

Uh apparently you have difficulty understanding it. Are business owners free to kick out unruly customers? Is that discrimination?



What kind of catalogue are you referring to?

In the case of bakeries, it's a catalog of cakes.



What about non bakeries? Which catalogues are they going to use... or do you have different sets of logic for different services? Is there are universal catalogue we can use to work out when liberals deem it ok to discriminate? Given that most bespoke services don't have catalogues, your logic is falling down (which is not surprising given you are clearly a liberal).

As for kicking out unruly customers, yes of course. Can you explain how a person asking for a cake decoration saying nothing more than "Michael loves Stephen" is being unruly?

Now, given I had a whole host of scenarios thrown at me, I will use one (but much more relevant).

Would this be ok?
A white man walks into a bakery and asks for a wedding cake with the words "Michael loves Michelle" written on it. Cake is made.
A black woman walks into a bakery and asks for a wedding cake with the words "Shanice loves Tryone" written on it. She is politely refused.



new topics

top topics



 
40
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join