Should a news outlet allow their reporters to have their own ideals and beleifs, or should it be expected that every reporter follow a SPECIFIC
line in every of a whole spectrum of different lines to do with the world and we crazy ass humans? TO me, nothing screams propaganda outlet like
nothing but the same exact reports coming out from each of scores of reporters and editors. Look at the MSM. No discussions on American Imperialism in
the scope of REALITY allowed. The 'name', the perspective are CENSORED. How many people work in the CNN organization? Or FOX? How about across ABC,
CNN, CBS, FOX, NBC, MSNBC combined how many total employees versus how many reports per year that include the phrase American Empire?
When self-censorship starts at the institutional level all can be lost.
Imagine if you were a reporter and were agnostic, or atheist, or christian, or this, or that, should you be faced with only having a shot at landing a
job at but a tiny fraction of outlets due to whichever that might be? Now factor in your political party and slice a bunch off. Now factor in your
hair color (you know what I mean), and slice some more off. Surely we here in the CONSPIRACY site ought to see how ugly this can be, as to believe in
or even be open minded towards "conspiracy theories" means to never have a shot at landing a job in any of the MSM outlets (which is essentially all
Hell, with any of the religions it gets really messy as they all have sects and endless variants and shades of various nutty beliefs. Apply that job
potential fractionaization model I just described, just laugh yourself
right out of ever trying to get into journalism if you're religious.
One thing that always gets me around here, by this troop who get off on derailing threads that ever have a link to sites like Infowars, well two
#1. WHO is actually doing a report is never a factor, instead it's just the site itself, which is just to be smeared. Not just smeared, and then talk
about the issue, NOPE, I see the threads get derailed for pages on end the same posters dont let up about it. People like who start these kinds of
threads are typical culprits. I mean yeah, everyone criticizes sources, especially about the MSM, but somehow despite the site being driven by outside
sources we manage to have most threads be mostly about the actual topics. I don't see HuffPo threads get destroyed like that. Or CNN and their other
MSM network cohorts (whom are responsible for the deaths of MILLIONS). Little jabs will get made but the topics still persist. But an article from
Infowars, Breitbart, NOPE, the liberal censorship mongers come swooping in and crush all on-topic debate is how it goes far too often.
#2. WHAT is actually being reported goes the way of the toilet. As I already alluded to. When entire topics get derailed, when the people (liberals)
refuse to even analyze the contents, that speaks to pure desperation. It's certainly self-echo chamberization. NOPE! I dont care what the contents of
the article are, what sources it has within it, I wont open it I'll just turn your thread into my pedestal to bitch about how much I hate those
Looking at the OP here, this de facto religious intolerance and by SJW standards anti-semitism we're seeing from an SJW is quite remarkable, is all
I'll say there. Sorry, I couldn't resist, as the SJW Way is afterall crafted verbatim from the "if you criticize Israeli oppression of Palestine and
you're an anti-semite' thing the Zionists came up with to bludgeon people whom try to criticize the Zionist regime.
edit on 30-12-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)