It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

KGB Agent Revealed Ancient Chinese Subversion Strategy For Globalists To Conquer The World…

page: 4
48
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 29 2016 @ 06:20 PM
link   
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Speaking of Anthony Sutton

en.wikipedia.org...



” Sutton's next three major published books (Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler and Wall Street and FDR) detailed Wall Street's involvement in the Bolshevik Revolution to destroy Russia as an economic competitor and turn it into "a captive market and a technical colony to be exploited by a few high-powered American financiers and the corporations under their control"[5] as well as its decisive contributions to the rise of Adolf Hitler and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, whose policies he assessed as being essentially the same "corporate socialism," planned by the big corporations.[6] Sutton concluded that it was all part of the economic power elites' "long-range program of nurturing collectivism"[2] and fostering "corporate socialism" in order to ensure "monopoly acquisition of wealth" because it "would fade away if it were exposed to the activity of a free market."[7]




posted on Dec, 29 2016 @ 06:35 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss




(because nationalism being a right wing thing is a liberal globalist invention, and all globalism does is replace nationalism with an even more grandiose social construct to worship).


It is so obvious to one with a critical eye on history, thank you



posted on Dec, 29 2016 @ 08:09 PM
link   
a reply to: JohnnyElohim

wikipedia isn't always right, more so when it comes to politics and climate change where they show a typical left-wing bias.

As for what the nazis were...

The nazi movement and Hitler himself espoused the idea that individual desires and interests had to be surrendered for "Volksgemeinschaft" (national community). For the common good individuality had to be surrendered.

www.academia.edu...

National socialism is a collective idea in which every individual has to do what's best for the collective good, and the state dictates what is the best for everyone/the collective. Collectivism is based on socialism and communism. Collectivism is not right-wing. Hence nazism, or national socialism is left-wing.

The racism and hatred of the nazis against every minority was inspired from Darwin's theory of evolution. The nazis ideas on evolutionary ethics, eugenics and racism was based on the false idea and claim that the Aryan race was the best. "Survival of the fittest" was ingrained in nazism just like collectivism.

It is a fallacy on your part, and that of other left-wingers, to claim nazism was right-wing when it was just another authoritarian socialist ideology that thought they knew what's best for everyone.


edit on 29-12-2016 by ElectricUniverse because: correct comment.

edit on 29-12-2016 by ElectricUniverse because: add comment.



posted on Dec, 30 2016 @ 11:16 AM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Oh, I see: you weren't actually trying to enter the discussion between ElectricUniverse and I, but were instead trying to cherry pick one statement from context and "call me to task" for it? I answered this:



Anti-immigrant paranoia, anti-Semitism, homophobia, and so on, are indeed vices of the far-right. That does not mean the world is as polar as you suggest. It does not mean that a Communist cannot also be an anti-Semite. You've set what you think to be a clever trap for me but it relies on me accepting your reductionist worldview. I don't.


What part of this do you not understand?

Or are you merely pretending not to, engaged in your game of sophistry, grinning in the mirror, thinking yourself clever? It does not matter that racism is not exclusively the province of the right -- nationalism, fascism, and the clinical othering that go with those philosophies are fundamentally right wing and those things are the fundamental elements of those philosophies and forms of government. Communism, on the other hand, deals primarily with economic models: the vices of the people governed under that system are what they are. Fascism demands of you that you demonize and harm the other. Nationalism, fascism, and other extremist right-wing ideologies nurture these frailties in human nature. Communism may not prevent them, and may indirectly induce conditions where they grow, but that's quite clearly not the same thing.

Your pretending that these nuances do not exist is nauseatingly disingenuous.

Oh, and this quote of yours?



By the way, the globalist liberal tune you guys all march to these days: your straight cis white male bashing "PATRIARCHY CONSPIRACY" theory obsessionism is damn near precisely the same as the Nazi's vs. the JEW CONSPIRACY theory.


And you say it is I who fantasizes about arguing with socket puppet accounts? What in the world are you talking about? I didn't say anything about a "patriarchy conspiracy." Really, what is wrong with you?



posted on Dec, 30 2016 @ 11:22 AM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

A minority of political extremists who support your extremist worldview do exist, yes, and you can quote farm and cherry pick until you are blue in the face. It does not culminate in the alchemy you wish, wherein well-meaning people who support things like social welfare are secretly evil demons who must be slain, and people who throw around racial epiphets and generally wield cruelty with aplomb are in fact our secret saviours. Far-right politics are the poisonous excrement of the human condition and your insistence makes it no other way. Far-left politics are an honest mistake; far-right politics are a commitment to violence and ignorance. It is the way that it is.



posted on Dec, 30 2016 @ 11:26 AM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

What in the world makes you think all far-right politics are about rugged individualism? They are not. The country swung to the right after 9/11, easily supporting foreign wars, the curtailment of civil liberties, and censorship of songs like "Imagine" by John Lennon on the airwaves. That was about national unity. You shuffle definitions to make them suit your extremist view. It does not make you clever or right. It makes you a charlatan.



posted on Dec, 31 2016 @ 01:32 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



new topics

top topics



 
48
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join