It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Paschar0
After reading about Donald Trump's latest tweet about how the U.S. needs to expand it's nuclear capability I couldn't help but think that he likely was in a briefing with people from the military or their contractors and after hearing their side decided "This is a good idea" we should act on it.
Then I thought, what happens when as president he's forced to deal with both sides of an issue and they both have compelling arguments? Up til now, things have been fairly predictable, but Trump is a genuine wild card. Kennedy, during the Cuban missile crisis, (as it was portrayed) was a great example of listening to everyone and then making a prudent decision against pressure. Trump doesn't appear that thoughtful or deep (and yes I want Trump to succeed as the leader of my country), he seems consistently reactionary to me and that's a bit worrisome when it comes to nuclear weapons and other serious matters. Air Force one getting new carpet, no I don't care what he decides.
Anyway, the psychology interests me, anyone have any hard insight as how Trump has reacted in the past when given two compelling choices and how you think he might act as President?
Aww, c'mon...Trump didn't become a billionaire by making bad decisions...Trump has been indirectly involved in politics for 40 years...He's no stranger to what goes on in Washington...
originally posted by: Paschar0
After reading about Donald Trump's latest tweet about how the U.S. needs to expand it's nuclear capability I couldn't help but think that he likely was in a briefing with people from the military or their contractors and after hearing their side decided "This is a good idea" we should act on it.
Then I thought, what happens when as president he's forced to deal with both sides of an issue and they both have compelling arguments? Up til now, things have been fairly predictable, but Trump is a genuine wild card. Kennedy, during the Cuban missile crisis, (as it was portrayed) was a great example of listening to everyone and then making a prudent decision against pressure. Trump doesn't appear that thoughtful or deep (and yes I want Trump to succeed as the leader of my country), he seems consistently reactionary to me and that's a bit worrisome when it comes to nuclear weapons and other serious matters. Air Force one getting new carpet, no I don't care what he decides.
Anyway, the psychology interests me, anyone have any hard insight as how Trump has reacted in the past when given two compelling choices and how you think he might act as President?
originally posted by: BoldAlligator
a reply to: Paschar0
My god, some of you people just aren't paying attention.
Reactionary??? I think some of you are choosing to see what you want.
He's the complete opposite. What you see as reactionary, all his tweets, all his statements, they have purpose and you just aren't cognizant of what he's trying to accomplish.