It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump Let's Make Arms Race !

page: 1
15
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 09:12 AM
link   
news.sky.com...

Here he goes .

This is were it gets nasty .

President-elect Donald Trump has reportedly spoken of an "arms race", the day after he said he wanted America to increase its nuclear capability.

MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski said that in a phone call with her, Mr Trump commented: "Let it be an arms race, because we will outmatch them at every pass and outlast them all."

www.msnbc.com...

We're screwed either way .
Time to strike 1st .

I'm behind trump 100% on this one .
I believe that it's time to stop waiting for our countries to just keep getting attacked and lead with an iron fist .






edit on 23-12-2016 by Denoli because: (no reason given)

edit on 23-12-2016 by Denoli because: (no reason given)

edit on 12.24.2016 by Kandinsky because: Dialed down the shouty title




posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 09:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Denoli

I would't worry to much about it. Trump is still in campaign mode playin to his LIVs, all hat no cattle.

He just says things then flip flops or denies he even said it.

So mutual destruction is ok with you?
edit on 23-12-2016 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 09:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Denoli

Obama would announce our military plans on public television. Our enemies would heed the words.

Trump feigns crazy and instills true fear within those same ears.

This is a tactic to buildup the image of our nation that Obama dismantled.

EDIT: As well as keep the enemies, foreign and domestic, in a real state of confusion.
edit on 23-12-2016 by chadderson because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 09:24 AM
link   
An arms race is by definition around about seventy five percent rhetoric. I would say that Mr Trump has just signalled his ability to play the game as well as everyone else.



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 09:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Denoli
Only a moment ago his opponents were criticising him for being too friendly with Russia.
Evidently he has taken this criticism to heart and is now following their advice.




edit on 23-12-2016 by DISRAELI because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 09:28 AM
link   
If there was a nuclear war then there would be no winner. It isn't a game you win by having more so why build more.



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 09:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: Denoli
news.sky.com...

Here he goes .

This is were it gets nasty .

President-elect Donald Trump has reportedly spoken of an "arms race", the day after he said he wanted America to increase its nuclear capability.

MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski said that in a phone call with her, Mr Trump commented: "Let it be an arms race, because we will outmatch them at every pass and outlast them all."

www.msnbc.com...

We're screwed either way .
Time to strike 1st .

I'm behind trump 100% on this one .
I believe that it's time to stop waiting for our countries to just keep getting attacked and lead with an iron fist .










posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 09:31 AM
link   
Job creation and sustaining in the defence industry and the military are some of the reasons for it.
a reply to: Grimpachi



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 09:36 AM
link   
Buy defense stock..pile up guns..it is going to be a MIC presidency. After seeing how much exxonmobil spend lobbying politicians and they cut out middle man and directly appointed exxonmobil ceo, buy oil stocks as well.



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 09:37 AM
link   
The way things are going in this world and country, many people are doing their own little "Arms Race" called prepping. I think it might be a good idea, for people and Governments alike. If a Government see's that things are getting bad, they are going to make more weapons in preparation for that.
edit on 23-12-2016 by iTruthSeeker because: (no reason given)

edit on 23-12-2016 by iTruthSeeker because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 09:39 AM
link   
The thing is I believe trump , more than I do .
Obama x Hilary = bs
edit on 23-12-2016 by Denoli because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 09:43 AM
link   
Sorry to be that guy but ! (Drumroll)

Your an idiot!

a reply to: Soloprotocol



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 09:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Denoli



Time to strike 1st .


Strike who?

Is somebody threatening us?



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 09:45 AM
link   
Trump is rightly responding to Putin's recent announcement that Russia would increase it's nuclear capability.

But none of this is going anywhere. Russia can't afford an arms race.

This is Putin's noise being met with a real threat in response from somebody he can't dismiss as simply bluffing, like Mr. Red-line.




edit on 23-12-2016 by loam because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 09:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: nOraKat
a reply to: Denoli



Time to strike 1st .


Strike who?

Is somebody threatening us?


Yes they are , don't you watch CNN ?

Ends sarcasm .

North Korea are trying to build an arsenal and will use them on anyone , and I believe there in bed with Russia and China . So thats Makes Korea the flashpoint, then all the toys are out the pram !

All it takes is a bit of bs and the buttons will be pressed
edit on 23-12-2016 by Denoli because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 09:56 AM
link   


President-elect Donald Trump has reportedly spoken of an "arms race", the day after he said he wanted America to increase its nuclear capability


Why not ?

People you can't build nukes and expect them to have an infinite shelf life.

People upgrade their phones,computers, cars,homes faster than our nuke arsenal.

And the older weapons systems are the most costly to maintain.

If you been paying attention to Russian ICBM/MIRV development.

It's nessecary to upgrade from systems that were designed in them 60s and 70s.

It's the freggin 21st century.



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 10:00 AM
link   
a reply to: VimanaExplorer

He chose James Woolsey as his senior adviser on national security issues.

James Woolsey is a:

- former CIA director and extremist neoconservative
- a key member of the Project for the New American Century — a neoconservative think tank largely founded to encourage a second war with Iraq. Woolsey signed a letter in 1998 calling on Clinton to depose Saddam Hussein and only hours after the 9/11 attacks appeared on CNN and blamed the attacks on Iraq.
- served as vice president of Pentagon contracting giant Booz Allen, and as chairman of Paladin Capital Group, a private equity fund that invests in national security and cybersecurity.
- He chairs the leadership council at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a hawkish national security nonprofit, and is a venture partner with Lux Capital Management, which invests in emerging technologies like drones, satellite imaging, and artificial intelligence.

Woolsey went on CNN on Monday and said that he was principally motivated to support Trump because of his plans to expand U.S. military spending.

Article

edit on 23-12-2016 by nOraKat because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 10:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi

Don't worry, there are plenty of respawn points on earth.



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 10:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Denoli

Strike who first? Strike with what, nukes?

You're not tired of war yet?



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 10:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: Denoli

Strike who first? Strike with what, nukes?

You're not tired of war yet?


Posted a bit above . Shakes head .



new topics

top topics



 
15
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join