It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Chicago Democratic Election Judges Pretend to be Republican Judges

page: 1
20

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 09:09 PM
link   
Chicago does it again.

This time our old buddy James O'keefe catches democrat election "judges" posing as Republicans !!!

The law there say an equal amount of Ds and Rs must be there.

Caught.

O’KEEFE: DEM JUDGES POSED AS REPUBLICANS ON ELECTION DAY

Project Veritas has exposed even more corruption by Dems, this time by catching Democrat judges from Chicago on undercover video violating election regulations by pretending to be Republicans on Election Day.

There is supposed to be an equal number of Republican and Democratic judges on Election Day to ensure equal representation and to monitor voting, according to Illinois state law.

The undercover Project Veritas journalist asked judge named Betty Jones what being a Republican judge means.

“Oh, you know what, I’m just a judge I get paid,” Jones said. “I just get paid. I don’t give a green flip. I don’t care what it means.”


maybe they were Russian Republicans !!





posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 09:18 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

This is confusing. So what exactly do these judges do? They say it's to help people? How, by pointing them to the voting booth? Are these people forced to be Republicans because state requires both parties be represented but that no actual Republicans would step up and become judges so here they are?

All of this is confusing an O'Keefe doesn't do a good job of explaining what exactly is going on in this 5 minutes video.
edit on 22-12-2016 by Swills because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 09:35 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Good find


And that Video, wow...



posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 09:36 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen



In the United States an election judge (called an elections inspector, elections officer or poll worker in some U.S. states) is an official responsible for the proper and orderly voting in local precincts. Depending on the state, election judges may be identified as members of a political party or non-partisan. They are generally volunteers or paid a small stipend for their work. Each voting precinct is staffed with multiple judges. The duties include signing in registered voters, explaining voting procedure and use of voting equipment, providing ballots and monitoring the conduct of the election. In states with Election Day voter registration, they also register new voters on election day. Depending on the state, election judges are chosen by a board of elections, county official (such as the county clerk or county auditor), city or township official (such as a city clerk) or the state.


So what's the conspiracy here? Did O'Keef actually catch them in the act of changing ballots or lying to people so they don't vote for Trump? Sounds like what I stated earlier, rules required someone be a R but since no R's in Chicago were available some D's have to become an R. Last I heard, Chicago's Republican demographics wasn't very large? And where in Chicago did O'Keef film this? What neighborhood? So many questions, no real answers. Sounds like a smear job to me.

Unless there was REAL malicious intent, you know election fraud, I don't see the scandal here. But I'm sure that won't stop conservatives from crying wolf.
edit on 22-12-2016 by Swills because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 11:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Swills

If you don't see the problem there, then you are part of the problem.



new topics

top topics



 
20

log in

join