It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama and pals FUNDING terrorism?!?!?!

page: 1
25

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 04:26 PM
link   
ISIS, for years now, has been spreading like a rabid dog through the Middle East. We have heard president-elect Trump talk about getting tough on the terrorist organization, and we have also heard people talking about how Obama is responsible for the rise of ISIS. But how responsible is he? Has Obama's do-nothing policy created a vacuum, or has Obama and friends actually given aid to the terrorists?!

In this thread, I will use "mainstream news" articles in order to prove that Obama and his globalist pals are actually HELPING the terrorists, and I would love to hear what you people think!

Let's start off with this article from The Guardian. This article talks about how President Hussein Obama's White House offered (and later sold) hundreds of billions of dollars in weapons to Saudi Arabia, a country that has been known to fund Al Qaeda, and ISIS as well. In the Wikileaks revelations, we have learned that Saudi Arabia and Qatar are providing "clandestine and financial logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups."

There is also a Washington Post article that shows Iraqi troops and military officers stating that they have seen US military helicopters dropping off food and medical supplies to the Islamic State. This evidence is only testimonial, but still something to chew on. Remember this is Obama's military, and as president he gives these orders.

Let us also look at HSBC, a globalist bank that bought off the White House's investigation into its financing of Mexican drug cartels (See this CNBC article for the full story). HSBC has also been sued for funding Islamic jihadists, notably Hezbollah, the Islamist militant group in Lebanon (Forbes).

Lastly, let's look at Iran. Iran's involvement in Islamic extremism is no secret. They are the biggest state sponsor of terrorism in the world, and the Obama administration signed that Iran deal which kept them from getting nukes, but what else could Iran use that money for? Maybe the economy, maybe foreign transactions, maybe terrorism. Also, the Obama administration recently settled a lawsuit with Iran for 1.7 billion dollars(CNN).

So, HSBC has bought off Obama. Saudi Arabia has bought off Obama and we have sold weapons to them. Big global international banks fund terrorists and have bough off our country a long time ago. And, Obama has been out there getting our taxpayer money and kicking to Iran, a state terrorism sponsor.

Whether Obama is trying to destroy the country, or whether he is just soft, what we do know is that is administration is helping global jihad spread. And now he and his liberal buddies want Syrian refugees to flood into our country. Why do you think he is doing this?




posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 04:33 PM
link   
Because money is the sword we all caress as it slays us.




posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 04:36 PM
link   
January 21 2017, the day ISIS disappears, Just like magic.....



posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 04:45 PM
link   
So you’re saying the west is behind much of the terrorism.
There is a lot of proof this is true and you present some good links to prove it.


Of course people will just dismiss you as a conspiracy theorist even though you have at least circumstantial evidence backing your assertions.


Obama certainly is a puppet of the sinister globalists. Obama literally did NOTHING for the cause of peace around the world and almost as a joke they actually gave this creep the NOBEL peace prize!


Obama has had no vision, no strategic thinking, indeed nothing has come from his “ leadership”. He let the secret warriors just do what they wanted.


And there's a very good reason for Obamas vacuous presidency.

I believe Obama was a 100 Manchurian candidate.

He set up Obamacare just so the GOP can tear it down


Set up the Iran nuclear deal just so Trump can tear it to shreds


Everything he did was under orders to setup Trump’s extremism he will initiate



posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 04:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: ColaTesla
January 21 2017, the day ISIS disappears, Just like magic.....



Isis wont disappear one reason it was created is so Trump can tear it down or try to tear it down with more war on terrorism


The future is very very dim folks



posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 05:02 PM
link   
a reply to: patrononice

Why just focus on Obama? If anything, it's the US gov't that's funding ISIS and this is not a new idea as it's been debated long before Obama took office. So if the US gov't is funding ISIS then that would include both Democrats and Republicans along with the Pentagon.



posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 05:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Swills

Reminds me of when Bush and the Pentagon said 'we're not focused on Osama, we could just go after his lieutenants', and the Democrat's & independents all howled.



posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 05:09 PM
link   
We have been saying this for many years. Who's going to listen now?



posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 05:13 PM
link   
Bottom line by definition there are quite a few in government right up to the highest levels that committed Treason.
The rebels they armed were al-qaeda groups like Al Nusra Front in Syria and others also in Libya. They gave "aid and comfort to the enemy" which our government and armed forces had been fighting since 9/11. It was both sides as McCain and Lindsey Graham along with Clinton and Obama were in on the plans. This is one of the main reasons the establishment was so against Trump because by not being able to control him he could in theory cause quite a #-storm, especially now with certain Generals in the cabinet that have inside knowledge. They even gave Stinger missiles to the Libyan group which half all the arms shipped ended up in Syria. That is the real reason they didn't send in military aid to Benghazi. They knew their aircraft would be in danger of being shot down and by our own MANPADS. That would of destroyed some of the top people in government.

All the information is out there if you care to do the research. I have posted about it before but don't have it all together anymore.


edit on 22/12/16 by spirit_horse because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 05:18 PM
link   
Old news.

America (the US president is head) is one of the major terrorism money suppliers. Sad to say it but the US citizen is as much to blame as the US president. You all sit in the same boat.

Can't blame one without the other!!!
edit on 22-12-2016 by reboot23 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 05:20 PM
link   
a reply to: patrononice

Pretty good timeline scenario !!

Great dot connectors in florescent color.




posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 05:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Swills

Great point!



posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 05:51 PM
link   
"Obama and pals FUNDING terrorism?!?!?!"

WELL?? DUH!



posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 07:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Swills

He made it his personal mission to let us know they were a J.V. team - not to be taken seriously. Remember? And after that statement, they magically had unlimited brand new Toyota trucks with 20mm cannons mounted to them. And Noone has done ballistics to prove it's nato ammo. But, it is. I can tell just from the sound, along with thousands of US military men that have been there. # your bull#, until you've been in war-you got no business telling others your expert opinion on it. I spent 7 1/2 years in that # hole. I know what I'm looking at, do you?



posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 07:21 PM
link   

edit on 12222016 by Natas0114 because: Because I'm screaming at air- no one's listening...



posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 07:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: patrononice

Why just focus on Obama? If anything, it's the US gov't that's funding ISIS and this is not a new idea as it's been debated long before Obama took office. So if the US gov't is funding ISIS then that would include both Democrats and Republicans along with the Pentagon.


Of course IS has been around a long time, long before Obama, and so is the dirty secrets, all of that lies in the complicity of the military and the overwhelming amount of secret services in the US portfolio in perpetuating their grandiosity in all things military. Just ask yourself, where did all those brand new Toyota pickups come from, in Libya and in Syria, it never was so blatant, and no, they weren't stolen but supplied, yet and all one US department, the treasury, was asking the Japanese where they came from, (the Japanese didn't know)



There are loads of pictures like that, which beg another question, WTF was taking the pictures?
So if the pickups were ordered out by the State Department as some allege, on who's advice was than done by, and how good was that advice? Why did the treasury not know? Who is most likely to know everything or anything, or is it that the most fundamental thing wrong with government is those that should know are never told, for any or no good reason?



posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 07:52 PM
link   
This thread is completely wrong, of course. The US has been close allies with the Saudis for a century- it's not Obama's doing.
Obama has been bombing ISIS for years, so saying he's doing nothing it totally idiotic.
HSBC is European I believe, and once again, they've been around for a long time and Obama doesn't run them.
Lastly Iran is not the biggest supporter of terrorism in the world, Saudi Arabia is, the Bush's best friends.

This thread is just a bunch of ridiculous stretches, groping in the dark for anything to try to hit Obama with, as usual.
edit on 22-12-2016 by CB328 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 08:52 PM
link   
a reply to: patrononice

It should be plain to see now for everyone. Obama was a puppet.

So much so in fact that I've considered making a documentary that dissects the entire Obama presidency startimg before his election.

His slogan was change. There was zero change. Only the continuation of the establishment's agenda but with a likeable figurehead at the helm.

That man did nothing that he wasn't told to do. Nothing. And while so many of the uninformed will herald his legacy, underneath his amicable personality was the will of TPTB.



posted on Dec, 22 2016 @ 10:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Swills

Reminds me of when Bush and the Pentagon said 'we're not focused on Osama, we could just go after his lieutenants', and the Democrat's & independents all howled.


To be fair Obama did go for Osama and did get him.



posted on Dec, 23 2016 @ 09:47 AM
link   
a reply to: patrononice

Oh come on. This sort of thing has been going on since Reagen was in office.

You can't blame Obama for policy that's been in place since the 50's.

www.washingtonsblog.com...


edit on 23-12-2016 by grey580 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
25

log in

join