It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: AlbanArthur
Is this not freedom of speech?
No it's potentially inciting a riot.
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: enlightenedservant
Is there a test yes? And you are the gate keeper.
Race baiting is a moving target. This is why it is so dangerous to have any kind of activists on the bench.
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: enlightenedservant
Is there a test yes? And you are the gate keeper.
Race baiting is a moving target. This is why it is so dangerous to have any kind of activists on the bench.
Whatever. You're either trolling, blind, or stupid if you can't see that the guy wearing a gorilla mask, a Confederate flag, a noose, and offering bananas at a BLM march was race baiting. He even told investigators he was trying to provoke the protesters with his actions (HERE).
The fact that you're trying so hard to defend this (for 20 pages at that) shows me everything I need to know about you and your "character".
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
a reply to: Spider879
The hypocrisy over First Lady Michelle is even worse than that. Remember how outraged they were when she first started showing her arms? But apparently Melania's nude and near nude photos are completely acceptable.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: AlbanArthur
Is this not freedom of speech?
No it's potentially inciting a riot.
When they start charging racist BLM who actually do incite riots let me know.
originally posted by: Woodcarver
Are you saying that black people are incapable of restraining themselves? he was taunting and being a twat, but he was not inciting a riot unless you are implying that taunting black people will inevitably start a riot. Which would be racist. Taunting people is not smart, but it is not against the law as far as i know. However, i'll stick by the judges decision.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: AlbanArthur
Is this not freedom of speech?
No it's potentially inciting a riot.
False.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: AlbanArthur
Is this not freedom of speech?
No it's potentially inciting a riot.
originally posted by: zosimov
How about the rope he was carrying? Don't forget to mention the rope with a noose at the end that the pos was carrying.
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: Spider879
The 2 are different. She was a model. And I couldn't care less if M Obama wears sleeveless shirts. Lets worry about things that matter. don't sweat the petty Sh!ft.
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
a reply to: Spider879
Again I am done giving racist Nazis elbow room or breathing space.
You have made your position and intent quite clear. Just make sure you don't run into someone like me. I know the mad masher story. I was there. And I could pound you into a fine powder and there is nothing you could do about it. All the chest thumping is fine until you get your ass handed to you. And then I bet you run crying 'racist' when you get beat down.
Every time I see someone burn a flag I want to reach down their throat and rip out their spine. That is two separate and distinct problems . One is he has the right to burn the flag. The other is he has no spine. If he had one he might man up and find a better way of expressing himself.
Free speech is exactly that - free speech. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it wrong. Promoting violence to stop someone from saying things you don't like - that is wrong. And people have been fighting to defend that right for a long time. Don't expect that to stop just because you got your little feelings hurt.
As horrible as it is, the intent to harm has to be established.