It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

More Americans voted for HRC than any other losing presidential candidate in US history

page: 1
12
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 05:53 PM
link   


The Democrat outpaced President-elect Donald Trump by almost 2.9 million votes, with 65,844,954 (48.2%) to his 62,979,879 (46.1%), according to revised and certified final election results from all 50 states and the District of Columbia.




How Trump’s performance in the popular vote stacks up

Hillary Clinton beat President-elect Donald Trump by 2.1% in the national popular vote. Her nearly 2.9 million vote advantage is the largest raw total among candidates who did not win the presidency.

Only two others, Andrew Jackson (1824) and Samuel Tilden (1876) won by a larger percentage without also claiming the White House.


By historical percentage of the popular vote lost vs. raw vote totals...trump ranks below in red ..With only two other Presidents ever seeing the WH while losing by a larger margin...and no President in History ever being elected with more Americans having not voted for him.




I know facts aren't popular around here lately...nor is dissent from the right wing Propaganda factory...but ATS deserves facts and balance..

So...Flame away...When all the BS evaporates...Trump is still POTUS..and he is still the most unpopular POTUS ever elected.

LINK


edit on 21-12-2016 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)



+15 more 
posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 05:55 PM
link   
Sure they were real votes?

On a side note: I'd say Trump is the most loved to hate President in history and probably more closet supporters also. ..... Come on, let it out. Say it with me: "yay Trump!"
edit on 21-12-2016 by Rosinitiate because: (no reason given)


+16 more 
posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 05:55 PM
link   
"More Americans voted for HRC than any other losing presidential candidate in US history"

Yeah, spent more money, too. Makes the loss even more embarrassing, and scam-like.



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 05:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Rosinitiate
Sure they were real votes?


You boys need new material...

Reality and facts last...BS evaporates likes burps in the wind...
edit on 21-12-2016 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)


+18 more 
posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 05:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Rosinitiate

There's the rub.

So many fake votes and so much voter fraud in this election it's probable that if only real votes were counted she probably in actuality lost the popular vote as well.



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 05:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

Just America lowering the bar for POTUS. A reality TV personality, failed business man, and con artist is now the leader of the free world and commander of the most powerful military this world has ever seen.

God help us all.


+14 more 
posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 05:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

It is a FACT that in Michigan pollsters counted single Democrat ballots multiple times, i.e. fake votes.

That's just what we are absolutely sure of.



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 06:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5


The reality is that this # is still being posted on facebook.www.portlandmercury.com... Their is a problem insomuch as a "House divided will not stand"


+9 more 
posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 06:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5


Final tally shows Trump lost popular vote by 2.8 million – but he BEAT Clinton by 3 million votes outside of California and New York.

Clinton won California by 4.2 million votes and New York by 1.6 million, running up the score in places where she would have won no matter what.

Outside of those two liberal states, Trump was 3 million votes ahead.

California alone accounted for more than Clinton's national popular-vote edge.

Newt Gingrich mocked: 'This is football season. A team can have more yards and lose the game. What matters is how many points you put on the board'


Should 2 cities determine who is the President because that does not seem fair?

The Daily Fail - Straylia Edition



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 06:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: Rosinitiate

There's the rub.

So many fake votes and so much voter fraud in this election it's probable that if only real votes were counted she probably in actuality lost the popular vote as well.





What fake votes? Are you sourcing Alex Jones for this nonsense? As far as voter fraud goes, there were a few Trump supporters who were arrested for voting twice because they too believed crap they read online.


+3 more 
posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 06:00 PM
link   
And when it was all said and done, and even with the absurd MSM biased in the build up......


She came, she lost, we laughed........





If the DEM wanted to simply win they would have let Bernie run, this thread would not exist and Trump would be making millions in his business ventures, the agenda was totally different however and Hillary "had to be the person"...


RA



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 06:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: Rosinitiate
Sure they were real votes?


You boys need new material...

Reality and facts last...BS evaporates likes burps in the wind...


I'm a Democrat. Obama sent me a very nice Christmas card.

edit on 21-12-2016 by Rosinitiate because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 06:01 PM
link   
a reply to: abe froman

Gonna need a valid source on that, if you would be so kind.



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 06:02 PM
link   
Unlucky!!!

You know what you need to achieve from the outset, don't call foul play now!!

It was never going to be decided by the popular vote, the E.C is there for a reason, although, I have seen some tenuous claims as to why it should no longer exist.
edit on 21/12/16 by Cobaltic1978 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 06:02 PM
link   
Thanks for this.

I personally despise Hillary and sort of agree with the other "at least it's not Her" thread...

But you are right. Facts (should) reign supreme and like it or not , these stats are worth considering.

I would think even the most hardcore Trump fans could find some worthy fat to chew on here.. if being honest with oneself.

Funny that the "dead people" voting pops up also... ATS is a strange place these days.. UFO/metaphysical/ illuminati threads are automatically skunked but the walking dead are the most active voters . Lol



a reply to: Indigo5




posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 06:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

Considering our population continues to grow, it's pretty easy thing to continuously break... I'm sure there will be future candidates who lose with far larger amount of votes, I'm also sure if the loser happens to be trump or a republican, no one will care.

So, why should we care now?



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 06:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: EightAhoy

Yeah, spent more money, too. Makes the loss even more embarrassing, and scam-like.


I kind of view it as...HRC was a really bad candidate for the Dems to run...And Trump lost the popular vote to her by a literally historic margin. THAT is embarrassing.

Hell if his digital campaign manager Brad Parscale hadn't figured out how to Promise Coal Miners jobs in specific districts (that Trump will never give them) to flip states like PA etc. he never would have won.

HRC might have had more money...but Trump sure knew precisely who to lie to and what to say!



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 06:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: PsychoEmperor
a reply to: Indigo5

Considering our population continues to grow, it's pretty easy thing to continuously break...


Before Trump the electoral college and popular vote only split 4 other times in 250 years...

So...not sure what you are talking about?



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 06:07 PM
link   




edit on 121231America/ChicagoWed, 21 Dec 2016 18:12:26 -0600000000p3142 by interupt42 because: (no reason given)


+2 more 
posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 06:07 PM
link   
So basically you're saying you're fine with one state telling all the rest who to elect? That's where the majority of those votes came from. Legitimate or not, one state can not hold power over an entire nation. We see the results of that in Illinois all the time. The Democrats in Chicago call the shots for the whole state, doing what's best for Chicago, screw everything South of Cook County.



new topics

top topics



 
12
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join