It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

27 email chains containing classified information so they are above the law?

page: 1
24
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:
+3 more 
posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 01:42 PM
link   
FBI investigators noted that as part of a “criminal investigation” of Clinton, they discovered “27 email chains containing classified information” between Hillary and Huma Abedin. They needed to find out what Huma’s husband’s laptop contained because it “was never authorized for the storage or transmission of classified or national defense information,” and they needed “to determine if classified information was accessed by unauthorized users or transferred to any unauthorized systems.”

One attorney who examined the papers said this was “completely consistent” with what the FBI would want to do in a case like this.”

I suppose if you think it’s no big deal that Hillary and Huma exchanged “27 email chains containing classified information,” and that they might be floating around on yet another unsecured computer that regularly surfed sleazy websites, then yeah: why even bother to chase that down?

www.wsj.com... #lockherup




posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 01:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Stevemagegod

Yawn. Emails, yawn. This is also not twitter.


+5 more 
posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 01:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: Stevemagegod

Yawn. Emails, yawn. This is also not twitter.



its above top secret



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 01:50 PM
link   
Classified at the time for sure.

Huma in big trouble.



+1 more 
posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 01:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
Classified at the time for sure.

Huma in big trouble.



And Hillary. Huma shouldnt be the only won thrown under the bus


+4 more 
posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 01:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: Stevemagegod

Yawn. Emails, yawn. This is also not twitter.



Yawn?



(1) "Top Secret" shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security that the original classification authority is able to identify or describe.


Whitehouse.gov



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 02:13 PM
link   
For all we know it could be 27 email chains talking about US drone program articles in the media. Those would be public information but still top secret classified because the government is full of idiots. I remember when I was deployed when those articles hit the internet. We had orders from the Base Commander to not go to CNN, Fox News, and all the rest because we could be charged with unauthorized access to top secret information. It was ridiculous.



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 02:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle
For all we know it could be 27 email chains talking about US drone program articles in the media. Those would be public information but still top secret classified because the government is full of idiots. I remember when I was deployed when those articles hit the internet. We had orders from the Base Commander to not go to CNN, Fox News, and all the rest because we could be charged with unauthorized access to top secret information. It was ridiculous.


But those wouldn't be classified would they.




posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 02:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Pyle
For all we know it could be 27 email chains talking about US drone program articles in the media. Those would be public information but still top secret classified because the government is full of idiots. I remember when I was deployed when those articles hit the internet. We had orders from the Base Commander to not go to CNN, Fox News, and all the rest because we could be charged with unauthorized access to top secret information. It was ridiculous.


But those wouldn't be classified would they.





The would actually have been born classified and I don't think the drone programs have even been officially unclassified.



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 02:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle
For all we know it could be 27 email chains talking about US drone program articles in the media. Those would be public information but still top secret classified because the government is full of idiots. I remember when I was deployed when those articles hit the internet. We had orders from the Base Commander to not go to CNN, Fox News, and all the rest because we could be charged with unauthorized access to top secret information. It was ridiculous.


it must have been the Russians then to lol



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 02:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Stevemagegod

originally posted by: Pyle
For all we know it could be 27 email chains talking about US drone program articles in the media. Those would be public information but still top secret classified because the government is full of idiots. I remember when I was deployed when those articles hit the internet. We had orders from the Base Commander to not go to CNN, Fox News, and all the rest because we could be charged with unauthorized access to top secret information. It was ridiculous.


it must have been the Russians then to lol


I mean the Russians have a drone programs too but it would not be classified by the US government.



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 02:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle
For all we know it could be 27 email chains talking about US drone program articles in the media. Those would be public information but still top secret classified because the government is full of idiots. I remember when I was deployed when those articles hit the internet. We had orders from the Base Commander to not go to CNN, Fox News, and all the rest because we could be charged with unauthorized access to top secret information. It was ridiculous.


Well I had a Top Secret/SCI clearance and was a communications specialist on a submarine and the info I was read in on could start wars if leaked. So based on that and considering Hillary was way higher up the food chain and leaked compartmentalized info. I'd assume its not just useless info to our enemy's.



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 02:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: amicktd

Well I had a Top Secret/SCI clearance and was a communications specialist on a submarine and the info I was read in on could start wars if leaked. So based on that and considering Hillary was way higher up the food chain and leaked compartmentalized info. I'd assume its not just useless info to our enemy's.


Then you should know that not all Secret/Top Secret/SCI info really needs that classification. Hell some briefings I could get in trouble after them, if they wanted to be dicks about it, just by talking about weather or sunrise/sunset times because they were included in the briefing.



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 02:39 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

Seriously, do you even care? Dem 1st, it doesn't matter in the least to you? They really fegged up, you should give a damn.



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 02:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: Stevemagegod

Yawn. Emails, yawn. This is also not twitter.



Why do you say yawn?

Is it because its Hillary so its OK or you dont care about classified emails being on unsecure servers?

Ill preempt you saying "this is old news" by saying no its not, Hillary repeatedly said there was no classified material on those servers and the most Id heard was that there was 1 classified document.

If it was Trump who had been irresponsible with state secrets would it still be "yawn"?



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 03:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Stevemagegod

Hi Stevemagegod,

The massive amounts of leaks, spillage, and willful compromises of classified information, carried out by Hillary and her handlers, dwarfs the damage done by celebrity criminals Aldrich Ames, David Sheldon Boone, James Hall, Robert Hanssen, Ana Montes, Harold James Nicholson, Stewart Nozette, Ronald Pelton, Earl Edwin Pitts, Jonathan Pollard, George Trofimoff, and the Walker brothers.

The volumes of compromised classified information, leaked by Hillary, far exceeds the combined damage done by all incarcerated criminal spies.

And, even now, Hillary and her handlers remain way, way, way above the law.

Keywords for the leftist anti-American search engines: Treason, Espionage, Spillage, Felony



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 03:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: Stevemagegod

Yawn. Emails, yawn. This is also not twitter.



I'm under the firm belief that anyone who doesn't care about Hillary and her e-mails is perfectly ok with the concept that the rich and powerful can get away with all sorts of things we regular pleebs cannot.

If they do not believe that the rich and powerful should be allowed to get away with things we cannot, then why do they not care about Hillary and her negligent misuse of classified information??

We all know that if any of us were in her situation, we'd have been locked up for life, if not worse.
edit on 21-12-2016 by Necrobile because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 04:21 PM
link   

I'm under the firm belief that anyone who doesn't care about Hillary and her e-mails is perfectly ok with the concept that the rich and powerful can get away with all sorts of things we regular pleebs cannot.

If they do not believe that the rich and powerful should be allowed to get away with things we cannot, then why do they not care about Hillary and her negligent misuse of classified information??

We all know that if any of us were in her situation, we'd have been locked up for life, if not worse.

I had this exact discussion with a die-hard Hillary supporter yesterday, also a very close friend of mine. This is one of the few areas we disagree on ANY subject... Her stance is that Hillary's achievements far outweigh any damage that has been done. She also believes that the problem was only that Hillary was "not tech-savvy". REALLY? Are there not any guidelines or briefings given to someone that is going to be handling classified material? My friend also believes that having a private server was probably safer/wiser than an established US Government server. I dunno. If it were me, I'd rather have had my data stored on the US Government server, so in the event of a breach, I would most likely not have been held accountable.

There is no point in arguing with someone who worships HRC, so I don't (very often).
edit on 12212016 by seattlerat because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 04:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: seattlerat

I'm under the firm belief that anyone who doesn't care about Hillary and her e-mails is perfectly ok with the concept that the rich and powerful can get away with all sorts of things we regular pleebs cannot.

If they do not believe that the rich and powerful should be allowed to get away with things we cannot, then why do they not care about Hillary and her negligent misuse of classified information??

We all know that if any of us were in her situation, we'd have been locked up for life, if not worse.

I had this exact discussion with a die-hard Hillary supporter yesterday, also a very close friend of mine. This is one of the few areas we disagree on ANY subject... Her stance is that Hillary's achievements far outweigh any damage that has been done. She also believes that the problem was only that Hillary was "not tech-savvy". REALLY? Are there not any guidelines or briefings given to someone that is going to be handling classified material? My friend also believes that having a private server was probably safer/wiser than an established US Government server. I dunno. If it were me, I'd rather have had my data stored on the US Government server, so in the event of a breach, I would most likely not have been held accountable.

There is no point in arguing with someone who worships HRC, so I don't (very often).


Ha your friend sounds a lot like my grandmother. Total Hillary supporter.I asked Nani why hasn't Hillary given a press conference in 320 days? Her response was well she's a very private person. If you have been through what she has been through you'd be to. My response was no i wouldnt im running for President. When you speak to the Media your speaking to us the people. Trump hates the Media just as much as she does and he's out there every single day in the lion's den speaking to the reporters and his supporters.



posted on Dec, 21 2016 @ 04:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: amicktd

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: Stevemagegod

Yawn. Emails, yawn. This is also not twitter.



Yawn?



(1) "Top Secret" shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security that the original classification authority is able to identify or describe.


Whitehouse.gov



Yes unfortunately for America as a nation, that is the response of crooked Hillary supporters. Just "yawn" when criminal conduct is alleged or suspected or obvious. And when their cronies in key official positions such as law enforcement and federal prosecutors just ignore it they also think that is okay. Forget the rule of law, or even the insinuation of the rule of law with these kinds of people.



new topics

top topics



 
24
<<   2 >>

log in

join