It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
IBM employees are taking a public stand following a personal pitch to Donald Trump from CEO Ginni Rometty and the company’s initial refusal to rule out participating in the creation of a national Muslim registry.
In November, Rometty wrote Trump directly, congratulating him on his electoral victory and detailing various services the company could sell his administration. The letter was published on an internal IBM blog along with a personal note from Rometty to her enormous global staff. “As IBMers, we believe that innovation improves the human condition. … We support, tolerance, diversity, the development of expertise, and the open exchange of ideas,” she wrote in the context of lending material support to a man who won the election by rejecting all of those values.
The IBMPetition.org effort has been spearheaded in part by IBM cybersecurity engineer Daniel Hanley, who told The Intercept he started organizing with his coworkers after reading Rometty’s letter. “I was shocked, of course,” Hanley said, “because IBM has purported to espouse diversity and inclusion, and yet here’s Ginni Rometty in an unqualified way reaching out to an admin whose electoral success was based on racist programs.”
Taking a conservative approach has grave implications. Our own founder’s experience and the rest of history teach us that accommodating those who unleash forces of aggressive nationalism, bigotry, racism, fear, and exclusion inevitably yields devastating outcomes for millions of innocents.
But the IBM petition is perhaps the first of its kind, a rare instance of tech employees directly confronting their management in an industry where organized labor is unheard of. This may have something to do with the influence of former IBM employee Elizabeth Wood, who publicly quit the company shortly after reading Rometty’s letter. Wood, who provided advice and helped with drafts of the IBMPetition.org letter, told The Intercept that she quit because she found Trump’s “entire campaign repulsive,” and Rometty’s “willingness and eagerness to be involved made me think I want no part in this.”
originally posted by: eluryh22
a reply to: eisegesis
Meh. If I were running a company and I had employees that refused to perform their legal duties.... I'd replace them. It's really that simple.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: eisegesis
I give them credit for standing up for what they believe. Damn sure I wouldn't want to be part of such a thing.
I can only hope that Trump will back down on this issue.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: eluryh22
a reply to: eisegesis
Meh. If I were running a company and I had employees that refused to perform their legal duties.... I'd replace them. It's really that simple.
What duties are they legally obligated to perform?
The next day, all of us who signed the petition were called into a meeting where we thought our proposal would be discussed. Instead, we were informed that due to our “unprofessional” behavior, we were being let go from our internships. We were told to hand in our ID badges and to gather our things and leave the property ASAP.
.....you assumed you knew better.... .... A petition is well, it’s not something you typically see at work. It signals that you think that if you get enough signatures, your company will feel pressured to act, and that’s just not how this stuff works. A company is not going to change its dress code because its interns sign a petition.
originally posted by: eluryh22
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: eluryh22
a reply to: eisegesis
Meh. If I were running a company and I had employees that refused to perform their legal duties.... I'd replace them. It's really that simple.
What duties are they legally obligated to perform?
I don't know. You'd have to ask the employees that are refusing to do something it seems they haven't been asked to do.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: eluryh22
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: eluryh22
a reply to: eisegesis
Meh. If I were running a company and I had employees that refused to perform their legal duties.... I'd replace them. It's really that simple.
What duties are they legally obligated to perform?
I don't know. You'd have to ask the employees that are refusing to do something it seems they haven't been asked to do.
That would be grounds for termination through insubordination, but it has nothing to do with legal obligation.
originally posted by: Voiceofthemajority
a reply to: eisegesis
Alternate title for thread: How to use clickbait titling to make a topic look urgent
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: eluryh22
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: eluryh22
a reply to: eisegesis
Meh. If I were running a company and I had employees that refused to perform their legal duties.... I'd replace them. It's really that simple.
What duties are they legally obligated to perform?
I don't know. You'd have to ask the employees that are refusing to do something it seems they haven't been asked to do.
That would be grounds for termination through insubordination, but it has nothing to do with legal obligation.
originally posted by: eluryh22
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: eluryh22
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: eluryh22
a reply to: eisegesis
Meh. If I were running a company and I had employees that refused to perform their legal duties.... I'd replace them. It's really that simple.
What duties are they legally obligated to perform?
I don't know. You'd have to ask the employees that are refusing to do something it seems they haven't been asked to do.
That would be grounds for termination through insubordination, but it has nothing to do with legal obligation.
I had only mentioned "legal duties" because if an employee (or employees) are asked to do something they know is illegal, I would support their refusal to perform said duties. This, does not seem to be that.