It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

EC Voting Almost Over, Can We Talk About Russian Intervention Now?

page: 3
27
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:44 PM
link   
a reply to: drewlander


What? You want to talk about election fraud, right?


That's adorable! You think you're clever! I'll play along. Let's talk about the gerrymandering of the GOP that has been proven in a court of law. Perhaps we should talk about some other corruption among GOP election officials in NC who documented their voter suppression efforts? How about the multiple instances of GOP led purges of voting rolls, colluding with state police in states to thwart voting registration efforts?

I mean, you do care that US citizens are being disenfranchised right? No, you don't because nobody told you to care.


I am convinced democrats tried to throw the election by encouraging undocumented citizens from Mexico to fraudulently vote in the election. Its a real claim that can be substantiated,


Substantiate it then? Are you looking for permission from me to proceed? Lmao.


You put Mexicans above Russians when it comes to election fraud -- sounds racist to me. Are you a racist?


That's going to need some work but good effort.




posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Arizonaguy
a reply to: ColdWisdom

Absolutely none. His half-baked attempts to try to create a left-wing narrative under the guise of non-partisan common sense are pathetic.


Yep.

Seems like they forgot all about 'Peregruzka' back in 2009.

That Russian reset. They pushed not so long ago.

Now the left is manufacturing a new villain after losing the election.

So much for being more flexible.

www.reuters.com...

Now they are 'collectively' outright trying to start a war with Russia.

edit on 19-12-2016 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Natas0114
Wikileaks leader Julian assange said himself "it did not come from the russians". Why is this so hard to digest?


And if they did, Julian Assange would admit it?
Is that what you're suggesting?

Ludicrous.



posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Natas0114

They must need to take a digestive enzyme, perhaps a political probiotic?



posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:46 PM
link   

news flash from Pravda....








posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:47 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueJacket

Anal - ease. Kills the butt-hurt. Lol



posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408


Yes they're some of the most well written this site has to offer.


Which ones? The 100 of them with 'Trump' in the title or his paranormal reader's digest?



posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408

The problem is, the CIA and FBI haven't earned any more trust or confidence than Assange and Russia.


edit on 19-12-2016 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Natas0114
Wikileaks leader Julian assange said himself "it did not come from the russians". Why is this so hard to digest?


Because it doesn't agree with the narrative that needs to be pushed. Ergo, it gets ignored.



posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408

Ludicrous is not accepting reality. If any of you had definitive proof instead of MSM hogwash i would accept it. But you have nothing, which is why I laugh. The very source of all the leaks that were used to alter the election tells you.where its from and you can't handle it. Not my problem.
edit on 12192016 by Natas0114 because: Typo



posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:52 PM
link   
Racists, Russians, Comey, Fake News, Deplorables, Inner-city voters, Huma...Who will Leftists blame besides Hillary next?



posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Natas0114

You're under the assumption that I give a toss who won this clusterf*ck.

Hint: I didn't want Hillary.


Secondly, I care about National Security.
That's the be all and end all.

Leaks?

I'm talking to someone who is in stage 1.
What a waste of time asking you a genuine question was.



posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:54 PM
link   
Why do you lefties want a world war? Who cares if they tried to influence our election? We literally pay and arm the terrorists that kill Russians in Syria.


Gin

posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:54 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT




posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:55 PM
link   
UPDATE: Hillary lost 7...and counting.



posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

If only it really was Sparta...... it would be so much easier to just toss defective people off a cliff.



posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:55 PM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom

I enjoy his non-political posts, but that was pretty funny!




posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408

I also care about national security. Enough to the point of actually being part of it. Marines, 4 tours, top secret security clearance. Class 3 FFL. You? Let me guess, no active duty service....
edit on 12192016 by Natas0114 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 04:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: avgguy
Why do you lefties want a world war? Who cares if they tried to influence our election? We literally pay and arm the terrorists that kill Russians in Syria.


Lol you guys detailed this thread real quick.

Delusional. Lefties want a world war?

The righties want a totalitarian dictator.

In la-la-la land, opinion = fact.



posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 05:01 PM
link   
a reply to: RomeByFire




Lefties want a world war?


Yeah today it's Russia.

Tomorrow it's beating other people in to submission in to accepting the everlasting life of the church of climatology.




top topics



 
27
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join