posted on Dec, 19 2016 @ 03:13 PM
Once upon a time this site used facts and evidence to try and find answers when things didn't quite add up - like aliens and the Illuminati. Now it
uses party rhetoric and ad hominem attacks to try find out whose opinion is the "righterest". A site dedicated to "denying ignorance" has lately
shown a stunning lack of such denial and - more importantly - a stunning abundance of logical fallacies.
Licorice ice cream tastes bad. Therefore, chocolate ice cream tastes good.
Read that slowly, as many times as it takes for it to sink into your thick monkey cranium. Does that statement make any sense at all?
No. No it doesn't. This is called a logical fallacy. Just because one thing is bad does not mean another thing is good. And furthermore, bad and good
are OPINIONS, not facts.
Now stick with me for just a moment, because I'm really going to blow the lid off of your whole world.
Hillary Clinton is corrupt. Therefore Donald Trump is the second coming of Jesus and cannot be corrupted.
Did you spot the logical fallacy? Just because Hillary Clinton was the most corrupt candidate ever put forth as a presidential candidate (And this
really is quite indisputible. Sorry.) does not mean that Donald Trump is incorruptible. This is a logical fallacy. And before the republicans get
their guns and pitch forks, this logic flows BOTH WAYS. Hillary Clinton was NOT a good candidate just because Donald Trump is demonstrably unqualified
for the job.
STOP ARGUING OPINIONS USING FLAWED LOGIC. Get off whichever party's D*** you're currently riding and go back to discussing facts, figures,
and Bob Lazar. This concludes today' rant. If you have any further questions, please refer to the FAQ below.
Q: Help, I didn't understand this post!
A: This is not a question. Also, that means you're dumb**. Sorry.
Q: Hey wait a second, I support Donald Trump and that means Hillary Clinton is a corrupt idiot who needs to be in jail!
A: Also not a question. Also, you clearly didn't understand this post. Please see question 1.
Q: Donald Trump is a buffoon and is not qualified for the presidency. Hillary Clinton was the superior choice.
A: Still not a question. Also, you clearly didn't understand this post. Please see question 1.
Q: Why do you have to use naughty words and be mean?
A: Because this is a rant and because I like naughty words.
Q: Your post offended me!
A: Good. Then you're probably one of the idiots I'm talking about. Also, this wasn't a question either.
Q: If I'm so dumb how come you had a spelling mistake, comma splice, or other grammatical error?
A: To lure you into a false sense of security and so the trolls will have something to snack on.
Q: We're not here to discuss what YOU want to discuss!
A: Not a qu- ah screw it. I don't care what you discuss. I just want you discuss whatever you choose to discuss LOGICALLY. The recent onslaught of
drivel has threatened to give me a brain tumor.
Q: How much longer is this FAQ going to be? Do you really think people will read this far?
A: I'm done.
**"Dumb" as used in this post can be defined as:
"lacking intelligence or good judgment; stupid; dull-witted."