It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Allodial title constitutes ownership of real property (land, buildings and fixtures) that is independent of any superior landlord. Allodial title is related to the concept of land held "in allodium", or land ownership by occupancy and defense of the land. Historically, much of land was uninhabited and could therefore be held "in allodium".[1] In the modern developed world, true allodial title is only possible for nation state governments.[1] Although the word "allodial" has been used in the context of private ownership in a few states of the United States, this ownership is still restricted by governmental authority; the word 'allodial' in these cases describes land with fewer but still significant governmental restrictions. en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: underwerks
This is just me thinking out loud. What would be wrong with optional big government?
The infrastructure and the ability to help would be there, but you could choose with your tax dollars what to opt in to. You would still pay the going tax rate (hopefully lower though) but choose what your tax dollars go to.
Don't support a planned use for your tax dollars? Don't check that box on your tax forms when you fill them out.
I understand the need to sometimes legislate equality, such as civil rights in the 50's and 60's, and women and gay rights today. It seems that would have to be agreed on before we could institute something like this. I have faith there'd be enough rich benefactors to keep things like planned parenthood in business.
I'm not saying this is what we need to do or that this is even a good plan, I'm just wondering about everyone's ideas on it. Good or bad.
What do you think?
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: underwerks
This is just me thinking out loud. What would be wrong with optional big government?
The infrastructure and the ability to help would be there, but you could choose with your tax dollars what to opt in to. You would still pay the going tax rate (hopefully lower though) but choose what your tax dollars go to.
Don't support a planned use for your tax dollars? Don't check that box on your tax forms when you fill them out.
I understand the need to sometimes legislate equality, such as civil rights in the 50's and 60's, and women and gay rights today. It seems that would have to be agreed on before we could institute something like this. I have faith there'd be enough rich benefactors to keep things like planned parenthood in business.
I'm not saying this is what we need to do or that this is even a good plan, I'm just wondering about everyone's ideas on it. Good or bad.
What do you think?
The problem with this type of system, is that people check the boxes that are most like them. The people who need food stamps for example, pay very little in taxes (certainly not enough to fund the program). How does a program they need ever get funded when those with the money would rather vote for subsidies for their industries? Outside of the farm lobby, few wealthy people would check that box. The same goes for rental assistance, or disability coverage, or any other sort of safety net program. People will only fund the ones helping them at that moment, but those types of programs require others to assist.
In short, the needy never have the advocates they need, when things are voluntary.