It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by edsinger
a conflict likened by one historian to a pack of feral canines at each other's throats.[...]
information that points to the existence of the Bible's vilified Kingdom of Edom at precisely the time the Bible says it existed, and contradicting widespread academic belief that it did not come into being until 200 years later.
Their findings mean that those scholars convinced that the Hebrew Old Testament is at best a compendium of revisionist, fragmented history, mixed with folklore and theology, and at worst a piece of outright propaganda, likely will have to apply the brakes to their thinking.
It is the historical accuracy -- the very existence of this united kingdom and the might and splendour of David and Solomon, as well as the existence of surrounding kingdoms -- that lies at the heart of the archeological dispute
Originally posted by Nygdan
What? that much of a controversy because of a200 year difference in chronology?
Originally posted by JJ McKool
Just to point out, men inspired by God wrote the bible, God did not directly influence the bible. When something in the bible is a little inaccurate, that doesn't mean our beliefs are a sham, just means that the people who wrote it may have been misinformed or might have exaggerated or whatnot.
This is an interesting find though, thanks for relaying the info.
Originally posted by marg6043
Ed nobody disregard the bible as completly lies and myths but is a mix of both, it does have historical importance. After all it is the history of the Jewish people up to the new testament.
So the cities in the bible many did existed but they were destroyed through the years and many still can be found.
Also is other ancient historical writings by other than the bible scripts that also talks about ancient sites and cities of the time what they don't talk is about the names of the jewish lineage like the bible does.
Originally posted by marg6043
OK people I am talking about real history not miracles of the bible on that I am not a believer.
So have fun on your religious self discovery I got plenty of links on the "realities of the time."
Originally posted by Seapeople
Yeah, it is a wonder ed. I mean, honestly, why wouldn't a science or history student go to the bible first. I mean, how else would we have known someone walked on water, or split a sea into two. Where else does someone rise from the dead....
I just can't figure it out either, why those silly scientists don't go there for there answers...
Oh yeah, I forgot, they have brains.
Really? precisely that time in the 1100 BCE years? Excellent.
Yet by coincidence, Prof. Adams of Hamilton's McMaster University says, he and an international team of colleagues fit into place a significant piece of the puzzle of human history in the Middle East -- unearthing information that points to the existence of the Bible's vilified Kingdom of Edom at precisely the time the Bible says it existed, and contradicting widespread academic belief that it did not come into being until 200 years later.
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween
But how wonderful this news anyway, the more they find the we get to probvin Jews were Egyptians.
Originally posted by edsinger
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween
But how wonderful this news anyway, the more they find the we get to probvin Jews were Egyptians.
How in the heck do you come up with that?
Easy, through a lot of research, some of which is on this forum. In short form for you, Jews were Egyptians, and the above poster is corect the Thutmoses kings are linked to Jewish characters, such as the obvious Moses. Aten was the God they revered, the one-God transition in Egyptian history. The Book of Genesis is a recounting of the Egyptian myths but changed slightly to make God become men, to re-invent all of the first human Egyptians myths, etc.
Originally posted by edsinger
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween
But how wonderful this news anyway, the more they find the we get to probvin Jews were Egyptians.
How in the heck do you come up with that?
Several artefacts were found in association with later contexts which, although probably residual, corroborate the early Iron Age (c. 1200 –1000 BC) date of the first occupation. For example, a leaf-shaped metal arrowhead (B. 7559, L. 344) in Stratum S3, and two scarabs
from Strata 1 and 2a in Room 4 of the Area S building are especially significant. The partially broken ‘walking sphinx’ scarab (Figure 5.1) originally included the now headless body of a royal sphinx on top of a nb sign that served as an exergue, and apparently a hieroglyph that is
now lost. The closest parallels (Hall 1913; Matouk 1977) nos. 104, 342 [No. 485], 384 [No.587]) have been dated to the New Kingdom and could therefore fit with the first half of the twelfth century BC. The second scarab (Figure 5.2) belongs to a well-known abbreviated sub-group of Iron I scarabs with a chariot scene. It depicts an archer, a horse with raised tail,
a crouching horned animal, and another human figure.
If this site can be equated with the rise of the Biblical kingdom of Edom it can now be seen to: have its roots in local Iron Age societies; is considerably earlier than previous scholars assumed; (SORRY ED!) and proves that complex societies existed in Edom long before the influence of Assyrian imperialism was felt in the region from the eighth – sixth centuries BC.
The archaeology of the Iron Age (c. 1200 – 586 BC) in the southern Levant (Israel, the Palestinian territories, Jordan and adjacent areas) has been fraught with controversy ever since its nineteenth century beginnings primarily because it is linked with issues concerning the historicity of the Old Testament or Hebrew Bible. Dating events and processes of change
during the “Biblical” or Iron Age periods has been particularly problematic.
In this paper, we present the recent excavation results from a major stratified Iron Age Edomite lowland site that demonstrate significant settlement and copper production activities well before the seventh and sixth centuries BC based on high precision radiocarbon dates. These dates demonstrate a much earlier Iron Age occupation in Edom dating to the twelfth to ninth centuries BC, when construction of massive fortifications and industrial scale metal
production activities took place. Due to the relatively small number of new dates published here (ten) our report does not attempt to link the new radiocarbon data with specific historical events or personages. However, given the current debate concerning radiocarbon dating and the Iron Age of the southern Levant (Holden 2003), it is clear that the new data presented here demonstrate that a complex Iron Age polity existed in the Edomite lowlands much earlier than previously assumed.