It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-BREAKING- FBI backs CIA view that Russia intervened to help Trump win

page: 6
93
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: stosh64

Get over it already, Trump will be sworn in Jan. 20th.


If, by some chance, this is deemed an unfair, crooked election because of Putin. And the Electoral College chooses Hillary.

I expect you too accept it and get over it.


Sure but that will never ever happen.




posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:40 PM
link   
The only people trying to subvert the electoral process are those who are calling on the Electoral College to violate their Constitutional duty to officially elect Trump.

Frankly, I could care less what the crybaby celebrities in that video think the EC should do. Calling them heroes if they violate our founding document is outrageous and proof that they themselves have no respect for it.

It should also be a big, red flag that they deserve absolutely no respect or loyalty from Americans. There is a reason actors and other performance types used to be at the bottom of the food chain. They play for a living.

The rest of us have to have actual skills and/or an education.

Stop letting these morons dupe you. Think for yourself.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:41 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

Never mind all that, the left have been actively threatening the EC folks despite all the screeching they were doing before the election about it being illegal for patriots to loom at the polls and make sure no funny business was going on.

Electoral College death threats won’t be the last bid to overturn the election
edit on 16-12-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:42 PM
link   
This is just funny. Here for months and years the left has said,

1. The CIA is a bunch of bad guys. They start wars, sell drugs, and eat babies.
2. The FBI is against the people. Comey killed Hillary. He cost her the election.

And now.......

3. The FBI and the CIA said the Russians hacked the DNC
4. They must be right!!!!!

An IF the Russians did it, what did they do?

5. They hacked the DNC!!!!

How did they do it?

6. An elementary social engineering phishing email that Podesta fell for and any grandmother wouldn't. I get at least one of those every day.

And what was exposed?

7. REAL DNC Emails. They weren't fake.

I say give the Russians a medal.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:42 PM
link   



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Aliensun
a reply to: Joneselius

Unless they can prove that the actual ballot counts were a result of Russian activities, then they don't have a snowball in Hell's chance of making any changes in the result. It is all about every possible way to delegitimize Trump.



Attor ney General Lynch: No ‘Technical Interference’ From Russia During The Election



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: projectvxn


Try understanding how and why the EC works.


The cognitive dissonance is strong with you. You couldn't be more behind the EC as long as it's getting Trump elected but you completely fail to understand/acknowledge another legitimate and intended function of the EC.

Then there's this bulls# that people on the political left want to destroy everything and kill everyone (because you say so apparently) but then you admit that if the EC doesn't elect Trump, your wingnut peers will start killing people and destroying things.

What's really interesting about your thinking on this is how on some level, you realize that the EC electing Clinton would actually be legitimate or you obviously wouldn't be worried about it. In other words, you know very well that enough electors vote for Clinton, in keeping with the laws of the United States of America, she'll be legitimately elected President. If that wasn't the case, you wouldn't be worried.

So actually, it's the constant threat of violence from assholes that threatens to undermine the legitimate election process of our republic.


No the EC is suppossed to reflect the STATES WILL. The majority of states were RED/rep. If they give it to Clinton it will not be doing its job. And they would also put themselves on a hit list.


^^^^^
THIS.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: everyone

originally posted by: Xcathdra
I dont know whats more hilarious... The article itself or the 7000 + comments bellow the article picking it apart and calling it fake news.


Good to know and thanks for posting that.

Not sure if i still need to ask this but, Where is the source where the FBI says all of this?


There is not one. The FBI / CIA refused to comment for the article, which is a red flag. Secondly the article holds positions that Obama settled in his press conference. 3rd the FBI / DOJ already stated there is no evidence Russia tried to tip the election in favor of Trump. They also stated there is no links between Trump and Putin.

The Washington compost seems to be just making # up now.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:46 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

How scientific of you. With a picture and everything. The fact of the matter is you can no more claim that there was no effect of the hacks (funny you keep ignoring the Podesta hack completely too) then anyone else could claim to know how much effect the leaks had.

It's unknowable.

It could even be that for every voter swayed to vote for Trump by something stupid like the "CLINTON HATES CATHOLICS IT WAS IN THE EMAILS!*!@&!" dumbassery that Dear Leaer promoted (because he's an effin geyser of disinfo), there was a person who was just as inspired to vote for Clinton because foreign actors were attempting to influence the election.

I think we can all agree that there was SOME effect though and more importantly there was an INTENT. An intent by the hackers. An intent by Julian Assange in his 30+ day campaign of releasing John Podesta emails right up to the election.

Donald Trump is going to be elected by the EC, don't worry. Hopefully he's not as forcefully ignorant as he counts on his cult being. Otherwise, we're really and truly f'd.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:49 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

You have evidence of Russia doing the Podesta hack? Surprised you'd sit on such a bombshell. Maybe you can get on CNN with it.


Meanwhile, the DNC Hack was released the week before the DNC Convention. Look at the graph, her poll ratings actually went up following it, not the other way around. LA Times ended up being the most accurate poll, no?

If you'd like to pull up the "Catholic Spring" emails for us, that'd be fantabulous!!!

edit on 16-12-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)

edit on 16-12-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:49 PM
link   


Show me ONE proof that this happened, one


I will take the word of the FBI and CIA over any anonymous poster on the internet. Especially considering that for the entire modern history of Russia they've had a huge intelligence system that is constantly spying on us like we spy on them.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:51 PM
link   
This is also a good one. in nevada, 2000 people voted in the last 2 days yet democrats received 3000 votes in that time.


edit on America/ChicagovAmerica/ChicagoFri, 16 Dec 2016 20:52:27 -060016201612America/Chicago by everyone because: (no reason given)


(post by Restricted removed for a manners violation)

posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Joneselius


You not on crazy pills, the fact always was that Hillary cant afford to loose. Its not even about Hillary or Bill for that matter, they are just people that were compromised years ago. We just happened to find out with a high degree of probability , how and why they were compromised. Blair as well and all the rest for that matter. I doubt that the death rate that surrounds them has much to do with them either. Its all a #ing mess.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:55 PM
link   
"James Clapper NO strong evidence on Russian hacks "






edit on America/ChicagovAmerica/ChicagoFri, 16 Dec 2016 20:56:15 -060016201612America/Chicago by everyone because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 09:05 PM
link   
a reply to: yuppa

How far into your colon do you have to reach to find these non-facts?


The majority of states where red/rep


You do realize that the number of electors a state has is equal to the number of apportioned Representatives in the House + two for the Senators right? It's only the Senate where states have equal representation. This is basic civics. The EC has absolutely nothing to do with "the majority of states."


No the EC is suppossed to reflect the STATES WILL.


Wrong again. The EC has essentially two functions. To act as a buffer and to keep low population states from being rendered irrelevant when selecting the President by artificially boosting their influence. As to the first, rather than just saying things based on your feelings, perhaps you should read what James Madison had to say about it in Federalist #10.


And they would also put themselves on a hit list.


Oh boy. Where is DBC or one of the other people who have been ranting about how any elector who flipped was probably responding to death threats because you're pretty much stating that there's an implied risk of assassination at the hand of civics-ignorant wingnuts if the electors try to perform a legitimate function of the EC.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 09:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Restricted


^^^^^
THIS.


Is wrong.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 09:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Restricted


^^^^^
THIS.


Is wrong.

Oh, so the majority of states weren't red, then?



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 09:11 PM
link   



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 09:13 PM
link   
a reply to: everyone

Which garners the question why they are willing to say this happened without the proof.

If it's because it's "classified" I fail to understand. They let the secret out, doing such will have all the same ramifications as providing the evidence.







 
93
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join