It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Brilliant Light Power Achieves Self-Sustaining Reaction

page: 8
14
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 17 2017 @ 06:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Bedlam


It's not an over unity device, because it burns hydrogen.




posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 05:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: ErosA433



You've just told me it all come from the Big Bang ..which is Magic. Thanks.



It's becoming clearer why you fall for such scams.



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 06:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: ErosA433

You've just told me it all come from the Big Bang ..which is Magic. Thanks.



Not magic at all, not knowing the origin of something because it represents kind of t=0 as far as this reality works (even though it might not be) doesn't mean that it is magic. Plus that model predicts so many things that we see around us, so to simply throw it out with such a simple minded notion is... well it should be embarrassing, that or you are simply trolling.

So, big bang is magic? well why don't you believe that magic? when you seem to believe BLPs magic device. Even you have said it has an infinite source (if memory of your posts serves correctly)



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 03:49 PM
link   
a reply to: ErosA433
The only thing Mills is getting wrong is the timing , I don't think it will be ready for about five years. Its had about a hundred peer reviews. So we will see who ultimately has egg on their face.



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 04:07 PM
link   
a reply to: anonentity

please cite the most important 3 - of your alledged " 100 peer reviews "



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 04:16 PM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape


its in the last vid I posted. I mean he gives a demonstration of the thing working, and no believes what they see, because the Dogma says it wont work?. Your saying because his theory of physics doesn't quite fit with the accepted dogma he is working a fraud, a respected scientist, who has wasted years of his life, and decided a criminal venture is the way to go?. Bumblebees shouldn't fly but they do.



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 04:42 PM
link   
a reply to: anonentity

YouTube videos aren't peer reviews (and your video doesn't work lol).

Please back up your (false) claim of his nonesense being peer reviewed, by supplying links to the actual peer reviews.

BTW, linking to any review on his site or any site affiliated with his bs isn't going to cut it.
edit on 1832017 by TerryDon79 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 04:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: anonentity


a reply to: ErosA433
The only thing Mills is getting wrong is the timing , I don't think it will be ready for about five years. Its had about a hundred peer reviews. So we will see who ultimately has egg on their face.



As opposed to the already 25 years and OVER $100 MILLION in scam....I mean....."investment"?

I see you're another "it'll be ready soon" (or the same one).

It's because of people like you that he and his company (and all previous incarnations of) have managed to scam so much money from people in the 25 years he's been doing it.
edit on 1832017 by TerryDon79 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 04:58 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79



www.brettholverstott.com... have a read of this...It might put a chink in your armour....



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 05:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: TerryDon79



www.brettholverstott.com... have a read of this...It might put a chink in your armour....



Did you not read the part where I said, and I quote...

BTW, linking to any review on his site or any site affiliated with his bs isn't going to cut it.


I'm guessing you didn't because you linked to someone DIRECTLY linked to Mills! Well done!

If you're going to say that he isn't, well, click the About part and you'll (unsurprisingly) see this....


His first book, Randell Mills and the Search for Hydrino Energy is a hybrid work of science journalism, exposition, memoir, and philosophy of science. He lectures regularly on topics related to the book.



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 05:40 PM
link   
a reply to: anonentity

Exactly as TerryDon79 said... Brett Holverstott is on the books... he is going to support Mills because he has helped him form the myth and he personally profits from it in the form of books and lectures to investors.

How about these then

goodmath.scientopia.org...
A blog page...which you might say 'no credibility' but hell its more scientifically literate and logical than your post was

www.esa.int...
ESA examination of the theory and publications...


iopscience.iop.org...
Comment basically pulling apart some of mill's measurements of Vacuum UV photons...

I could find some more but, with the way you have argued and discussed the science... i doubt very much you would understand much of it. Don't mean to be condescending but an eye for an eye.



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 05:44 PM
link   
a reply to: ErosA433


How about a sceptical engineer from ABM who checks it out and joins the "scam" The thing works www.youtube.com...



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 05:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: ErosA433


How about a sceptical engineer from ABM who checks it out and joins the "scam" The thing works www.youtube.com...



Have you got ANYTHING apart from something from YouTube or someone directly linked to Mills?

If it's so great, there must be something, right?



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 06:13 PM
link   
a reply to: anonentity

Iv seen this video before, it is an awful presentation, almost nothing is explained, and what is said is profoundly incorrect. yet these statements made are not given any treatment at all. Not only that but the claim that hydrinos can be dark matter is just so logically inconsistent i don't even know where to start.

Know what happens when you pass extremely high current through a conductive substance? It creates plasma... can you start a reaction with that plasma - probably - Is what he is claiming, true, that by adding energy to create plasma you can magically get energy back out because you some how drop the hydrogen into lower energy states? well doubt full.

Does the presentation show nay actual numbers? No again you have to take his word for it.

- Status -

A sceptical engineer from ABM...

is that relevant?

Im a sceptical Physicist - particle physicist to be exact... I am unconvinced... that should totally overwrite the above statement by your own logic

There are also engineers who don't understand temperature dependant yield strength or the fact that when you bend things you create heat... an Engineer isn't someone who automatically right in everything they say. Last Engineer i spoke to hadn't got a clue about nuclear or atomic physics.... so? they are authorities on the subject now?

hmmmmm
edit on 18-3-2017 by ErosA433 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 07:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: ErosA433
a reply to: anonentity
Not only that but the claim that hydrinos can be dark matter is just so logically inconsistent i don't even know where to start.


"Dark matter" is the new go-to for unexplainable energy yields amongst the 'alternative energy' community. Vacuum energy and zero-point energy are so 90's, you know.
edit on 18-3-2017 by Bedlam because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 07:57 PM
link   
a reply to: ErosA433


Well the apparatus is simple enough, you pour molten silver in the bottom reservoir , a couple of magnets cause the silver to turn, in an Archimedes screw due to the Lorenz force, this acts as a pump, it comes out of the Tungsten electrodes, a couple of capacitors ark the metal, a few times, then it goes incandescent in a self sustaining burn, the molten metal drops back into the silver reservoir to be used continuously. All in a vapour of water where the hydrogen gets split from the water molecule.

Silver is the best metal as its photon output light is the same as the suns radiation , and the most useful to the encapsulating PV cells. The argument is that Mills is Bull#ting the results, or is living in a deluded state. If it works and more energy comes out than is put in, their is only one way to bull# it. Which is to keep using the starter battery to keep the arc going, until its depleated.Because you can actually use a twelve volt car battery to weld with. Silver being the best heat conductor would stay molten in the reservoir, once the arc was going, just thinking how to use the system with all the right bells and whistles has taken years to get to this stage. With millions of dollars of investment. All the time getting bullied by fellow scientist saying , it wont work because their is no ground state of Hydrogen, well there either is or there isn't. But one things for sure, if you follow the heard nothing will get invented.



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 08:12 PM
link   
a reply to: anonentity

I would just like to highlight something you typed that I actually laughed at.


you pour molten silver in the bottom reservoir , a couple of magnets cause the silver to turn, in an Archimedes screw due to the Lorenz force


Um. All I have to say to that is LOL.

ETA: Thought I should explain why I'm LOLing.

Lorentz force

the force which is exerted by a magnetic field on a moving electric charge.

Silver is paramagnetic and only has a weak magnetic effect.

Again, LOL.
edit on 1832017 by TerryDon79 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 08:50 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79


Nah the Lorenz force will turn a nail, on a battery without much trouble. The eddy currents on silver are very high, in fact that's one of the ways to test if it is silver, if you have a plate of silver and a plate of brass, incline them at 45 degrees, and let a Moly, magnet slide down them, it takes ages for the one on the silver to reach the bottom.

The original motor used mercury en.wikipedia.org...




edit on 18-3-2017 by anonentity because: (no reason given)

edit on 18-3-2017 by anonentity because: (no reason given)

edit on 18-3-2017 by anonentity because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 09:39 PM
link   
a reply to: anonentity

You're on about electrical fields now. It's still all bs.

For you to keep silver in liquid form, it needs to be heated to at least 961C. I'm afraid, at that temperature, the water it would drop into would just evaporate rendering it useless.

And I see you post yet another bunk link to a, this time, open access site where anyone can post anything?

Still waiting on some of those "100 peer reviewed papers" you said exist LOL.

ETA: I see you deleted THIS LINK. Was that because you realised it wasn't useful?
edit on 1832017 by TerryDon79 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 18 2017 @ 09:45 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79


Ok this guy checked out BLP he was paid for by a consulting firm, and gave it the thumbs up.www.bucknell.edu... He said it produced excess power......Mills might have got the theory wrong Hydrinos either exist or don't or whatever. But if the thing works it works.


And he replicated it at Rowan pesn.com...

So I can see a lot of people saying its a scam, when in fact it might not be. But I would think that just about every body in the energy business hopes it is a scam.


edit on 18-3-2017 by anonentity because: (no reason given)

edit on 18-3-2017 by anonentity because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
14
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join