It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why I Agree with the Georgia Guidestones to a NWO and You Should Too!

page: 7
99
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 05:05 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

My quote of the day:
"No point in living in a utopia if we have to sacrifice our humanity to achieve such." Wonderfully put.




posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 05:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko

Do you forcibly sterilize them? (I know Annee spoke out in favor of stopping unwise breeding but also wants equal rights to include the control of her "woman bits." Seems to me those two goals are mutually exclusive.).


No no no.

They were separate paragraphs and thought on purpose

Practical sustainability. Irresponsible breeding affects the entire globe and natural resources. It takes resources from others.

Legislating a woman's body mostly because of religious belief - - - is not about practical sustainability. (I intentionally did not elaborate because the "A" word tends to derail threads).



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 05:10 PM
link   
I agree with them all except for number 1 and 2 really is a continuation of 1.

There is more than enough resources and space on this planet for billions of more humans if we just manage our resources properly.

Think of this:

There is so much water on our planet that we will never run out...ever. Part two of this statement is that there is more than enough money to build thousands of desalinization plants to harvest the oceans water for our every day needs.

There is more than enough power, if we build more wind and solar installations.

We would then transition all transportation to electric and our pollution would disappear.

And so on and so on. overpopulation and lack of resources is the biggest myth of our modern age.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 05:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

So then how could the goal of responsible breeding be accomplished? Without legislating it. Without any laws.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 05:11 PM
link   
a reply to: jjsr420

The reasonable answer seems to be simply change the Human paradigm, achieving such through, now that would be a thing indeed.

edit on 16-12-2016 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 05:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
No point living in a utopia if we have to sacrifice our Humanity to achieve such.


"One man's Utopia . . . . "

Humanity? I don't consider starvation from lack of food humanity.

Polluted water. Oh wait, we're already there with that one.

Polluted ocean. Yep, already there.

Destruction of the rain forest and animal habitats for human appropriation.

This Utopia? The one we're currently in?



edit on 16-12-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 05:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

And not legislating abortion is actually something we agree on. More government overreach into personal (private) lives. Just curious how you see it working without any laws in place.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 05:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

A claim of currently living in a utopia wasn't made. You're arguing a point that was not claimed.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 05:14 PM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash


Also anything related to this you'd like to bring up you are more than welcome. Thanks!


The "Manual" adds more to this if you haven't checked it out already.


"Common Sense Renewed (Georgia Guidestones "Manual")"
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 05:21 PM
link   
a reply to: dreamingawake

Thanks.

It's been a long time since I've read up on and listened to guests on C2C discuss the Georgia Guidelstones.

Life changes. Had to put my "toys" away for a few years


edit on 16-12-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 05:23 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake




No point living in a utopia if we have to sacrifice our Humanity to achieve such.


exactly why their not Rosy Cross

guide stones are not Rosy Cross
they benefit another group
and
"their" plan for paradise

R.C Christian
the real one Johann
would be ashamed



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 05:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Suppose one Man's idea of Utopia is another Man's idea of hell.

Just depends on where you are standing or on which side of the fence you find yourself born into really. Im not saying people cannot change there station in life, just that life for a significant percentage of the people on the planet is hardly fair.

We would not need to consider population control if we were to get off our arses and start colonizing low earth orbit, the Moon, Mars and then on to the rest of the outer planets and moons, eventually even venturing on to another star system.

Sure its a technological challenge but if Humanity is to survive the next few thousand years its something we actually have to do because the fact is that one little marble just wont meet our requirements.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 05:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: amazing

There is more than enough resources and space on this planet for billions of more humans if we just manage our resources properly.



Have you read up on the polluted oceans lately?

Do you expect cooperative volunteers to adhere to strict regulations?



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 05:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake

Suppose one Man's idea of Utopia is another Man's idea of hell.


I think that was kind of MY point.


We would not need to consider population control if we were to get off our arses and start colonizing low earth orbit, the Moon, Mars and then on to the rest of the outer planets and moons, eventually even venturing on to another star system.


I'm a long time supporter of moving off planet.

Don't see it happening in my lifetime. How much longer is earth sustainable at current growth rate?



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 05:35 PM
link   
A couple of points:

One is that we have come to realize that humans are ruled by negative archetypes and positive archetypes.

When there is an eruption of the negative archetypes some insightful people can see it coming.

So we have repetitive and constant eruptions of these inner negative archetypes

Therefore it seems to me that will always be the case until these negative archetypes are resolves within the human spirit

They’ve been with us since the beginning. When the negative ones get out of hand, we have a Hitler, Stalin, Crusades, an ISIS, Ghenges Khan, etc…
..
This always brings forth some of the positive archetypes to oppose such rumblings of the human experience and usually the evil gets defeated or worn out or absorbed, though not before causing untold suffering to many human beings.

That’s the message of the DIA pictures somewhat.

These negative archetypes can cause the destruction of the world( oh my God particularly in a nuclear age) and that is the basis of the scriptural, Quran and Biblical and even Hindu and Buddhist scriptures.


Another point is that the GG’s were likely done by the mystical Rosicrucian’s not necessarily a NWO group, though they are very mysterious and cloak their work in allegory and mystical symbols



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 06:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

"Don't see it happening in my lifetime. How much longer is earth sustainable at current growth rate?"

Few 100 years at best i imagine, possibly a whole lot less if climate change significantly impacts our agricultural industry rather a large percentage of our respective populations will starve to death or be forced to eat one another.

Que bring out the soylent green i imagine.


The real problem is fresh water sources, without a significant break through regarding desalination projects and efficiency our future populations wont have anything to drink.
edit on 16-12-2016 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 06:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Annee

"Don't see it happening in my lifetime. How much longer is earth sustainable at current growth rate?"

Few 100 years at best i imagine, possibly a whole lot less if climate change significantly impacts our agricultural industry rather a large percentage of our respective populations will starve to death or be forced to eat one another.

Que bring out the soylent green i imagine.


Yeah, probably.

But, don't try to force people to be smart or responsible for a future caused by today's actions. Both theirs and natural.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 06:26 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

Interesting you bring up agriculture.

I just said in another thread, forget about bringing back manufacturing jobs. Focus on agriculture.

Our land mass is in a Goldilock zone. We have all the right stuff to produce almost any kind of food.

I'd say focus on agricultural science, new methods, and GMOs that will be sustainable during our climate shifts.

We could possibly be/become the food capital of the world.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 06:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

"But, don't try to force people to be smart or responsible for a future caused by today's actions. Both theirs and natural."

When has any generation ever really cared or considered future generations? That's a long game humanity simply does not have the longevity to appreciate im afraid.

When "They" have us living hand to mouth, as a significant percentage of the populations our respective first world nations are these days never mind the third, its simply to force us to believe what ever they wish.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 06:33 PM
link   
To depopulated the world all we need to do is have a one child policy or offer cash to folk who get the snip for the good of all.
Only take a few generations I think.



new topics

top topics



 
99
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join